No, I said you were treating someone else as a victim of feminism, when they're not. Because you can't go on any gender/sex related thread without doing so.
Follow along please.
Advertisement

by New haven america » Thu Aug 16, 2018 8:59 pm

by Costa Fierro » Thu Aug 16, 2018 9:01 pm
Galloism wrote:This is an absurd overreaction to the problem of clickbait.

by Galloism » Thu Aug 16, 2018 9:03 pm
Costa Fierro wrote:Galloism wrote:This is an absurd overreaction to the problem of clickbait.
Why is this an overreaction? If you have a reputation, a marriage, and a substantial income (half a million every month), of course you're going to take steps to ensure that it's protected as much as it can be. It's no different to a corporate CEO refusing to work with female subordinates or other women staff because of the potential for serious accusations to be made against him. Remember, we're in the #MeToo era now.

by Costa Fierro » Thu Aug 16, 2018 9:05 pm

by New haven america » Thu Aug 16, 2018 9:06 pm
Galloism wrote:Costa Fierro wrote:
Why is this an overreaction? If you have a reputation, a marriage, and a substantial income (half a million every month), of course you're going to take steps to ensure that it's protected as much as it can be. It's no different to a corporate CEO refusing to work with female subordinates or other women staff because of the potential for serious accusations to be made against him. Remember, we're in the #MeToo era now.
1. Wait, he makes half a million a month playing video games?
2. I have gone terribly wrong somewhere.

by New haven america » Thu Aug 16, 2018 9:06 pm
Costa Fierro wrote:New haven america wrote:No, I said you were treating someone else as a victim of feminism, when they're not. Because you can't go on any gender/sex related thread without doing so.
Follow along please.
I would, but I'd rather talk with other people who are interested in discussing this properly.

by Fartsniffage » Thu Aug 16, 2018 9:07 pm
Galloism wrote:Costa Fierro wrote:
Why is this an overreaction? If you have a reputation, a marriage, and a substantial income (half a million every month), of course you're going to take steps to ensure that it's protected as much as it can be. It's no different to a corporate CEO refusing to work with female subordinates or other women staff because of the potential for serious accusations to be made against him. Remember, we're in the #MeToo era now.
Wait, he makes half a million a month playing video games?
I have gone terribly wrong somewhere.

by Galloism » Thu Aug 16, 2018 9:21 pm

by Costa Fierro » Thu Aug 16, 2018 9:21 pm
Galloism wrote:Wait, he makes half a million a month playing video games?

by Bombadil » Thu Aug 16, 2018 9:23 pm

by New haven america » Thu Aug 16, 2018 9:24 pm

by Galloism » Thu Aug 16, 2018 9:25 pm
Costa Fierro wrote:Galloism wrote:Wait, he makes half a million a month playing video games?
I misred the Wikipedia article. It's over half a million.

by Costa Fierro » Thu Aug 16, 2018 9:40 pm
Galloism wrote:Holy crap.
Well I can see why he’d want to protect himself from danger, although I would still argue this isn’t the best way, just as I didn’t think it was the best way when this happened.
Consistency is important.
New haven america wrote:Wait, you really think someone here's going to take you seriously?

by New haven america » Thu Aug 16, 2018 9:47 pm
Costa Fierro wrote:Galloism wrote:Holy crap.
Well I can see why he’d want to protect himself from danger, although I would still argue this isn’t the best way, just as I didn’t think it was the best way when this happened.
Consistency is important.
It is important, but I view this as the most logical way to go about this. Similar things are being done in the corporate sphere.New haven america wrote:Wait, you really think someone here's going to take you seriously?
1.People usually do.


by Washington Resistance Army » Thu Aug 16, 2018 9:48 pm

by Pope Joan » Thu Aug 16, 2018 11:05 pm

by Western-Ukraine » Fri Aug 17, 2018 12:22 am
Factbooks: National Politics
Region: U R N

by Costa Fierro » Fri Aug 17, 2018 12:26 am
Western-Ukraine wrote:It's his choice who to play with, and if he's getting married, it's all the better that he takes caution with other women. Nothing about discrimination at all. Humans are all too fickle under pressure.

