United Muscovite Nations wrote:Neutraligon wrote:Except for one thing, you have yet to demonstrate that a god existing in any way validates empirical evidence. A god existing does not mean I can trust my senses any more then if no god exists.
If God exists, then we have a reason to believe that reality also exists, which would validate empirical evidence.
Why is there a reason to think reality exists if a god exists? Why does reality existing validate empirical evidence? I think therefore I am is enough to demonstrate that some form of reality exists (even if I am simply a brain in a vat). Does that validate empirical evidence?