Running more often? Running to more places? Running longer hours? Higher capacity? Just off the top of my head.
Meanwhile Biden and Harris are bumping into either on the train.
What?
Valrifell wrote:Aclion wrote:It's a practical reality that anyone willing to drive in new york city is crazy and mentally unfit for office.
Yes, it is annoying.
Yet it wouldn't be annoying if nobody did it. That traffic and driving in New York sucks is proof that people... drive in NYC. Frequently at that.
Nobody drives in New York, there's too much traffic.
Fahran wrote:Ifreann wrote:"I think we need better investment in public transport"
"And yet you use a car. Interesting."
"Yes, I use a car because public transport is rarely a viable alternative. That's why I want more investment in public transport."
"Look, I was just trying to smugly make you seem like a hypocrite"
"And yet you proved my point for me. Interesting."
I believe one of the sources shared here pointed out that public transportation was, at times, a viable alternative for her campaign but that it wasn't chosen as often as private transportation - something demonstrated by the financial records available. That sort of got sidestepped a little. Again, this is somewhat outside the purview of the discussion about campaign finance that has more or less concluded.
I'm not aware of there being any basis to the claims that public transport was a viable alternative other than the fact that she campaigned in New York. Financial records showing that her campaign used Uber however many times doesn't tell us whether they could have taken the bus, does it?






