Xmara wrote:It's actually just the first one.
it is the first one by default, the second one by fast comparison to death toll of other threats, and possibly the third one, cannot evaluate
Xmara wrote:The risks of adverse side effects are so slim that it's not really something to worry about.
due to limits in understanding of biology i cannot evaluate risks of adverse side effects. neither can you or anyone using public intelligence
Xmara wrote:One of them is wrong and it ain't me.
it is also possible to argue with someone who is not arguing with you, in this case only you have possibility of wrong because only you have made argument.
consider following argument:
me: A or B or C
you: A, not B
in this argument, it is possible that we are both wrong, or it is possible that we are both right, or it is possible that i am right and you are wrong. however it is impossible for you to be wrong while i am right because your argument is one of several cases which are compatible with my argument
Xmara wrote:Ah, so this was all a game?
this is recreational internet conversation, it is word game. it cannot be work because no one pays me, it cannot be socialization because i am writing alone in apartment