Right Wing Discussion Thread XV: A New Hoppe

[Torrocca]

For all your posturing, you sure've seemed to forgotten you can be quoted too:



I'm sure you totally meant that that was a good thing, though, them putting a stop to the horrors caused by the genocidal regime of the Khmer Rouge. :3

"Invasions of Laos and Cambodia and the war with China"

> Somehow means the same as saying the Khmer Rouge are the good guys
> Somehow also means me crying about their defeat

I'm sure you totally meant that the invasion of Cambodia and the seizure of power from the genocidal Khmer Rouge was a good thing when you'd just spent the previous posts ranting and raving about how invading Communist Vietnam was totally definitely worth it. :^)

I literally have to ask at this point if you're capable of literacy?

Gotta love these incredible character attacks thinly-veiled as "just asking questions" that you keep breaking out, tbh. :3

[The Galactic Liberal Democracy]

Would any Right-wingers consider themselves Anti-Capitalist. If so, what is your reasons at rejecting capitalism.

I’m both right wing and socialist because capitalism is generic and freedom isn’t based.

[Communal concils]

Since you are talking about the Vietnam war, what is your view on foreign policy ?

A degree of intervention can be necessary to protect national and international interests; the military should be of modest size, sufficient to defend the country against reasonable threats, able to perform independent operations, and with ample room to grow in case of an emergency.

Oh and the EU is a bad thing, bring back the EEC.

Well for Europe, I wouldn't want even that organization forming. I think Europe would be better of with out such Neo-Liberalism, and I think the rest of the world would be better without it too.

[Joohan]

Would any Right-wingers consider themselves Anti-Capitalist. If so, what is your reasons at rejecting capitalism.

I’m both right wing and socialist because capitalism is generic and freedom isn’t based.

#Woke

[Communal concils]

Would any Right-wingers consider themselves Anti-Capitalist. If so, what is your reasons at rejecting capitalism.

I’m both right wing and socialist because capitalism is generic and freedom isn’t based.

VERY WOKE

[The Galactic Liberal Democracy]

Offensive wars shouldn't happen except in a select few exceptions, I think. Diplomacy and peaceful solutions to problems are far, far more preferable than war.

Interesting.Now, do you think that Neo-conservatives and Neo-liberals are Cancer.

I find it unlikely that all neolibs and neocons were born around the same month, but maybe they are aliens.

[Joohan]

Since you are talking about the Vietnam war, what is your view on foreign policy ?

The military should be small and should only go to war in defense of the nation.

That's not how the world works anymore.

[Totally Not OEP]

I'm sure you totally meant that the invasion of Cambodia and the seizure of power from the genocidal Khmer Rouge was a good thing when you'd just spent the previous posts ranting and raving about how invading Communist Vietnam was totally definitely worth it. :^)

If you're asking me for my actual opinion, yes, I do see both as worth it. Unlike you I actually support offensive war.

Gotta love these incredible character attacks thinly-veiled as "just asking questions" that you keep breaking out, tbh. :3

Physician, heal thyself.

So what you're clearly saying is that the 4th Alabama was comprised entirely of Georgians yet kept the Alabaman name.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

I'll go with what CM said, that organization =/= mobilization. :^)

I'm sure you'll show the class your much more accurate map any day now, then. :^)

[The Galactic Liberal Democracy]

I’m both right wing and socialist because capitalism is generic and freedom isn’t based.

#Woke

Btw, I’m role playing as a liberal sheeple who lives under a rock and thinks that something is true because the elitists running NASA said it.

I’m both right wing and socialist because capitalism is generic and freedom isn’t based.

VERY WOKE

I’m so woke that I don’t need to rest or have caffeine in any situation.

[The Galactic Liberal Democracy]

The military should be small and should only go to war in defense of the nation.

That's not how the world works anymore.

The military can be smaller if we attack Russia and China.

[Torrocca]

I'm sure you totally meant that the invasion of Cambodia and the seizure of power from the genocidal Khmer Rouge was a good thing when you'd just spent the previous posts ranting and raving about how invading Communist Vietnam was totally definitely worth it. :^)

If you're asking me for my actual opinion, yes, I do see both as worth it.

I love how you're trying to save face now after you'd played the invasion of Cambodia as a bad thing in regards to Vietnam. That really gets my almonds cooking. :^)

Unlike you I actually support offensive war.

Out of bloodlust, of course, as has been previously noted.

Gotta love these incredible character attacks thinly-veiled as "just asking questions" that you keep breaking out, tbh. :3

Physician, heal thyself.

