Communal concils wrote:1. Simplistic Moralism
2. Simplistic Moralism. You clearly don't know that the world is not that simply. Execution and punishment are not bad in of themselves. The purpose and consequence is the only true concern. If people were rape, then the rapist should be killed. If a terrorist bombed a mass gathering, then they should face harsh conditions. Anarchist are childish. They assume that things are bad for the sake of it.Anarchist only know to mock and criticize, and they offer nothing but fairy tales.
3. Still simplistic. If you suffered from economic exploitation, then it's natural for you to feel bad. In Medieval times, Feudalism was the major system of the time. Peasants did lot's of work, and they did not get good living conditions. Feudalism was a economic system that prevented generation of families from ranking up the classes. Some how, It's suddenly bad when they upraise. They are then rebelling against "God" and the old order. It's also suddenly bad to punish the leader and higher classes that remove prosperity for your people. If the new order of a revolution improves conditions and access to resources, then the people are liberated.
4. Strawmen. It's bad when the Bolsheviks remove the white movement, which was trying to squash their movement, but some how Rojava isn't doing the same with ISIS.
5. Anarchist like to rename everything. That's not a state " It a confederation of Municipalities", that's not a leader ", It's a guide".
Rojava is oppressive to ISIS, it's simple. Oppression: unjust or cruel exercise of authority or power - Merriam Webster dictionary
Rojava has military, and it has leadership. There are videos on YouTube of rojavan troops Torturing ISIS members, which isn't a problem a problem to me. Why don't you just watch it. Honestly, the torture is against the will of the soldiers being killed. Also, Oppression and self-defense don't contradict. There are nations that send dangerous criminals to remote prisons, where they are isolated in the name of public safety. Perhaps, some of these people are heros to anarchist, and I'm sure that anarchist want to abolish prisons(Which Rojava has not, which there are accounts of guards beating them).
6. So, You want them to be in a comfy cell room. With pillows, and free food and water. So pampering them is the solution, until there is justice. Even if they killed thousands, It's bad for them to face their own consequences. So Rapist shouldn't be punished for their crimes ?
7.
"the state is that human community that (successfully) claims the monopoly of the legitimate use of violence within a given territory."- Max Weber.
Zapistas were able to claim power through force(a Revolution, a violent one). They have control over what happens in their territory(which is Chipas), and they use force to maintain control( they harass drug dealers, and they ban smuggling of drugs. That's not so anarchist, but it's great). As for Rojava, they don't accept all opposition. I'm sure they make Islamist vanish in the night. So these are not anarchist territories.
as for the Third world anarchism, It seems like there is no true interest. I'm not denying the existence of anarchist in the third world, but they seem rare because of the reason of not being popular.
I fail to see any issue with Rojava being “oppressive” to ISIL. Good. ISIL is an extremist shit terrorist group which has harmed far too many people. ISIL deserves, in full, what it gets. Good on Rojava if they’re trying to rid themselves of such a plague as ISIL.