NATION

PASSWORD

Transgender Discussion Thread III: Vote in our poll!

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What should the first subtitle of our next thread be?

Trans Men Are Not Women
23
24%
Anti-Cistamines
10
10%
Please Don't Deadnaming Eve
3
3%
Is This Destroying My Free Speech
8
8%
We Know More About This Than You
11
11%
HRT And Crumpets
26
27%
Pro-Nouns & Anti-Verbs
16
16%
 
Total votes : 97

User avatar
Soviet Technocracy4
Secretary
 
Posts: 32
Founded: Mar 17, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Soviet Technocracy4 » Tue Mar 19, 2019 7:26 am

Tarsonis wrote:I'm not saying that gender non-coforming people don't exist. They do, I'm saying transtrenders are not gender non-conforming, they're transtrenders.

Plenty of Gender nonconforming people conform, but they are not called binarytrenders.
Last edited by Soviet Technocracy4 on Tue Mar 19, 2019 7:28 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Soviet Technocracy4
Secretary
 
Posts: 32
Founded: Mar 17, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Soviet Technocracy4 » Tue Mar 19, 2019 7:27 am

Twilight Imperium wrote:There are those who would say that treating it like a toy undermines the efforts of people who are trying to gain serious acceptance for such things. :eyebrow:

Gender IS a toy, we are not labels.

User avatar
Evil Dictators Happyland
Senator
 
Posts: 3517
Founded: Aug 03, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Evil Dictators Happyland » Tue Mar 19, 2019 7:29 am

Soviet Technocracy4 wrote:
Tarsonis wrote:I'm not saying that gender non-coforming people don't exist. They do, I'm saying transtrenders are not gender non-conforming, they're transtrenders.

Plenty of Gender noncoforming people conform, but they are not called binarytrenders.

Ignoring the fact that "binarytrender" doesn't exactly roll off the tongue, do you have any evidence to back up the assertion that most people are secretly nonbinary?

User avatar
Soviet Technocracy4
Secretary
 
Posts: 32
Founded: Mar 17, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Soviet Technocracy4 » Tue Mar 19, 2019 7:32 am

Evil Dictators Happyland wrote:Ignoring the fact that "binarytrender" doesn't exactly roll off the tongue, do you have any evidence to back up the assertion that most people are secretly nonbinary?

“Most people” don’t have to be, but it is an enforced norm. Why enforce it if you don’t have something to hide.
Last edited by Soviet Technocracy4 on Tue Mar 19, 2019 7:34 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Twilight Imperium
Minister
 
Posts: 2947
Founded: May 19, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Twilight Imperium » Tue Mar 19, 2019 7:36 am

Soviet Technocracy4 wrote:
Evil Dictators Happyland wrote:Ignoring the fact that "binarytrender" doesn't exactly roll off the tongue, do you have any evidence to back up the assertion that most people are secretly nonbinary?

“Most people” don’t have to be, but it is an enforced norm. Why enforce it if you don’t have something to hide.


I don't know. What happened to Soviet Technocracy 3?

User avatar
Evil Dictators Happyland
Senator
 
Posts: 3517
Founded: Aug 03, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Evil Dictators Happyland » Tue Mar 19, 2019 7:44 am

Soviet Technocracy4 wrote:
Evil Dictators Happyland wrote:Ignoring the fact that "binarytrender" doesn't exactly roll off the tongue, do you have any evidence to back up the assertion that most people are secretly nonbinary?

“Most people” don’t have to be, but it is an enforced norm. Why enforce it if you don’t have something to hide.

Yes, nonbinary people exist. This is a fact. Yes, society as a whole dislikes the idea of a nonbinary person. This is also a fact. However, the idea that someone would act like an average person for the sake of showing off is completely ludicrous. And I think that you're definition of "trend" is a bit loose, considering that you're referring to a set of social norms that have been in place about as long as human society has existed (unless you can prove the case that, until recently, there was no resistance to nonbinary people, but since that's stupid...), and something can't be a trend unless it is a new thing last I checked.
I'm sorry if I'm misunderstanding your point, but in my defense, I'm not entirely certain what your point actually is.

User avatar
Soviet Technocracy4
Secretary
 
Posts: 32
Founded: Mar 17, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Soviet Technocracy4 » Tue Mar 19, 2019 7:46 am

Evil Dictators Happyland wrote:However, the idea that someone would act like an average person for the sake of showing off is completely ludicrous.

