Xoriet wrote:Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:Also, what’s with offering evidence to other GCR leaders while refusing to let the accused see detail/evidence of what they’re accused of?
That's not entirely an uncommon practice though. Trading information on problematic members with close allies for them to be able to decide if they want said members in their region isn't unheard of. It's not exactly a good practice and can lead to trouble (see: Imki and TNP) but it's nothing new or extraordinary. I think it's fair to do so in cases of legitimate OOC harassment, but only if the evidence can legitimately endanger victims who reported it. Usually this is the standard by which this policy operates among regional leaders and admin teams. It can be justified sometimes, but it can also lead to serious consequences.
If there were serious endangerment going on, I doubt the ban would've been anything other than a permanent one, rather than the 8 months Tim and Escade got.