NATION

PASSWORD

UK Politics Thread VIII—Can't Let EU Go

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

If a general election were held today who would you vote for?

Conservatives
126
16%
Labour
229
30%
Liberal Democrats
130
17%
Greens
39
5%
UKIP
135
18%
SNP
26
3%
Plaid Cymru
7
1%
Sinn Fein/SDLP
27
4%
DUP/UUP
12
2%
Other
35
5%
 
Total votes : 766

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Fri Nov 16, 2018 8:25 am

Greater vakolicci haven wrote:
Caracasus wrote:
Voted to leave by a gnat's pube. Given the abysmal handling of the negotiations, and various successive polls, I'm not really seeing much evidence of a set in stone mandate really.

Anyway, given that referendums (including the, you know, set in stone one) are advisory, can't be much harm in taking the national temperature again, so to speak.

Pretty sure you wouldn't be arguing for this if the result had been the opposite.


If the result had been the opposite, we wouldn't have had two years of absolute morons shooting us in the collective foot.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 70682
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
New York Times Democracy

Postby Vassenor » Fri Nov 16, 2018 8:54 am

Greater vakolicci haven wrote:
Caracasus wrote:
Voted to leave by a gnat's pube. Given the abysmal handling of the negotiations, and various successive polls, I'm not really seeing much evidence of a set in stone mandate really.

Anyway, given that referendums (including the, you know, set in stone one) are advisory, can't be much harm in taking the national temperature again, so to speak.

Pretty sure you wouldn't be arguing for this if the result had been the opposite.


You mean like Nigel "the matter will only be considered settled with a two-thirds majority" Farage?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Jakker
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 2934
Founded: May 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Jakker » Fri Nov 16, 2018 9:07 am

LiberNovusAmericae wrote:Don't bother. Strawmanning is Vassenor's favorite debate tactic.


If you're going to criticize someone's way of debating, maybe engage in the debate as well. I know that you get into a lot of heated back and forth with Vassenor, but don't bring that into other threads without additional contribution. Otherwise, it might be time to start ignoring each other/putting the other on your foe's list. Don't just use threads as an excuse to attack the other.
Last edited by Jakker on Fri Nov 16, 2018 9:08 am, edited 2 times in total.
One Stop Rules Shop
Getting Help Request (GHR)

The Bruce wrote:Mostly I feel sorry for [raiders], because they put in all this effort and at the end of the day have nothing to show for it and have created nothing.

User avatar
Philjia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12596
Founded: Sep 15, 2014
New York Times Democracy

Postby Philjia » Fri Nov 16, 2018 9:14 am

It's revolving doors time! Amber Rudd, who resigned as home secretary in April following the Windrush scandal, will be returning to the Cabinet as the Work and Pensions Secretary.
Last edited by Philjia on Fri Nov 16, 2018 9:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
"I had nightmares I thought were really horrible until I woke up and remembered what reality was at the moment." - Iain M Banks, Consider Phlebas

User avatar
Hurdergaryp
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43278
Founded: Jul 10, 2016
Democratic Socialists

Postby Hurdergaryp » Fri Nov 16, 2018 9:25 am

Philjia wrote:It's revolving doors time! Amber Rudd, who resigned as home secretary in April, will be returning to the Cabinet as the Work and Pensions Secretary.

Always good to have something to do again after enjoying your sabbatical.


“Everything under heaven is in utter chaos; the situation is excellent.”
Mao Zedong

User avatar
Shamhnan Insir
Minister
 
Posts: 3169
Founded: Jul 08, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby Shamhnan Insir » Fri Nov 16, 2018 9:28 am

Salandriagado wrote:
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Pretty sure you wouldn't be arguing for this if the result had been the opposite.


If the result had been the opposite, we wouldn't have had two years of absolute morons shooting us in the collective foot.

