&c. &c. &c.
Advertisement
by Christian Democrats » Sat Jun 30, 2018 2:40 pm
Leo Tolstoy wrote:Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
by Nueva Rico » Sat Jun 30, 2018 7:19 pm
Christian Democrats wrote:Declares that all member states and their subdivisions shall uphold an individual right to self-defense and shall permit and accept the exercise of this right as an affirmative defense in cases where an individual:
by Araraukar » Sun Jul 01, 2018 12:34 am
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Aclion » Sun Jul 01, 2018 12:43 pm
Araraukar wrote:OOC: I would still suggest that you put in a restriction about allowing the self defence clause only if getting help from law enforcement or other professional security personnell was impossible. Like, it's one thing if you'd need the help right now and it would take the police 15 minutes to get there, but calling them should still be your first priority.
a) The threat poses a clear and immediate danger to the life of the individual or his or her family,
by Araraukar » Mon Jul 02, 2018 6:06 am
Aclion wrote:a) The threat poses a clear and immediate danger to the life of the individual or his or her family,
If you have time to wait for police then how is the danger immediate?
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Kenmoria » Tue Jul 03, 2018 10:58 am
by Nueva Rico » Wed Jul 04, 2018 12:23 pm
Kenmoria wrote:"The definition of family is extremely vague and should be tightened. Furthermore, could you explain 3a as to what 'immediate' means. If, for example, a person entered the home of another, it is ambiguos whether the danger is immediate, since there is no instantaneous threat but an immediate likelihood the criminal is violent. Also, maybe the authoring delagation could add something about defence of property."
by Araraukar » Thu Jul 05, 2018 12:45 am
Nueva Rico wrote:1. How is an armed invader in your home not an immediate threat to your danger?
In that case, nothing is a threat until you are harmed.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Bananaaaaa » Thu Jul 05, 2018 5:35 am
by United Capitalist Federations » Thu Jul 05, 2018 5:41 am
by Bananaistan » Thu Jul 05, 2018 6:45 am
by The United Orthodox States » Thu Jul 05, 2018 2:34 pm
by Excidium Planetis » Thu Jul 05, 2018 9:51 pm
Singaporean Transhumans wrote:You didn't know about Excidium? The greatest space nomads in the NS multiverse with a healthy dose (read: over 9000 percent) of realism?
Saveyou Island wrote:"Warmest welcomes to the Assembly, ambassador. You'll soon learn to hate everyone here."
Imperium Anglorum wrote:Digital Network Defence is pretty meh
News: AI wins Dawn Fleet election for High Counselor.
by Araraukar » Mon Jul 09, 2018 1:49 pm
Bananaistan wrote:OOC: I think I'm missing something here.
Nueva Rico wrote:1. How is an armed invader in your home not an immediate threat to your danger?
United Capitalist Federations wrote:That makes no sense.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Kenmoria » Mon Jul 09, 2018 11:18 pm
by The United Orthodox States » Wed Jul 11, 2018 6:58 pm
Nueva Rico wrote:Hereby,
1. Defines “family” as someone related to an individual by blood, in marriage, in law, or of some substantial and tangible relationship,
by Kenmoria » Sat Jul 14, 2018 1:28 am
by Slavonia and Srijem » Mon Jul 16, 2018 5:19 pm
by Aclion » Tue Jul 17, 2018 9:05 am
Araraukar wrote:Bananaistan wrote:OOC: I think I'm missing something here.
OOC: Yes. This:Nueva Rico wrote:1. How is an armed invader in your home not an immediate threat to your danger?
If someone breaks into your house, you call the police. Even if you then ended up having to defend yourself, if you hear someone breaking into your house, you first call the police.
by Desmosthenes and Burke » Mon Oct 22, 2018 7:30 pm
by Araraukar » Sun Oct 28, 2018 1:57 am
Aclion wrote:But creating a gotcha clause to be abused by activist judges isn't the way to do it.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
by Kenmoria » Sun Oct 28, 2018 4:59 am
by New Waldensia » Sun Oct 28, 2018 5:04 pm
Araraukar wrote:If someone breaks into your house, you call the police. Even if you then ended up having to defend yourself, if you hear someone breaking into your house, you first call the police.
Army of Freedom medals received:
• N-Day² Medals -- N-Day³ Medals -- N-Day⁴ Medals
• Z-Day6 Medals
by Fardhin » Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:15 pm
Chairman : Farid Harun Samporna | Official Language : Malay | IC Year : 2069 | Anthem : Malaya will be Victorious!
A coalition of the nations of Malaya working hand in hand towards common goals and supporting each other. Founded to combat Natzarist faction in currently ongoing Malayan Civil War [PMT | OPEN].
NEWS:Coalition conducts ICBM and nuclear test, armed missile launched into Sahara with cooperation of Malayan ally, Cairene Arabia. | "Natzar is a fraud and the aristocratic party are traitors. If you are loyal to Malaya, it is much better to support the Coalition." says former Crown Prince Sayf Ar-Rijal Bolkiah.
by New Bremerton » Sun Oct 28, 2018 10:59 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement