Communal concils wrote: The Left was never ruined, it has only been oppressed by the Leftoids(fake leftist).
Who might they be?
Advertisement
by Kavagrad » Sun Feb 03, 2019 11:29 am
Communal concils wrote:
I don't call liberals SJWs,I call them Liberals. I'm against Liberalism both socially and economically. I don't think their views do anything for the world. I believe in true social Justice, one that unites people of all races and cultures. The Left was never ruined, it has only been oppressed by the Leftoids(fake leftist).
by Communal concils » Sun Feb 03, 2019 11:29 am
by Upper Secundus » Sun Feb 03, 2019 11:30 am
by Vulga » Sun Feb 03, 2019 11:30 am
Kavagrad wrote:Communal concils wrote:
I don't call liberals SJWs,I call them Liberals. I'm against Liberalism both socially and economically. I don't think their views do anything for the world. I believe in true social Justice, one that unites people of all races and cultures. The Left was never ruined, it has only been oppressed by the Leftoids(fake leftist).
You know this is a terrible and obvious attempt at promoting Fascism, right? You're not subtle, and we're not fucking stupid.
by Communal concils » Sun Feb 03, 2019 11:32 am
Kavagrad wrote:Communal concils wrote:
I don't call liberals SJWs,I call them Liberals. I'm against Liberalism both socially and economically. I don't think their views do anything for the world. I believe in true social Justice, one that unites people of all races and cultures. The Left was never ruined, it has only been oppressed by the Leftoids(fake leftist).
You know this is a terrible and obvious attempt at promoting Fascism, right? You're not subtle, and we're not fucking stupid.
by Karu Nadu » Sun Feb 03, 2019 11:35 am
Communal concils wrote:Vulga wrote:Your definition of socialism is basically an authoritarian welfare state is which is far closer to fascism than socialism. You're a fascist not a socialist.
Didn't Lenin kill his opposition,didn't he did state capitalism.by everything he did, wouldn't he be fascist.Also I doudt that he would ever feel sympathy with homosexuals, stalin however was will to remove it.
by Communal concils » Sun Feb 03, 2019 11:36 am
Karu Nadu wrote:A political party needs other competition to exist as a "party". Otherwise, it just becomes an association of people, while a political party is an association of people with an idea so that they can defeat other parties.Communal concils wrote:To defeat Capitalism and counter-Revolutionaries ,one must be populist. The Working class aren't educated enough to control the state. There needs to be a responsible Oligarchy. One that challenges it's opposition, but also cleans it's self. This Oligarchy must be lead by a single party, and this party must lead a republic of self restriction .It should also consolidate power.
by Upper Secundus » Sun Feb 03, 2019 11:37 am
Karu Nadu wrote:Communal concils wrote:
Didn't Lenin kill his opposition,didn't he did state capitalism.by everything he did, wouldn't he be fascist.Also I doudt that he would ever feel sympathy with homosexuals, stalin however was will to remove it.
Apparently Lenin was a fascist parading around as a socialist. Probably one of those leftoid aliens Upper Secundus and Communal Concils told us about...
by Communal concils » Sun Feb 03, 2019 11:38 am
Communal concils wrote:Karu Nadu wrote:A political party needs other competition to exist as a "party". Otherwise, it just becomes an association of people, while a political party is an association of people with an idea so that they can defeat other parties.
That only really depends on the situation, I did say "means justify the ends".Let's not forget about the Dominated-party state(not one-Party state).They have elections, they have opposition, they are "Democracies".However they some how always get elected.
by Western Vale Confederacy » Sun Feb 03, 2019 11:39 am
by Communal concils » Sun Feb 03, 2019 11:39 am
by Vulga » Sun Feb 03, 2019 11:40 am
Communal concils wrote:Vulga wrote:Your definition of socialism is basically an authoritarian welfare state is which is far closer to fascism than socialism. You're a fascist not a socialist.
Didn't Lenin kill his opposition,didn't he did state capitalism.by everything he did, wouldn't he be fascist.Also I doudt that he would ever feel sympathy with homosexuals, stalin however was will to remove it.
by Communal concils » Sun Feb 03, 2019 11:42 am
by Upper Secundus » Sun Feb 03, 2019 11:42 am
by Upper Secundus » Sun Feb 03, 2019 11:46 am
by The South Falls » Sun Feb 03, 2019 11:46 am
by Crylante » Sun Feb 03, 2019 11:46 am
by Communal concils » Sun Feb 03, 2019 11:47 am
Vulga wrote:Communal concils wrote:
Didn't Lenin kill his opposition,didn't he did state capitalism.by everything he did, wouldn't he be fascist.Also I doudt that he would ever feel sympathy with homosexuals, stalin however was will to remove it.
He did kill his opposition to repress class enemies and counter-revolutionaries like the Whites, a pro-tsarist faction funded and supported by European empires and America. Lenin's goal was always communism, a classless, stateless, moneyless society, achieved through a global proletariat revolution starting in the industrialized Europe, not a bureaucratized state capitalist society completely isolated like you're promoting which is basically fascism. Also under Lenin's leadership, openly homosexuals were able to serve in government.
by Karu Nadu » Sun Feb 03, 2019 11:48 am
The South Falls wrote:
Feminazis... and here we go...
You do know you can't just kick out people, right?
by Upper Secundus » Sun Feb 03, 2019 11:49 am
The South Falls wrote:Feminazis... and here we go...
You do know you can't just kick out people, right?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Fauxia, Gnark, Great Eddy, Haganham, Ineva, La Paz de Los Ricos, Lunayria, Repreteop, Statesburg, Zurkerx
Advertisement