But plenty of other Western democracies have. But it seems to only apply if you insult Muslims or The Chosen People.
Advertisement
by Vassenor » Sat Nov 10, 2018 10:22 am
Sokolovra wrote:Vassenor wrote:
Oh really? Show us then.
https://www.thenational.ae/world/europe/woman-who-insulted-the-prophet-mohammed-loses-free-speech-case-at-the-european-court-of-human-rights-1.784583
https://www.osce.org/odihr/103522?download=true
https://www.theverge.com/2016/3/24/11297128/matthew-doyle-arrest-muslim-tweet-brussels
And of course:
https://reason.com/blog/2018/05/30/uk-arrests-anti-muslim-activist-for-film
by Ifreann » Sat Nov 10, 2018 10:32 am
by Sokolovra » Sat Nov 10, 2018 10:38 am
by Hurdergaryp » Sat Nov 10, 2018 10:45 am
Sokolovra wrote:Ifreann wrote:So...you want us to keep our blasphemy law and start locking people up?
The point i am trying to make is that Blasphemy laws and anti-hate speech laws seem to only apply if you are insulting Muslims and Jews. This blasphemy law that is being repealed will mean it is no longer viable to prosecute someone for insulting Christianity or Christians, but no doubt there will be some anti-hate speech laws to prosecute those who insult Muslims and Jews.
by Vassenor » Sat Nov 10, 2018 10:47 am
Sokolovra wrote:Ifreann wrote:So...you want us to keep our blasphemy law and start locking people up?
The point i am trying to make is that Blasphemy laws and anti-hate speech laws seem to only apply if you are insulting Muslims and Jews. This blasphemy law that is being repealed will mean it is no longer viable to prosecute someone for insulting Christianity or Christians, but no doubt there will be some anti-hate speech laws to prosecute those who insult Muslims and Jews.
by LiberNovusAmericae » Sat Nov 10, 2018 11:36 am
by Ifreann » Sat Nov 10, 2018 11:41 am
Sokolovra wrote:Ifreann wrote:So...you want us to keep our blasphemy law and start locking people up?
The point i am trying to make is that Blasphemy laws and anti-hate speech laws seem to only apply if you are insulting Muslims and Jews. This blasphemy law that is being repealed will mean it is no longer viable to prosecute someone for insulting Christianity or Christians, but no doubt there will be some anti-hate speech laws to prosecute those who insult Muslims and Jews.
by The Huskar Social Union » Sat Nov 10, 2018 11:45 am
Sokolovra wrote:Ireland is turning into another shithole... First the legitimization of Homosexuality, then abortion, and now this....
by Hurdergaryp » Sat Nov 10, 2018 3:31 pm
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Sokolovra wrote:Ireland is turning into another shithole... First the legitimization of Homosexuality, then abortion, and now this....
Nothing wrong with gay people, nothing wrong with giving women the right to abortion safely at home instead of having to go elsewhere, and there is nothing wrong with getting rid of retarded outdated blasphemy laws. So no ireland is doing fine actually, despite some of the actual real problems it has such as issues with housing.
by Sokolovra » Sun Dec 02, 2018 9:27 am
Hurdergaryp wrote:The Huskar Social Union wrote:Nothing wrong with gay people, nothing wrong with giving women the right to abortion safely at home instead of having to go elsewhere, and there is nothing wrong with getting rid of retarded outdated blasphemy laws. So no ireland is doing fine actually, despite some of the actual real problems it has such as issues with housing.
The difference between you and the person you are disagreeing with is that you are a decent human being, while he prominently displays a swastika in his flag. Sure, it probably ain't the kind of swastika that is prohibited according to the rules, but it's quite telling.
by Vassenor » Sun Dec 02, 2018 9:32 am
Sokolovra wrote:Hurdergaryp wrote:The difference between you and the person you are disagreeing with is that you are a decent human being, while he prominently displays a swastika in his flag. Sure, it probably ain't the kind of swastika that is prohibited according to the rules, but it's quite telling.
You literally have an Arrow Cross, which is no better than the Kolovrat.
by The Huskar Social Union » Sun Dec 02, 2018 9:37 am
Sokolovra wrote:Hurdergaryp wrote:The difference between you and the person you are disagreeing with is that you are a decent human being, while he prominently displays a swastika in his flag. Sure, it probably ain't the kind of swastika that is prohibited according to the rules, but it's quite telling.
You literally have an Arrow Cross, which is no better than the Kolovrat.
Its a variation of the swastika and depends entirely on the context and use of it. Many people dont like it as its used by ultra nationalist or neo nazi groups.
by Trump-Pence » Sun Dec 02, 2018 9:38 am
by Sokolovra » Sun Dec 02, 2018 9:38 am
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Sokolovra wrote:
You literally have an Arrow Cross, which is no better than the Kolovrat.
Thats the eight pointed star of chaos from Warhammer 40k.Its a variation of the swastika and depends entirely on the context and use of it. Many people dont like it as its used by ultra nationalist or neo nazi groups and would be a reason why people dont like it.Sokolovra wrote:
I stand corrected on that. But what is actually wrong with having a Kolovrat?
by Vassenor » Sun Dec 02, 2018 9:40 am
Trump-Pence wrote:"I mean, there are a lot of different versions of blasphemy, and it really depends on what you think of the word," stutters the Minister of Foreign Affairs, holding two beautiful women by his side when reporters started pursuing him about it "sure uh, some people deserve to pay for blasphemy, but don't we have repentance for that?...[Blashpemy], it just doesn't make sense"
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Angevin-Romanov Crimea, James_xenoland, Neu California, Spirit of Hope, Stellar Colonies, The Xenopolis Confederation, Unmet Player, Xind
Advertisement