It’s called a corporate suit.

User avatar
Soviet Technocracy4
Secretary
 
Posts: 32
Founded: Mar 17, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Soviet Technocracy4 » Tue Mar 19, 2019 7:47 am

Twilight Imperium wrote:I don't know. What happened to Soviet Technocracy 3?

Tried another setting but Plucky Settlers gets better environment

User avatar
Twilight Imperium
Minister
 
Posts: 2947
Founded: May 19, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Twilight Imperium » Tue Mar 19, 2019 7:49 am

Soviet Technocracy4 wrote:
Evil Dictators Happyland wrote:However, the idea that someone would act like an average person for the sake of showing off is completely ludicrous.

It’s called a corporate suit.


Hello fellow human let us consume money with our human mouths, as humans do.

You're alright. :lol:

User avatar
The BlAAtschApen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 65976
Founded: Antiquity
New York Times Democracy

Postby The BlAAtschApen » Tue Mar 19, 2019 7:59 am

Soviet Technocracy4 wrote:
Evil Dictators Happyland wrote:However, the idea that someone would act like an average person for the sake of showing off is completely ludicrous.

It’s called a corporate suit.


I want to say that this comment is winning.

But alas, it is just a tie.
The Blaatschapen should resign
Dark Theme users won't see this line.

I don't believe in the market economy, I'm a sheep, not a little piggy.

User avatar
The BlAAtschApen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 65976
Founded: Antiquity
New York Times Democracy

Postby The BlAAtschApen » Tue Mar 19, 2019 7:59 am

Soviet Technocracy4 wrote:
Tarsonis wrote:It's not.

Your partriacrhal societies didn’t have it as much, but a number of Native American cultutes did.


Or, closer to home (for me at least) :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albanian_sworn_virgins
The Blaatschapen should resign
Dark Theme users won't see this line.

I don't believe in the market economy, I'm a sheep, not a little piggy.

User avatar
Tarsonis
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39912
Founded: Sep 20, 2017
Democratic Socialists

Postby Tarsonis » Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:07 am

Soviet Technocracy4 wrote:
Tarsonis wrote:I'm not saying that gender non-coforming people don't exist. They do, I'm saying transtrenders are not gender non-conforming, they're transtrenders.

Plenty of Gender nonconforming people conform, but they are not called binarytrenders.


no, they'd be called closeted. Different goals and motivations, hence the different name.
“Never believe that [fascists] are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The [fascists] have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.”
― Jean-Paul Sartre

User avatar
Soviet Technocracy4
Secretary
 
Posts: 32
Founded: Mar 17, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Soviet Technocracy4 » Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:09 am

Tarsonis wrote:no, they'd be called closeted. Different goals and motivations, hence the different name.

"Transtrenders" are also previously closeted people. Maybe not counting some celebrities, but I'm not sure why we're talking about celebrities anyway.

They show that supposedly Cis people can also be gender nonconforming, for whatever reason.
Last edited by Soviet Technocracy4 on Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:11 am, edited 4 times in total.

User avatar
Soviet Technocracy4
Secretary
 
Posts: 32
Founded: Mar 17, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Soviet Technocracy4 » Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:10 am

The blAAtschApen wrote:I want to say that this comment is winning.

But alas, it is just a tie.

We will go to gender reveal party where we will show off how normal we are, which obviously doesn't happen.

User avatar
Auzkhia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28923
Founded: Mar 11, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Auzkhia » Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:12 am

Can we not do the gatekeeping?

Even if trenders were a thing, which they're not, I don't think we should be grilling other trans people, especially nb/genderqueer people, and say "Are you really your gender?", and doubting a trans/nb person's gender is transphobic. It's just not a good look and it deters people from exploring their gender because they'll get the impression they aren't trans enough. I probably would have come out sooner if I never heard of that gatekeeping mentality, but I held off, because I thought I wasn't trans enough, but I know am enough now. It's not just a principle, it's personal.

And this isn't accounting for the traditional "third genders" of many non-western cultures, and even in some European countries had that as well, but the concept of being cis and trans comes from the western sex-gender system that assigns gender at birth, and uses biological sex as the basis for one's gender identity, and yet not everyone has traditionally believed in that.