So what you're clearly saying is that the 4th Alabama was comprised entirely of Georgians yet kept the Alabaman name.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

I'll go with what CM said, that organization =/= mobilization. :^)

I'm sure you'll show the class your much more accurate map any day now, then. :^)

Hmmm, I didn't realize asking for a map and stating that an Alabaman unit being comprised entirely of Georgians is suspicious constitutes a character attack nowadays.

Guess that makes sense, though, since you'd be the type of person to think of the CSA as a manifestation of yourself. :3

[Joohan]

That's not how the world works anymore.

The military can be smaller if we attack Russia and China.

Be a lot smaller...

[The Galactic Liberal Democracy]

The military can be smaller if we attack Russia and China.

Be a lot smaller...

There can’t be any more large wars if there aren’t large armies.

[Communal concils]

The military should be small and should only go to war in defense of the nation.

That's not how the world works anymore.

That's the reason why Extreme Libertarian ideals will never be completely implemented. A Centralize sate would roll it over and conquer it.

If a Libertarian Militia was formed in libertarian society, then it would just be lazy drunk hooligans surrendering in a few hours.

[Joohan]

Be a lot smaller...

There can’t be any more large wars if there aren’t large armies.

Or large nations

[Joohan]

That's not how the world works anymore.

That's the reason why Extreme Libertarian ideals will never be completely implemented. A Centralize sate would roll it over and conquer it.

If a Libertarian Militia was formed in libertarian society, then it would just be lazy drunk hooligans surrendering in a few hours.[/quote

The IRA.


I am just imagining the IRA.

[Communal concils]

Be a lot smaller...

There can’t be any more large wars if there aren’t large armies.

Remember the treaty of Versailles?

[Totally Not OEP]

I love how you're trying to save face now after you'd played the invasion of Cambodia as a bad thing in regards to Vietnam. That really gets my almonds cooking. :^)

I'll ask again: quote me where I said that.

Out of bloodlust, of course, as has been previously noted.

You're so full of bullshit it's a wonder you can even see to type. It's absolutely hilarious how you can, on one day talk gleefully of dead Germans in WWII or how all SS members in particular should've been shot, but then when I say Communist soldiers should be killed, somehow I'm full of bloodlust. As I said, no one is buying your false morality play because its obvious bullshit. You're either a blatant hypocrite or have been so consumed by a petty desire to attempt to one up me that you've decided its better to surrender any degree of critical thinking.

Hmmm, I didn't realize asking for a map and stating that an Alabaman unit being comprised entirely of Georgians is suspicious constitutes a character attack nowadays.

Guess that makes sense, though, since you'd be the type of person to think of the CSA as a manifestation of yourself. :3

> "I love these character assassinations disguised as questions"
> Gets shown doing exactly the same fucking thing
> "Those are just literal statements"

Gotta love your hypocrisy, let me known you actually develop a sense of consistency.

[Torrocca]

I love how you're trying to save face now after you'd played the invasion of Cambodia as a bad thing in regards to Vietnam. That really gets my almonds cooking. :^)

I'll ask again: quote me where I said that.

It's implied in the fact that you brought it up immediately after fucking ranting about how invading Vietnam was worthwhile.

Out of bloodlust, of course, as has been previously noted.

You're so full of bullshit it's a wonder you can even see to type. It's absolutely hilarious how you can, on one day talk gleefully of dead Germans in WWII or how all SS members in particular should've been shot, but then when I say Communist soldiers should be killed, somehow I'm full of bloodlust. As I said, no one is buying your false morality play because its obvious bullshit. You're either a blatant hypocrite or have been so consumed by a petty desire to attempt to one up me that you've decided its better to surrender any degree of critical thinking.

Maybe you can prove I've done either of those things and people will believe you. :^3

Hmmm, I didn't realize asking for a map and stating that an Alabaman unit being comprised entirely of Georgians is suspicious constitutes a character attack nowadays.

Guess that makes sense, though, since you'd be the type of person to think of the CSA as a manifestation of yourself. :3

> "I love these character assassinations disguised as questions"
> Gets shown doing exactly the same fucking thing
> "Those are just literal statements"

Gotta love your hypocrisy, let me known you actually develop a sense of consistency.

>Literally just asked about a map and questioned the veracity of the idea that an Alabaman unit in the CSA would be purely comprised of Georgians
>"ThiS iS CLeArLy A ChArAcTeR aTtAcK oF tHe HiGhEsT oRdeR!!1!"

[Totally Not OEP]

It's implied in the fact that you brought it up immediately after fucking ranting about how invading Vietnam was worthwhile.

So I actually never said it by your own admission, thanks for admitting to your bullshit finally.

Maybe you can prove I've done either of those things and people will believe you. :^3

>Literally just asked about a map and questioned the veracity of the idea that an Alabaman unit in the CSA would be purely comprised of Georgians
>"ThiS iS CLeArLy A ChArAcTeR aTtAcK oF tHe HiGhEsT oRdeR!!1!"

