[R] Flaming

[El-Amin Caliphate]

*cough* Middle Ages Europe *cough*

was middle ages europe a developed country? correct me if i'm wrong. i don't think you can read.

Is this actionable?

[The Free Joy State]

This "can't read" comment also appears to be somewhat baity, here:

Middle-ages Europe was terrible and disease-ridden BECAUSE of the mixing of waste and water! It bred cholera everywhere. Old London was an absolutely disgusting place to live because people just threw shit into the water!

you again can't read. i specifically mentioned not developing countries, only developed. middle ages europe wasn't a developed country by modern standards

This whole thread doesn't seem to be going anywhere positive.

[Heloin]

Letting people shit freely would actively harm society. Just because you keep saying no to everyone telling you so doesn't make you right. And I really don't know why you keep bringing up retirees.

you don't know what senior pranks are. search it up, you must not live in the u.s. i'm not talking about old people. and i'm giving logical reasons actually if you read them. maybe people just have comprehension issues like you don't know what a senior prank is.

[The Free Joy State]

And random-letter spam:
viewtopic.php?p=35812109#p35812109

[Luna Amore]

Flaming addressed and topic mercy flushed.

[The Free Joy State]

Thanks, Luna!

[El-Amin Caliphate]

viewtopic.php?f=20&t=466464
Pleasure duplicated the thread

[Heloin]

Thanks Luna! *leaves cookies*

[Luna Amore]

Double locked. Sometimes it takes more than once to get it down.

[Pleasure]

Flame/Threats: Personal attacks against other players, expressed via OOC (out-of-character) comments; insults, swearing and anything posted with intent to offend. In-character remarks can be interpreted this way as well; watch what you post if other posters are unaware you're not serious. Erudite slams while maintaining a veneer of politeness can also be considered flaming. Repeated instances of flaming directed at the same player can be considered harassment, a more serious offense.

I am sorry if a player felt personally attacked. I was just requesting them to read again something I had already mentioned in the debate, as I was overly repeating my arguments. I request to know another way of asking people to reread something I have already posted as an argument in a forum meant for debate without having to be reported. Thank You.

several people have also posted similar comments to me, the forum is yours to see for proof, or I will gladly bring proof of other people "attacking" me in a similar manner.

[Pleasure]

Double locked. Sometimes it takes more than once to get it down.

I just am politely wanting to understand my mistakes so it is not repeated in the future. Feces is definitely pg-13, correct me if I'm wrong. It is in fact a G topic, appearing in several Disney movies. The discussion was leading somewhere in my opinion with instances of letter spamming, in my opinion, although I may be wrong, because of a lack of a concrete counter to my arguments.

[Farnhamia]

Flame/Threats: Personal attacks against other players, expressed via OOC (out-of-character) comments; insults, swearing and anything posted with intent to offend. In-character remarks can be interpreted this way as well; watch what you post if other posters are unaware you're not serious. Erudite slams while maintaining a veneer of politeness can also be considered flaming. Repeated instances of flaming directed at the same player can be considered harassment, a more serious offense.

I am sorry if a player felt personally attacked. I was just requesting them to read again something I had already mentioned in the debate, as I was overly repeating my arguments. I request to know another way of asking people to reread something I have already posted as an argument in a forum meant for debate without having to be reported. Thank You.

several people have also posted similar comments to me, the forum is yours to see for proof, or I will gladly bring proof of other people "attacking" me in a similar manner.

Please, report them. I just read through the thread and didn't see anything that seemed actionable. It seemed to me to be mostly you going "It's a good idea! Freedom! Philosophical discussion!" and most everyone else going "No! Yuck! Germ, disease, infection!" But sure, post some links and we'll take a look at them. The thread remains locked.

[Ganglangl]

I admit I had not looked at the rules carefully, unaware of flaming.

"You know what? This makes so little sense that it actually transcends space and time to take away sense from other arguments. It's like a logic vacuum. A sense black hole that sucks up reason."

This is also an insult to my knowledge by La Pas de Los Ricos.

"The conclusion doesn't follow the premise." This is flamebaiting, provoking me as an indirect insult to my knowledge (in this case linking the premise and conclusion).

"Trying to rule lawyer your way with a shitty topic (no pun intended) isn't a sound strategy to keep that topic up."
by Heloin. Just because my topic is taboo, people have said offensive comments, treating the debate like a joke. It makes me feel bad that my topic was "shitty".

"this is why god left us" is also a flame, as I am religious and althought I didn't respond, as it was irrelevant to the topic, it was flame nonetheless.

"Choosing a topic because it's "taboo" is a petter weak reason matey." That's another attack on my knowledge.

Again, if you look at most threads you would find these. Althought I was offended, I did not find a reason to report them, as they did me. The topic once again is PG-13 and was leading somewhere. If you want, I can explain why your comment that "you going "It's a good idea! Freedom! Philosophical discussion!" and most everyone else going "No! Yuck! Germ, disease, infection!" is not actually a full representation of the debate, I hope I did not offend you by that, but as an OP fully immersed in it, my belief was that it was being debated like it should have, without the flaming, which I agains admit is a fault of mine. The discussion was closed however for

" If it were just once, that'd be one thing, but to consistently insult other poster's intelligence gets you a *** Warning for flaming ***.

Considering the quality of this topic, I'm gonna go ahead and flush it."

by Luna Amore, the flaming was not the reason of closure, the "quality of the [PG-13] topic" was, which was unjust. I believe that that judgement was more of an opinion, that is only my belief, I am sorry if I am wrong.

Discussion should not be locked for the sake of it.
Thank You

PS. Is removing a nation for flaming actionable?

[USS Monitor]

We're not going to reopen the scat threads.

[Farnhamia]

We're not going to reopen the scat threads.

And anyway, he's a returnee DOS.

[Qwertyuioplkjhgfd]

where is removing nations a rule? also on what rule is that judgement based "not reopening the scat threads"

[Qwertyuioplkjhgfd]

it's very easy to make a new account, in case you didn't realize

[USS Monitor]

We're not reopening the scat threads. You are not allowed to post new ones. Don't spam Moderation about it.