Advertisement
by Fauxia » Thu Nov 29, 2018 2:11 pm
by All Wild Things » Thu Nov 29, 2018 3:50 pm
Fauxia wrote:Comparing a community (a historic region) or actual prehistoric artwork to some meaningless legislation in a game is a little much, don’t you think?
Especially the artwork.
10 years, several thousand, who cares? Same diff.
by Kuriko » Thu Nov 29, 2018 4:02 pm
by Jar Wattinree » Thu Nov 29, 2018 4:06 pm
by Lord Dominator » Thu Nov 29, 2018 4:10 pm
by Jar Wattinree » Thu Nov 29, 2018 4:28 pm
Lord Dominator wrote:Repealing something doesn't magically make its impact or meaning go away. If we didn't think it was worthwhile, this replacement wouldn't exist.
Better documentation is all that is desired.
by Marshite Ponies » Sat Dec 01, 2018 3:50 pm
by All Wild Things » Sun Dec 02, 2018 4:10 am
Jar Wattinree wrote:I'd argue that the new Condemnation would actually serve better as a history book than the first Condemn did. I never got what Macedon did when I was new to the game, it was just a dead region with few embassies to its name. The new one has much more detail and would serve future generations of NSers to come.
by Kuriko » Sun Dec 02, 2018 12:16 pm
All Wild Things wrote:Hi,
I'm questioning the legality of this proposal, as I think it contains duplication. The original SC1 condemns Macedon for its actions against France. This proposal also condemns Macedon for its actions against France.Jar Wattinree wrote:I'd argue that the new Condemnation would actually serve better as a history book than the first Condemn did. I never got what Macedon did when I was new to the game, it was just a dead region with few embassies to its name. The new one has much more detail and would serve future generations of NSers to come.
I don't think the SC was intended to be a history book. It's intended to reflect opinions that were current at the time. Over time, it becomes a source of first-hand historical artefacts. I've no problem with people writing detailed histories of regions (I've written two) but I don't see the need for history to be passed into law. I certainly don't see value in destroying an original historical artefact to replace it with a history book.
by All Wild Things » Sun Dec 02, 2018 4:49 pm
Kuriko wrote:I stated this in the TRR forum, and ill state it here. Before I started drafting this proposal I spoke to Wrapper on Discord about the duplication rule. He said that as long as I don't mention the garish WFEs, and as long as it contains a lot more info than SC#1, it won't fall afoul of duplication.
by Wrapper » Sun Dec 02, 2018 8:22 pm
by Imperium Anglorum » Mon Dec 03, 2018 1:29 am
by Todd McCloud » Mon Dec 03, 2018 5:25 am
by Lord Dominator » Mon Dec 03, 2018 8:21 am
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Are people actually making the argument that if something appeared in a resolution in the past, even if that resolution were repealed, it can never be mentioned again?
by Frattastan IV » Mon Dec 03, 2018 8:37 am
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Are people actually making the argument that if something appeared in a resolution in the past, even if that resolution were repealed, it can never be mentioned again?
Draganisia wrote:Also it seems the next war could be NPO fighting directly against Pacifica.
by Kuriko » Mon Dec 03, 2018 10:05 am
Frattastan IV wrote:Imperium Anglorum wrote:Are people actually making the argument that if something appeared in a resolution in the past, even if that resolution were repealed, it can never be mentioned again?
Only because the replacement will pass before the repeal of the original.
Although Kuriko herself was arguing what you mentioned (that someone that cannot be C&C'd for the same action even if the original resolution was repealed) in another topic.
by Neo Domais » Tue Dec 04, 2018 4:22 pm
by Lord Dominator » Tue Dec 04, 2018 4:39 pm
Neo Domais wrote:Yeah no, will be voting against. There dead, there a dead region, if you dislike them then you are you giving them a second badge of honor?
by Mr Bubbly » Tue Dec 04, 2018 5:03 pm
by Kuriko » Tue Dec 04, 2018 8:43 pm
by Yokiria » Tue Dec 04, 2018 10:11 pm
by Cormactopia Prime » Tue Dec 04, 2018 10:27 pm
Yokiria wrote:Kuriko also already has an SC badge or two, on their previous nation, so accusations of badge-hunting are ill-informed.
by Lord Dominator » Tue Dec 04, 2018 10:30 pm
Cormactopia Prime wrote:My vote is usually determined by the majority of WA nations in Pacifica though, so it's subject to change.
by Monetillia » Tue Dec 04, 2018 10:35 pm
by Kuriko » Tue Dec 04, 2018 10:36 pm
Cormactopia Prime wrote:Yokiria wrote:Kuriko also already has an SC badge or two, on their previous nation, so accusations of badge-hunting are ill-informed.
This. ^
This is a very well written proposal, and I'm glad to vote for it. I'm not sure I'm going to vote for repeal of SC#1 though. We'll see.
My vote is usually determined by the majority of WA nations in Pacifica though, so it's subject to change.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement