Advertisement
by Zone 71 » Fri Aug 24, 2018 8:43 am
by Rovikstead » Fri Aug 24, 2018 2:54 pm
Zone 71 wrote:In less than 24 hours, the proposal has surpassed half of the delegate approvals needed to reach quorum. With around 48 hours to go, and at 67 approvals, the proposal now needs only 12 more delegates to approve of this legislation. Thank you, everyone, for your support! Hopefully this will make it to vote!
The Glorious Third Reign of Templedom wrote:** RED FLAG ** . ** RING CHURCH BELLS ** . ** BESTIALITY ALERT ** . ** CHRISTIANS TAKE COVER **
by Cosmopolitan borovan » Fri Aug 24, 2018 4:42 pm
Zone 71 wrote:The proposal has reached quorum and is on queue for vote on the General Assembly floor! Thank you everyone for your support!
by Separatist Peoples » Fri Aug 24, 2018 5:12 pm
Zone 71 wrote:The proposal has reached quorum and is on queue for vote on the General Assembly floor! Thank you everyone for your support!
by Marshite Ponies » Sat Aug 25, 2018 1:25 am
by Rovikstead » Sat Aug 25, 2018 9:21 am
Marshite Ponies wrote:"The Republic of Akila is intrigued by this proposal and, after some review, finds currently no compelling reason it should lack its support," Ambassador Twilight Sparkle said, the ink on her quill about to run dry as she wrote down the notes on the debate, "and is proud to say it will vote for a resolution to help solve such a potentially critical problem before it becomes a tragedy for so many."
The Glorious Third Reign of Templedom wrote:** RED FLAG ** . ** RING CHURCH BELLS ** . ** BESTIALITY ALERT ** . ** CHRISTIANS TAKE COVER **
by Uan aa Boa » Sat Aug 25, 2018 4:49 pm
by Rovikstead » Sun Aug 26, 2018 7:13 am
Uan aa Boa wrote:Congratulations on making quorum and everything, but I urge you to withdraw and fix the many problems with this proposal before allowing it to go to vote.
It's about freshwater shortages but one of only two mandatory and non-committee clauses concerns dumping in the ocean. It's in a category described as improving the environment at the expense of industry yet the other mandatory clause is about public education. There's no clarity here.
Let's pick just one sentence - "Prohibits member nations or any businesses contained wherein from disposing hazardous waste into oceanic bodies, international waters, and the public drinking supply." You mean therein, not wherein. You should say disposing of hazardous waste. And what stops Pollution Inc from forming a not-for-profit subsidiary which, because it's not a business, can dump its parent company's waste wherever it likes? Can the military and other entities that are neither nations nor businesses also do as they please?
Uan aa Boa wrote:The rest of the resolution is equally riddled with grammatical and stylistic errors.
I support your intent, but this is simply not ready. I made a longer list of points prior to submission but sadly received no response.
The Glorious Third Reign of Templedom wrote:** RED FLAG ** . ** RING CHURCH BELLS ** . ** BESTIALITY ALERT ** . ** CHRISTIANS TAKE COVER **
by Xanthal » Sun Aug 26, 2018 11:33 am
by Rovikstead » Tue Aug 28, 2018 9:02 am
The Glorious Third Reign of Templedom wrote:** RED FLAG ** . ** RING CHURCH BELLS ** . ** BESTIALITY ALERT ** . ** CHRISTIANS TAKE COVER **
by Imperium Anglorum » Tue Aug 28, 2018 11:52 am
by Danyl » Tue Aug 28, 2018 3:59 pm
by Luizebaland » Thu Aug 30, 2018 11:28 am
by Sakaryata » Fri Aug 31, 2018 7:52 am
by Hessere » Fri Aug 31, 2018 9:34 am
Sakaryata wrote:The resolution is misdirected.It targets industries and domestic entities to reduce water consumption while globally (real world),agriculture accounts for about 70% of water usage (wikipedia).So,do some research before you write.Also ,this resolution lacks focus on usage efficiency instead relying solely on regulatory measures which,again results from lack of sufficient thought and effort .
by Sakaryata » Fri Aug 31, 2018 9:50 am
Hessere wrote:Sakaryata wrote:The resolution is misdirected.It targets industries and domestic entities to reduce water consumption while globally (real world),agriculture accounts for about 70% of water usage (wikipedia).So,do some research before you write.Also ,this resolution lacks focus on usage efficiency instead relying solely on regulatory measures which,again results from lack of sufficient thought and effort .
This isn't the real world
by Imperium Anglorum » Fri Aug 31, 2018 10:24 am
by Neo-Routhengard » Sat Sep 01, 2018 5:47 am
The United Kingdom of Neo-Routhengard accepts wastewater from all WA delegates and converts it to freshwater free of charge. For details, consult Michel Nicole Demetrius, representative of the United Kingdom of Neo-Routhengard in the World Assembly.
P.S. Please return paper to the WA representative after reading.
by Araraukar » Tue Sep 04, 2018 4:41 pm
Convention on Freshwater Shortages was passed 12,864 votes to 2,161.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Cosmopolitan borovan » Tue Sep 04, 2018 8:04 pm
Araraukar wrote:OOC: Nobody even bothered to post the results?Convention on Freshwater Shortages was passed 12,864 votes to 2,161.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement