LWDT VI: Kropotkin's Bread Dead Redemption.

[Volkari]

So this is how liberty dies...

Plot twist: liberty is always a sockpuppet and has never been alive.

Liberty is only possible in the totalitarian whole where all members of the community become a part of the state through corporatism. Only when every individual sees himself as the State can freedom be realized.

[Democratic Communist Federation]

Liberty is only possible in the totalitarian whole where all members of the community become a part of the state through corporatism. Only when every individual sees himself as the State can freedom be realized.

Individuals are real. States are not.

[Northern Davincia]

If you can't use freedom to do stuff others don't like, you don't have freedom.

Freedom to do things that others dislike is fine.

Freedom to oppress or harm another, however (which Capitalism does :3) is no bueno.

Except that it doesn't.

[Volkari]

Liberty is only possible in the totalitarian whole where all members of the community become a part of the state through corporatism. Only when every individual sees himself as the State can freedom be realized.

Individuals are real. States are not.

I didn't peg you for a nominalist.

The state is the spiritual creation of individuals. It's an extension of the mind of the subjects that think it.

[Kowani]

Plot twist: liberty is always a sockpuppet and has never been alive.

Liberty is only possible in the totalitarian whole where all members of the community become a part of the state through corporatism. Only when every individual sees himself as the State can freedom be realized.

All kinds of no.

[Democratic Communist Federation]

I didn't peg you for a nominalist.

The state is the spiritual creation of individuals. It's an extension of the mind of the subjects that think it.

A nominalist would not say that individuals are real. A particularist might. However, I am a critical realist. What I wrote is based on critical realism.

[Volkari]

I didn't peg you for a nominalist.

The state is the spiritual creation of individuals. It's an extension of the mind of the subjects that think it.

A nominalist would not say that individuals are real. A particularist might. However, I am a critical realist. What I wrote is based on critical realism.

Yes they would, see Stirner's Der Einzige und sein Eigentum.

[Volkari]

Liberty is only possible in the totalitarian whole where all members of the community become a part of the state through corporatism. Only when every individual sees himself as the State can freedom be realized.

All kinds of no.

It's an inevitable outcome of the dialectical struggle between individualism and collectivism.

[Kowani]

All kinds of no.

It's an inevitable outcome of the dialectical struggle between individualism and collectivism.

Word salad that posits much while proving naught.

[Democratic Communist Federation]

Yes they would, see Stirner's Der Einzige und sein Eigentum.

Where did Max Stirner call himself a nominalist?

[Volkari]

Yes they would, see Stirner's Der Einzige und sein Eigentum.

Where did Max Stirner call himself a nominalist?

I don't know if he ever did, but his work is identified as radical nominalism. Whatever he called himself has no bearing.

[The Xenopolis Confederation]

Plot twist: liberty is always a sockpuppet and has never been alive.

Liberty is only possible in the totalitarian whole where all members of the community become a part of the state through corporatism. Only when every individual sees himself as the State can freedom be realized.

Liberty is only possible through totalitarianism. And war is peace, ignorance is strength and all that wholesome stuff.

[The Xenopolis Confederation]

All kinds of no.

It's an inevitable outcome of the dialectical struggle between individualism and collectivism.

The inevitable outcome is individualism winning by becoming collectivism?

[Volkari]

Liberty is only possible in the totalitarian whole where all members of the community become a part of the state through corporatism. Only when every individual sees himself as the State can freedom be realized.

Liberty is only possible through totalitarianism. And war is peace, ignorance is strength and all that wholesome stuff.

Yes, yes, I'm sure you totally read 1984 and not the SparkNotes.

[Democratic Communist Federation]

I don't know if he ever did, but his work is identified as radical nominalism. Whatever he called himself has no bearing.

He is also commonly identified as an anarchist. He attacked anarchism in his writings.

So, I repeat my question: Where did Stirner ever identify himself as a nominalist?

[Pasong Tirad]

Liberty is only possible through totalitarianism. And war is peace, ignorance is strength and all that wholesome stuff.

Yes, yes, I'm sure you totally read 1984 and not the SparkNotes.

That's it, we're all done guys, he's seen right through us. We don't actually read anything. Let's all pack up and leave he wins the internet.

[Volkari]

Yes, yes, I'm sure you totally read 1984 and not the SparkNotes.

That's it, we're all done guys, he's seen right through us. We don't actually read anything. Let's all pack up and leave he wins the internet.

Clearly you don't if you think that 1984 is everything.

[The Xenopolis Confederation]

Liberty is only possible through totalitarianism. And war is peace, ignorance is strength and all that wholesome stuff.

Yes, yes, I'm sure you totally read 1984 and not the SparkNotes.

I have read 1984. It's a pretty good book. Don't see how whether or not I've read it makes your point any less or more stupid and contradictory.

[Pasong Tirad]

That's it, we're all done guys, he's seen right through us. We don't actually read anything. Let's all pack up and leave he wins the internet.

Clearly you don't if you think that 1984 is everything.

Please try and point out where I said that.

[Volkari]

Clearly you don't if you think that 1984 is everything.

Please try and point out where I said that.

That's it, we're all done guys, he's seen right through us. We don't actually read anything. Let's all pack up and leave he wins the internet.

In response to me sarcastically noting that Xenopolis probably never read 1984 like 99% of people who reference that book.

[Volkari]

Good anarkitties don't spoil sequels.

Whoa now, you silly statist! I'm an anarkitty, which means I don't gotta listen to you! >:^3

[Pasong Tirad]

Please try and point out where I said that.

That's it, we're all done guys, he's seen right through us. We don't actually read anything. Let's all pack up and leave he wins the internet.

In response to me sarcastically noting that Xenopolis probably never read 1984 like 99% of people who reference that book.

Right, but where there did I mention that "1984 is everything"?

And you must think so low of people to actually believe that "99% of people who reference that book" haven't read it.

[Volkari]

Right, but where there did I mention that "1984 is everything"?

When you somehow grasped that "probably never read 1984" equals "people on the internet never read ever."

And you must think so low of people to actually believe that "99% of people who reference that book" haven't read it.

It's a product of a Southern childhood having to listen to people like Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck.

[Pasong Tirad]

Right, but where there did I mention that "1984 is everything"?

When you somehow grasped that "probably never read 1984" equals "people on the internet never read ever."

What you just said makes no sense to me.

And you must think so low of people to actually believe that "99% of people who reference that book" haven't read it.

It's a product of a Southern childhood having to listen to people like Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck.

Great. Still wrong, though.

[The Xenopolis Confederation]

Please try and point out where I said that.

That's it, we're all done guys, he's seen right through us. We don't actually read anything. Let's all pack up and leave he wins the internet.

In response to me sarcastically noting that Xenopolis probably never read 1984 like 99% of people who reference that book.

Why don't you think anyone's read 1984?