Dysphoria is not required to be trans, not being your AGAB is, and I reject transmedicalism and gatekeeping, even as a person who has been formally diagnosed with "gender identity disorder" and takes hormones to both relieve dysphoria and to improve gender euphoria.
Me irl. (she/her/it)
IC name: Celestial Empire of the Romans
Imperial-Royal Statement on NS Stats
Factbook
Trans Lesbian Good Girl Greco-Roman Pagan Democratic Socialist

User avatar
Soviet Technocracy4
Secretary
 
Posts: 32
Founded: Mar 17, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Soviet Technocracy4 » Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:16 am

Auzkhia wrote:"Are you really your gender?".

I am not really a label, no.

User avatar
Cekoviu
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16950
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cekoviu » Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:35 am

Soviet Technocracy4 wrote:
Tarsonis wrote: :roll: Obstinance for obstinance sake is unconvincing. They're not gender non-conforming, they don't even have gender-dysphoria. They adopt the trans-persona, for social gain. Refusing to acknowledge their existence just because you see it as a threat to your ideological agenda, does not negate their existence.

Or gender nonconforming is the historical norm.

By definition, following a norm isn't nonconforming.
pro: women's rights
anti: men's rights

User avatar
Cekoviu
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16950
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cekoviu » Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:40 am

Khasinkonia wrote:
Auzkhia wrote:I knew I was bisexual since I was 16 years old, not too hard, it was after I realized I was sexually and romantically attracted to men as well, and then any gender really, not a limit, technically pansexual, but I'm fine with calling myself bi, and I'm non-binary, so what is really opposite and same sex to me? It doesn't matter anyway, in terms of potential partners' gender, at least.

Funny, for me everything really started catching on fire right from the start of puberty, which I kept on suppressing for two years until I haphazardly stumbled into myself while reflecting on my life at summer camp. Sexuality took about a week, mostly to hammer down a name on the damn thing, while gender took like a year because I wanted to be super-duper sure that I was trans because of course as a minority we continue to be royally fucked as far as the statistics go. Didn’t wanna give up that white male privilage either :p

It seems like trans people often pin down their sexuality far before getting their actual gender figured out, which is really interesting to me. I feel like my sexuality is way more complex than my gender identity, but I definitely understand why somebody might think the reverse (particularly anyone who's genderfluid - my sexual fluidity is a big part of why I can't figure out what it actually is).
pro: women's rights
anti: men's rights

User avatar
Dumb Ideologies
Post Czar
 
Posts: 47881
Founded: Sep 30, 2007
Mother Knows Best State

Postby Dumb Ideologies » Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:40 am

Cekoviu wrote:
Soviet Technocracy4 wrote:Or gender nonconforming is the historical norm.

By definition, following a norm isn't nonconforming.


Thanks for the save. The plot was getting so thick back there that I worried it was going to set like concrete around our legs.
Furthermore, I consider that feminism must be destroyed.

User avatar
Soviet Technocracy4
Secretary
 
Posts: 32
Founded: Mar 17, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Soviet Technocracy4 » Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:41 am

Cekoviu wrote:By definition, following a norm isn't nonconforming.

Ishtar is usually a woman, but sometimes she is bearded or a male lion.

User avatar
Soviet Technocracy4
Secretary
 
Posts: 32
Founded: Mar 17, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Soviet Technocracy4 » Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:46 am

Cekoviu wrote:It seems like trans people often pin down their sexuality far before getting their actual gender figured out, which is really interesting to me.

I encountered them at the same time but sexuality was easier to become conscious of, though the same has occurred for it.
Last edited by Soviet Technocracy4 on Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:50 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Saxony-Brandenburg
Minister
 
Posts: 3052
Founded: Mar 07, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Saxony-Brandenburg » Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:50 am

Auzkhia wrote:Can we not do the gatekeeping?

Even if trenders were a thing, which they're not, I don't think we should be grilling other trans people, especially nb/genderqueer people, and say "Are you really your gender?", and doubting a trans/nb person's gender is transphobic. It's just not a good look and it deters people from exploring their gender because they'll get the impression they aren't trans enough. I probably would have come out sooner if I never heard of that gatekeeping mentality, but I held off, because I thought I wasn't trans enough, but I know am enough now. It's not just a principle, it's personal.

And this isn't accounting for the traditional "third genders" of many non-western cultures, and even in some European countries had that as well, but the concept of being cis and trans comes from the western sex-gender system that assigns gender at birth, and uses biological sex as the basis for one's gender identity, and yet not everyone has traditionally believed in that.

