Cappuccina wrote:Torrocca wrote:
... Are you just going to ignore the metric fuckton of evidence that multiple people have provided in these past ten or so pages that's both direct and supporting evidence that upholds the validity of genderfluidity as a concept? Really now?
The rest of what's being said is irrelevant, at the moment.
It isn't evidence is speculation. You're jumping to conclusions hoping that it's a thing, I'll suspend my belief til it's a sure thing thank you very much.
The second half of my post is relevant to the overall theme and the state of trans culture. There's an obsession with including everything under the sun in LBGT, thanks to God the MAPs are being repulsed like the plague, at least we're that sane.
tbh part of me thinks the MAP bullshit is going to be the next big push for equality for some people after trans rights are really solidified and that thought makes me really angry