Please do tell how you use several hundred m characters or smiley faces to ask someone for either of that. I find it funny implied meanings don't apply to you but somehow you find it entirely justifiable to apply them wildly to others.

[Torrocca]

It's implied in the fact that you brought it up immediately after fucking ranting about how invading Vietnam was worthwhile.

So I actually never said it by your own admission, thanks for admitting to your bullshit finally.

>TFW context is utterly irrelevant

10/10, that's about the exact argument I'd expect from you. :3

Maybe you can prove I've done either of those things and people will believe you. :^3

That doesn't say, "all SS members in particular should've been shot," like you claimed.

>Literally just asked about a map and questioned the veracity of the idea that an Alabaman unit in the CSA would be purely comprised of Georgians
>"ThiS iS CLeArLy A ChArAcTeR aTtAcK oF tHe HiGhEsT oRdeR!!1!"

Please do tell how you use several hundred m characters or smiley faces to ask someone for either of that. I find it funny implied meanings don't apply to you but somehow you find it entirely justifiable to apply them wildly to others.

Underline where it's implied in either of those two posts I was somehow attacking your character then, by questioning the veracity of an Alabaman unit being entirely Georgian and asking for a fucking map of all things. I'd love to see how you make that connection.

[Joohan]

Mom, Dad, please stop fighting.

[Totally Not OEP]

>TFW context is utterly irrelevant

10/10, that's about the exact argument I'd expect from you. :3

I'll ask for a third time then: Where was this said anywhere?

Because otherwise you're going to explain how "Invasions of Laos and Cambodia along with the border war with China" means "Vietnam is evil for attacking the Khmers and Pol Pot was a good guy". You're either full of shit or illiterate, there is no middle ground at this point.

That doesn't say, "all SS members in particular should've been shot," like you claimed.

Are you kidding me?

"I thought you were going to say the only good Nazi is a dead Nazi."
"That's still true for 99.99999% of the Nazis. Fuck everyone in the SS."

You literally agreed that 99.9999% of Nazis should be killed, and specifically said everyone in the SS.

Underline where it's implied in either of those two posts I was somehow attacking your character then, by questioning the veracity of an Alabaman unit being entirely Georgian and asking for a fucking map of all things. I'd love to see how you make that connection.

Again, you're so full of shit it's honestly astounding; you demand I underline the implied meaning for your posts but I've had to ask you three times now to prove your bullshit at the top of this post.

[Torrocca]

>TFW context is utterly irrelevant

10/10, that's about the exact argument I'd expect from you. :3

I'll ask for a third time then: Where was this said anywhere?

Because otherwise you're going to explain how "Invasions of Laos and Cambodia along with the border war with China" means "Vietnam is evil for attacking the Khmers and Pol Pot was a good guy". You're either full of shit or illiterate, there is no middle ground at this point.

It's entirely implied in the context of you wanking over the idea that fighting Vietnam was worthwhile. :3

That doesn't say, "all SS members in particular should've been shot," like you claimed.

Are you kidding me?

"I thought you were going to say the only good Nazi is a dead Nazi."
"That's still true for 99.99999% of the Nazis. Fuck everyone in the SS."

You literally agreed that 99.9999% of Nazis should be killed, and specifically said everyone in the SS.

Yet it still doesn't say, "all SS members in particular should've been shot," like you claimed. :^3

Underline where it's implied in either of those two posts I was somehow attacking your character then, by questioning the veracity of an Alabaman unit being entirely Georgian and asking for a fucking map of all things. I'd love to see how you make that connection.

Again, you're so full of shit it's honestly astounding; you demand I underline the implied meaning for your posts but I've had to ask you three times now to prove your bullshit at the top of this post.

Or it may just be that there's no implied meaning behind asking for a map, and you're merely pitifully grasping for straws in an attempt to epicly own me?

Nah, I totally attacked your character by asking for a map.

[Totally Not OEP]

It's entirely implied in the context of you wanking over the idea that fighting Vietnam was worthwhile. :3

Then for the fourth time, do show the context then. We both know the reason why you haven't.

Yet it still doesn't say, "all SS members in particular should've been shot," like you claimed. :^3

Do explain then for us all how you intend to kill 99.99999% of Nazis in general and all of the SS then.

Or it may just be that there's no implied meaning behind asking for a map, and you're merely pitifully grasping for straws in an attempt to epicly own me?

Nah, I totally attacked your character by asking for a map.

Again, gotta love your bullshit; context allegedly proves it for my post at the top but, again, you're magically beyond the rules. Gotta love how big of a hypocrite you are.