Communal concils wrote:My ideals are only horrible to those of a certain political classification,which is obviously most of the critics(including you).
The only thing you've accomplished so far is to get everyone on NS, from the left to the right, to agree that your ideas are ridiculous.
That's pretty rare, so I guess you can pat yourself on the back for that, but that doesn't change the ridiculousness of your ideals.
It only seems old to those that look at certain concepts ,we could talk about many other differant ideals.The fact that people call my ideals Fascist,Troskyist,Communist ,Maoist,and Third Positionsit and Reactionary shows that my ideal is "New" in some form.
Tossing a bunch of tired old ideas in a blender and thinking the result is something new and worthwhile does not make it a new idea; it just makes it an incomprehensible mess.
To just call me any of this would be
useless, because there is some aspect of my "Theory" that contradicts all these classification. What kind of Trotskyist rejects World revolution, What kind of Communist rejects the "transitional stage", what kind of Reactionary believes in the Destruction of "The Old Order".
In other words, you were being deliberately vague, even though you keep claiming you weren't, by taking several contradicting arguments and pretending they all collide in to something that makes sense and assuming that somehow made it magically bounce of any criticism, even though there are 23 pages of people telling you otherwise.
I wouldn't call my proposal "fanfiction"(maybe you think it's fanction to Stalin), but I would call a Utopia a Fanfiction.I don't think a "Perfect" world is possible.I don't see my ideals as perfect.
Oh hey, something we agree on.
People who write fanfiction usually at least try to write a coherent story.
This is just a jumbled mess of bad ideas that, I agree, are not perfect.
Or anywhere near perfect.
Or even remotely rational.