If we wanted to play the game of considering "what ifs" then Cameron would have remained as PM, at least initially. Brexit whilst being put to bed for the immediacy would not have gone away as a consideration, I'm quite sure UKIP would probably receive a few more votes until the moguls at the top began tire of those headlines and potentially focus media spotlights and pressures elsewhere. What a Cameron/Trump relationship would look like would certainly create some waves.
If the vote had been as tight the other way around then we would have seen a government either taking steps to pursue other options within the EU, or a government actually having some balls and level-headed thinkers to sort out the domestic issues that were often blamed on the EU.
Call me Sham

-"Governments may think and say as they like, but force cannot be eliminated, and it is the only real and unanswerable power. We are told that the pen is mightier than the sword, but I know which of these weapons I would choose." Sir Adrian Paul Ghislain Carton de Wiart VC, KBE, CB, CMG, DSO.

Nationalism is an infantile disease, it is the measles of humanity.
Darwinish Brentsylvania wrote:Shamhnan Insir started this wonderful tranquility, ALL PRAISE THE SHEPHERD KING

User avatar
Philjia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12596
Founded: Sep 15, 2014
New York Times Democracy

Postby Philjia » Fri Nov 16, 2018 9:34 am

Stephen Barclay, formerly a minister at the Department of Health and Social Care, is the new Brexit Secretary.
"I had nightmares I thought were really horrible until I woke up and remembered what reality was at the moment." - Iain M Banks, Consider Phlebas

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 70682
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
New York Times Democracy

Postby Vassenor » Fri Nov 16, 2018 9:40 am

Philjia wrote:Stephen Barclay, formerly a minister at the Department of Health and Social Care, is the new Brexit Secretary.


So the office isn't being binned just yet?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Philjia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12596
Founded: Sep 15, 2014
New York Times Democracy

Postby Philjia » Fri Nov 16, 2018 9:43 am

Vassenor wrote:
Philjia wrote:Stephen Barclay, formerly a minister at the Department of Health and Social Care, is the new Brexit Secretary.


So the office isn't being binned just yet?

This is Barclay's first cabinet role so presumably he's very much in May's pocket. Rudd's also a reliable ally of May, since she took the fall for the Windrush scandal May caused.
Last edited by Philjia on Fri Nov 16, 2018 9:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
"I had nightmares I thought were really horrible until I woke up and remembered what reality was at the moment." - Iain M Banks, Consider Phlebas

User avatar
An Alan Smithee Nation
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7569
Founded: Apr 18, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby An Alan Smithee Nation » Fri Nov 16, 2018 9:56 am

So does Mogg just not have the support he thought he had?
Everything is intertwinkled

User avatar
Hurdergaryp
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43278
Founded: Jul 10, 2016
Democratic Socialists

Postby Hurdergaryp » Fri Nov 16, 2018 10:03 am

An Alan Smithee Nation wrote:So does Mogg just not have the support he thought he had?

Clearly he needs to call in the mothership hiding behind Jupiter.


“Everything under heaven is in utter chaos; the situation is excellent.”
Mao Zedong

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 70682
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
New York Times Democracy

Postby Vassenor » Fri Nov 16, 2018 10:04 am

An Alan Smithee Nation wrote:So does Mogg just not have the support he thought he had?


Well so far there's only 21 confirmed letters of no-confidence.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Philjia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12596
Founded: Sep 15, 2014
New York Times Democracy

Postby Philjia » Fri Nov 16, 2018 10:22 am

An Alan Smithee Nation wrote:So does Mogg just not have the support he thought he had?

The Tories are known for many things but doing things quickly isn't one of them. It's still quite possible the number of letters needed to trigger a no confidence vote has been reached, but not all of them have been processed and not everyone who sent one will have made it public. On top of that, there's probably plenty of MPs delaying a decision until they've been able to consult with their constituents.
"I had nightmares I thought were really horrible until I woke up and remembered what reality was at the moment." - Iain M Banks, Consider Phlebas

User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Fri Nov 16, 2018 11:55 am


User avatar
Greater vakolicci haven
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18668
Founded: May 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater vakolicci haven » Fri Nov 16, 2018 11:58 am


Super-loyal to May.
Join the rejected realms and never fear rejection again
NSG virtual happy hour this Saturday: join us on zoom, what could possibly go wrong?
“I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.” - Thomas Jefferson
“Silent acquiescence in the face of tyranny is no better than outright agreement." - C.J. Redwine
“The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles." - Jeff Cooper

