MAGAThread XV: Because Another

[The Greater Ohio Valley]

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/04/09/does-donald-trump-have-dementia-we-need-know-psychologist-column/3404007002/

This explains a lot. Trump having second stage dimentia explains his spelling, speaking mishaps, and behavior...

Shit likes this makes me wonder if he’ll end up getting 25th’d should he end up winning a second term, there’s no breaks on the dementia train.

[Gormwood]

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/04/09/does-donald-trump-have-dementia-we-need-know-psychologist-column/3404007002/

This explains a lot. Trump having second stage dimentia explains his spelling, speaking mishaps, and behavior...

Shit likes this makes me wonder if he’ll end up getting 25th’d should he end up winning a second term, there’s no breaks on the dementia train.

Pfft, he'll continue to be coddled like the spoiled brat he's always been even while he thinks he's playing Missile Command with the Football.

[Ifreann]

Then disable the account and release all the tweets. Problem solved

Call me old-fashioned, but I don't necessarily trust Twitter to do that. Not out of malice, just out of the kind of incompetence or mistakes that tech companies are prone to making.

You don't trust Twitter to give an accurate record of Trump's tweets if they closed his account, therefore Twitter needs to keep Trump's account open and continue to keep a record of his tweets on their site.

You don't trust them with the public record, so they need keep maintaining the public record.


And this is before we consider that twitter.com is not "the public record". You think the White House isn't making records of Trump's tweets all on their own? Come on. There's probably an army of bots copying his every tweet, even if only to catch him deleting tweets.

[Proctopeo]

... this has been a horrid weekend, isn't it? Trump at his element, and he wouldn't stop fucking tweeting --

I wish Twitter would disable his account as he’s repeatedly violated terms of service but there is clearly a double standard in social media

They just apply to him the same standards applied to other verifieds. That is to say, he has a blank check to do whatever he wants, even outside of reason. Him being a head of state does compound this, but he'd get away with what he does even if he weren't currently President.

It's just that most of the verified users on Twitter who say terrible things are Democrats or leftists, like that guy who wanted to put kids into a woodchipper for wrongthink, so you don't care to notice the difference between normals and verifieds unless it's Trump.

[The Stupids]

Call me old-fashioned, but I don't necessarily trust Twitter to do that. Not out of malice, just out of the kind of incompetence or mistakes that tech companies are prone to making.

You don't trust Twitter to give an accurate record of Trump's tweets if they closed his account, therefore Twitter needs to keep Trump's account open and continue to keep a record of his tweets on their site.

You don't trust them with the public record, so they need keep maintaining the public record.


And this is before we consider that twitter.com is not "the public record". You think the White House isn't making records of Trump's tweets all on their own? Come on. There's probably an army of bots copying his every tweet, even if only to catch him deleting tweets.

^this

[Druulis]

I wish Twitter would disable his account as he’s repeatedly violated terms of service but there is clearly a double standard in social media

They just apply to him the same standards applied to other verifieds. That is to say, he has a blank check to do whatever he wants, even outside of reason. Him being a head of state does compound this, but he'd get away with what he does even if he weren't currently President.

It's just that most of the verified users on Twitter who say terrible things are Democrats or leftists, like that guy who wanted to put kids into a woodchipper for wrongthink, so you don't care to notice the difference between normals and verifieds unless it's Trump.

I mean Trump is a threat to the global order but sure that's just as bad as a liberal saying something you disagree with.

[Loben The 2nd]

They just apply to him the same standards applied to other verifieds. That is to say, he has a blank check to do whatever he wants, even outside of reason. Him being a head of state does compound this, but he'd get away with what he does even if he weren't currently President.

It's just that most of the verified users on Twitter who say terrible things are Democrats or leftists, like that guy who wanted to put kids into a woodchipper for wrongthink, so you don't care to notice the difference between normals and verifieds unless it's Trump.

I mean Trump is a threat to the global order but sure that's just as bad as a liberal saying something you disagree with.

I’m pretty sure most people will be opposed to putting people in a wood chipper.

[Druulis]

I mean Trump is a threat to the global order but sure that's just as bad as a liberal saying something you disagree with.

I’m pretty sure most people will be opposed to putting people in a wood chipper.

Depends on who it is.

[Loben The 2nd]

I’m pretty sure most people will be opposed to putting people in a wood chipper.

Depends on who it is.

A teenager who smirked at a annoying person?

[The Black Forrest]

I wish Twitter would disable his account as he’s repeatedly violated terms of service but there is clearly a double standard in social media

They just apply to him the same standards applied to other verifieds. That is to say, he has a blank check to do whatever he wants, even outside of reason. Him being a head of state does compound this, but he'd get away with what he does even if he weren't currently President.

