Telconi wrote:Doing it Rightland wrote:Hey, you two, come on. We should be trying to have a civil discussion on this issue, and if neither of you can stay calm, we're not gonna get anywhere. Now, to repeat what I stated earlier:
It is absolutely necessary to restrict the majority's capacity to govern. Hence why we've been doing it since the beginning of the country.
Yes that is what we have constitutions for to limit what the government can do. But what we dont do is give the minority more power than majority and the ability to veto what the majority wants done legislatively or voted for in an election
Its not functionally incomplete you simply dont want to give an answer because it presents a major flaw in your argument