by Western-Ukraine » Fri Aug 17, 2018 12:29 am
Factbooks: National Politics
Region: U R N

by Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft » Fri Aug 17, 2018 4:02 am
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:Last year, I brought you a thread about Mike Pence avoiding temptation for adultery. This thread is similar but distinct, as it is about a guy who doesn't claim he's particularly tempted to commit adultery... but that others will think he is.
https://www.polygon.com/2018/8/13/17684 ... e-valkyraeNinja, aka Tyler Blevins, Twitch’s biggest streamer, told Polygon last week that he doesn’t play with female gamers. The decision, he explained, is rooted in internet culture rather than discriminatory intent — Blevins said he believes that that any possible hint of flirting during a stream will immediately be “clickbait forever.” In his words, “The only way to avoid that [gossip] is to not play with [women] at all.”
Blevins’ comments, seen as a product of internet culture by some and sexist by others, sparked discourse among fans, Twitch streamers and YouTube personalities who each shared their own thoughts on the matter.
Imane “Pokimane” Anys said during a stream last Saturday, “It sucks that things like [Blevins’ decision] have to be made into a big deal when I don’t think they have to be.” Anys is no stranger to Twitch popularity and scrutiny — after she began to stream Fortnite with pro player Ali “Myth” Kabbani, the pair have been dogged by dating rumors. Furthermore, she argued that Blevins’ claims that he hasn’t received criticism from female streamers were due to the fact that he hadn’t publicly spoken about his decision before, rather than a lack of objection.
Reaction quickly spread across Twitter, some agreeing with Blevins’ statement, others firmly against it, and yet others running the whole gamut of thoughts and feelings.
So much for the notion that being married is virtuous. Can't be an adulterer if you're single!
On the one hand, I think people underestimate how serious an accusation some guys consider adultery to be. This might this be a competitive disadvantage to married individuals; especially the ones who take their marital vows the most seriously; partaking in Twitch. People can point to Bill Clinton and Donald Trump getting away with it, but Tiger Woods got in much more trouble over it, so it's probably only out of blind partisanship that the former did.
That said, the risk of being put into dire poverty by child support bills has not restrained the male sex drive, so I can't blame anyone for assuming by default that marital fidelity wouldn't be adequate to do so either. For the same reason, I'd consider Riley J. Dennis' comparison to gay sex rumours a false equivalence. We know most people are straight. "X random individual is straight" is a perfectly reasonable default assumption. Adam Koebel complained about bisexuals being perceived as "fuck-crazed maniacs," as if the people characterizing them as that ever said there was anyone who WASN'T a fuck-crazed maniac.

by Ifreann » Fri Aug 17, 2018 4:19 am
Costa Fierro wrote:Stagnant Axon Terminal wrote:All this sounds like to me is "I don't know how to talk to women as people instead of objects of desire, so I'm just not going to speak to them at all."
Of course it would. He's also married too,having the ball and chain fittedtying the knot in August last year.
Nice use of shaming language, by the way. Making assumptions about him without actually knowing the facts. Ironic, really, as this is exactly what he is talking about and what he wants to avoid.

by Vassenor » Fri Aug 17, 2018 4:21 am
Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft wrote:LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:Last year, I brought you a thread about Mike Pence avoiding temptation for adultery. This thread is similar but distinct, as it is about a guy who doesn't claim he's particularly tempted to commit adultery... but that others will think he is.
https://www.polygon.com/2018/8/13/17684 ... e-valkyrae
So much for the notion that being married is virtuous. Can't be an adulterer if you're single!
On the one hand, I think people underestimate how serious an accusation some guys consider adultery to be. This might this be a competitive disadvantage to married individuals; especially the ones who take their marital vows the most seriously; partaking in Twitch. People can point to Bill Clinton and Donald Trump getting away with it, but Tiger Woods got in much more trouble over it, so it's probably only out of blind partisanship that the former did.
That said, the risk of being put into dire poverty by child support bills has not restrained the male sex drive, so I can't blame anyone for assuming by default that marital fidelity wouldn't be adequate to do so either. For the same reason, I'd consider Riley J. Dennis' comparison to gay sex rumours a false equivalence. We know most people are straight. "X random individual is straight" is a perfectly reasonable default assumption. Adam Koebel complained about bisexuals being perceived as "fuck-crazed maniacs," as if the people characterizing them as that ever said there was anyone who WASN'T a fuck-crazed maniac.
This is more of a symptom of a larger problem: the stereotype that all female gamers are "Twitch thots". If I were Ninja, I'd actually work to challenge this blatantly sexist stereotype rather than just avoid playing with female gamers and comply with the stereotype.

by Dumb Ideologies » Fri Aug 17, 2018 4:30 am

by Purpelia » Fri Aug 17, 2018 4:31 am

by Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft » Fri Aug 17, 2018 4:35 am
Vassenor wrote:Constitutional Technocracy of Minecraft wrote:This is more of a symptom of a larger problem: the stereotype that all female gamers are "Twitch thots". If I were Ninja, I'd actually work to challenge this blatantly sexist stereotype rather than just avoid playing with female gamers and comply with the stereotype.
Like that story about the streamer who got abuse from one of her channel mods because she turned him down for the very respectable reason of her being, you know, married?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Google Adsense [Bot], Kallorprith, Kostene, Nodin, Valrifell, Vonum, Yorsa II
Advertisement