Kowani wrote:I wasn’t aware that one had to agree with every single idea put out by a person in order to use some of their ideas. The Protestants on this thread probably don’t agree with Luther’s attacks on Jews. Einstein May have been wrong about the universal constant, but physics without his work would suck. I’m not sure why I get held to higher standards.Hakons wrote: Is this where you pretend to know anything about me? Oh. Yep! It is. Particularly since all but one your “reasonable” assumptions were completely wrong.
Sarcasm doesn’t work when you misread the context entirely, mate.
If you had bothered reading beyond the words “Occam’s Razor”, you’d have realized that I was using it to say that assuming that God had gone into Adam’s genes and made a bunch of mutations to make Eve at a greater rate than what would naturally happen is a bad argument. Didn’t use it to prove anything. Didn’t use it to disprove anything. Just discarded the idea of divine intervention beyond that which is already stated in the Bible. But no, you go ahead, try to score some more points.
I imagine it’s the irony of using a priests idea as anti-theist argument.