User avatar
Trumptonium1
Senator
 
Posts: 4022
Founded: Apr 03, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Trumptonium1 » Fri Nov 16, 2018 12:16 pm

Why are they still trying to push Rudd down everyone's throats

Literally nobody likes her
Preferred pronouns: His Majesty/Your Highness

https://www.bolsonaro.com.br/
Resident Non-Pumpkin Character

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60555
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Fri Nov 16, 2018 12:18 pm

Trumptonium1 wrote:Why are they still trying to push Rudd down everyone's throats

Literally nobody likes her


Because her peers like her and they are out of touch.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Philjia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12596
Founded: Sep 15, 2014
New York Times Democracy

Postby Philjia » Fri Nov 16, 2018 12:36 pm

Trumptonium1 wrote:Why are they still trying to push Rudd down everyone's throats

Literally nobody likes her

May likes Rudd and Rudd likes May.
"I had nightmares I thought were really horrible until I woke up and remembered what reality was at the moment." - Iain M Banks, Consider Phlebas

User avatar
Caracasus
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7918
Founded: Apr 23, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Caracasus » Fri Nov 16, 2018 12:40 pm

Philjia wrote:
Trumptonium1 wrote:Why are they still trying to push Rudd down everyone's throats

Literally nobody likes her

May likes Rudd and Rudd likes May.


Let's face it, it's not like she's exactly got the best and brightest to choose from either.
As an editor I seam to spend an awful lot of thyme going threw issues and checking that they're no oblivious errars. Its a tough job but someone's got too do it!



Issues editor, not a moderator.

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43429
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
New York Times Democracy

Postby Fartsniffage » Fri Nov 16, 2018 12:50 pm

Caracasus wrote:
Philjia wrote:May likes Rudd and Rudd likes May.


Let's face it, it's not like she's exactly got the best and brightest to choose from either.


What happened to the heavy weights in both parties?

User avatar
Philjia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12596
Founded: Sep 15, 2014
New York Times Democracy

Postby Philjia » Fri Nov 16, 2018 1:21 pm

Image


Perhaps don't have your low key meetings in a restaurant?
Last edited by Philjia on Fri Nov 16, 2018 1:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"I had nightmares I thought were really horrible until I woke up and remembered what reality was at the moment." - Iain M Banks, Consider Phlebas

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Fri Nov 16, 2018 1:59 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Caracasus wrote:
Let's face it, it's not like she's exactly got the best and brightest to choose from either.


What happened to the heavy weights in both parties?


Not stupid enough to put themselves in a place where they might end up having to take the blame for Brexit.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Greater vakolicci haven
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18668
Founded: May 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater vakolicci haven » Fri Nov 16, 2018 2:11 pm

Salandriagado wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
What happened to the heavy weights in both parties?


Not stupid enough to put themselves in a place where they might end up having to take the blame for Brexit.

What blame? It'll go well
Join the rejected realms and never fear rejection again
NSG virtual happy hour this Saturday: join us on zoom, what could possibly go wrong?
“I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.” - Thomas Jefferson
“Silent acquiescence in the face of tyranny is no better than outright agreement." - C.J. Redwine
“The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles." - Jeff Cooper

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Fri Nov 16, 2018 2:13 pm

Greater vakolicci haven wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Not stupid enough to put themselves in a place where they might end up having to take the blame for Brexit.

What blame? It'll go well


:rofl:
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19917
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Souseiseki » Fri Nov 16, 2018 2:30 pm

Philjia wrote:It's revolving doors time! Amber Rudd, who resigned as home secretary in April following the Windrush scandal, will be returning to the Cabinet as the Work and Pensions Secretary.


do you think that people will stop referring to disgraced former defence secretary liam fox as disgraced former defence secretary liam fox now that disgraced former home secretary amber rudd is on the scene?
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: -Saiwania-, Armeriea, Chan Island, Corgeia, Crumpetopia, Dumb Ideologies, Greater Britannian Realm, Orlavia, Outer Armatonisdaristan, Platypus Bureaucracy, Yerachmeal

Advertisement

Remove ads