Dysphoria is not required to be trans, not being your AGAB is, and I reject transmedicalism and gatekeeping, even as a person who has been formally diagnosed with "gender identity disorder" and takes hormones to both relieve dysphoria and to improve gender euphoria.


Agreed. It's dangerous, and hurts supposedly "true" trans people too. My mom still refuses to accept me being trans because she says "all transgenders are transtrenders." Even though I have disphoria. So um... Don't play with matches, is my belief.
"When Adam delved and Eve span, who was then the gentleman?"

User avatar
Auzkhia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28923
Founded: Mar 11, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Auzkhia » Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:55 am

Saxony-Brandenburg wrote:
Auzkhia wrote:Can we not do the gatekeeping?

Even if trenders were a thing, which they're not, I don't think we should be grilling other trans people, especially nb/genderqueer people, and say "Are you really your gender?", and doubting a trans/nb person's gender is transphobic. It's just not a good look and it deters people from exploring their gender because they'll get the impression they aren't trans enough. I probably would have come out sooner if I never heard of that gatekeeping mentality, but I held off, because I thought I wasn't trans enough, but I know am enough now. It's not just a principle, it's personal.

And this isn't accounting for the traditional "third genders" of many non-western cultures, and even in some European countries had that as well, but the concept of being cis and trans comes from the western sex-gender system that assigns gender at birth, and uses biological sex as the basis for one's gender identity, and yet not everyone has traditionally believed in that.

Dysphoria is not required to be trans, not being your AGAB is, and I reject transmedicalism and gatekeeping, even as a person who has been formally diagnosed with "gender identity disorder" and takes hormones to both relieve dysphoria and to improve gender euphoria.


Agreed. It's dangerous, and hurts supposedly "true" trans people too. My mom still refuses to accept me being trans because she says "all transgenders are transtrenders." Even though I have disphoria. So um... Don't play with matches, is my belief.

Gatekeeping trans people give ammo to cis people and validate their ignorance and even bigotry. The transtrender concept matches up 100% with the narrative of "it's a lifestyle choice and a choice not to be taken seriously".
Me irl. (she/her/it)
IC name: Celestial Empire of the Romans
Imperial-Royal Statement on NS Stats
Factbook
Trans Lesbian Good Girl Greco-Roman Pagan Democratic Socialist

User avatar
Evil Dictators Happyland
Senator
 
Posts: 3517
Founded: Aug 03, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Evil Dictators Happyland » Tue Mar 19, 2019 8:57 am

Soviet Technocracy4 wrote:
Cekoviu wrote:By definition, following a norm isn't nonconforming.

Ishtar is usually a woman, but sometimes she is bearded or a male lion.

What does a genderfluid Babylonian deity have to do with this topic? I don't think anyone's disputing the idea that nonbinary people (closeted or otherwise) have existed throughout human history, so what purpose does Ishtar serve here?

User avatar
Evil Dictators Happyland
Senator
 
Posts: 3517
Founded: Aug 03, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Evil Dictators Happyland » Tue Mar 19, 2019 9:05 am

Auzkhia wrote:
Saxony-Brandenburg wrote:
Agreed. It's dangerous, and hurts supposedly "true" trans people too. My mom still refuses to accept me being trans because she says "all transgenders are transtrenders." Even though I have disphoria. So um... Don't play with matches, is my belief.

Gatekeeping trans people give ammo to cis people and validate their ignorance and even bigotry. The transtrender concept matches up 100% with the narrative of "it's a lifestyle choice and a choice not to be taken seriously".

Transtrenders do in fact exist. They hurt actual transgender people by removing much of their legitimacy in the eyes of others, yes, but they do in fact exist.
And while we definitely shouldn't assume that any given transgender person is faking it, saying that nobody does that in the face of empirical evidence that at least some people do is just going to convince others that you're making stuff up to justify a cause, which isn't a good thing when you're trying to do the exact opposite.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Commonwealth Of Cursedland, Czechostan, Dumb Ideologies, DutchFormosa, Eahland, Frelon, Google [Bot], Nilokeras, Nova Corrisia, Oceasia, Rusozak, Tekania, The Notorious Mad Jack, The Two Jerseys, Vassenor, Yorsa II

Advertisement

Remove ads