It's just that most of the verified users on Twitter who say terrible things are Democrats or leftists, like that guy who wanted to put kids into a woodchipper for wrongthink, so you don't care to notice the difference between normals and verifieds unless it's Trump.

Nah. If he repeatedly violates the rules, deletion is warranted.

After all it's twitters property; they can do what they want....right?

[The Black Forrest]

Depends on who it is.

A teenager who smirked at a annoying person?

Want to shorten that list down?

[Loben The 2nd]

A teenager who smirked at a annoying person?

Want to shorten that list down?

White catholic teenager who smirked on camera to a Indian banging a drum.

[The Black Forrest]

Want to shorten that list down?

White catholic teenager who smirked on camera to a Indian banging a drum.

Wood chipper? Maybe a smack.

[Loben The 2nd]

White catholic teenager who smirked on camera to a Indian banging a drum.

Wood chipper? Maybe a smack.

I’m thinking a less....violent and more “leave then lunatic alone” approach.

[Druulis]

Depends on who it is.

A teenager who smirked at a annoying person?

Oh hell yeah, Fargo that guy.

[Loben The 2nd]

A teenager who smirked at a annoying person?

Oh hell yeah, Fargo that guy.

So....wonton act of murder for smirking. That’s s new one.

[Hurtful Thoughts]

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/04/09/does-donald-trump-have-dementia-we-need-know-psychologist-column/3404007002/

This explains a lot. Trump having second stage dimentia explains his spelling, speaking mishaps, and behavior...

The irony being you yourself misspelled dementia even when it's in the URL of the link you posted.

I wish Twitter would disable his account as he’s repeatedly violated terms of service but there is clearly a double standard in social media

No, it's just that he's a head of state.

He also accounts for 60% of Twitter's ad-revenue because so many people flock to his tweeties every morning.

Seriously.

That kinda leaked when a disgruntled employee tried deleting his account on their last day.

They just apply to him the same standards applied to other verifieds. That is to say, he has a blank check to do whatever he wants, even outside of reason. Him being a head of state does compound this, but he'd get away with what he does even if he weren't currently President.

It's just that most of the verified users on Twitter who say terrible things are Democrats or leftists, like that guy who wanted to put kids into a woodchipper for wrongthink, so you don't care to notice the difference between normals and verifieds unless it's Trump.

I mean Trump is a threat to the global order but sure that's just as bad as a liberal saying something you disagree with.

I was taught global authortarianism is bad, m'kay?

But then Again:

“I’m agin luggin’ in any sich forin’ affairs, but I will say that a man must be a great fool who can’t spell a word more than one way.”

[Tarsonis]

A teenager who smirked at a annoying person?

Oh hell yeah, Fargo that guy.

I thought the left hated victim blaming

[The Black Forrest]

Oh hell yeah, Fargo that guy.

I thought the left hated victim blaming

He wasn't a victim.

[Hurtful Thoughts]

Oh hell yeah, Fargo that guy.

I thought the left hated victim blaming

Nah, they have a love/hate relationship with it.

Hate it when people of an opposed ideology do it.
-Love doing it themselves.

In other news, water is wet.

[Jack Thomas Lang]

He wasn't a victim.

Are we talking about the school kids who were verbally abused by racist Black Israelites and then harassed by a Native American "Vet"?

I think there's a case for them being victims.

[The Black Forrest]

He wasn't a victim.

Are we talking about the school kids who were verbally abused by racist Black Israelites and then harassed by a Native American "Vet"?

I think there's a case for them being victims.

Verbally abused? Sure. Harassed? Hardly.

Not part of the OP BTW. Wanna relive it? Start a new one.

[Tarsonis]

Are we talking about the school kids who were verbally abused by racist Black Israelites and then harassed by a Native American "Vet"?

I think there's a case for them being victims.

Verbally abused? Sure. Harassed? Hardly.

Not part of the OP BTW. Wanna relive it? Start a new one.

Nice ejection Goose, hope the chute opens

[Drexel Burnham Lambert]

We helped Trump acquire several hotels in the late 80s and early 90s, but we were best known for:

1) Underwriting the debt that KKR used in its leveraged buyout of RJR Nabsico, creating the modern private equity transaction model as we know it
2) Representing corporate raider T. Boone Pickens in many of his oil transactions in the early 1980s
3). Revolutionizing the high yield bond market, under financier Michael Milken's guidance

And we went down in a blaze of glory when Rudy Giuliani, then the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York, threatened to bring a RICO Act against us.

[Gormwood]

FOX NEWS' CHRIS WALLACE CHALLENGES LINDSEY GRAHAM ON HIS 1998 CLAIM THAT IGNORING SUBPOENAS IS IMPEACHABLE

IOKIYAR is still in full effect.