by Blood Wine » Thu Jul 12, 2018 9:15 am
Xerographica wrote:Bombadil wrote:
No it wouldn't, it would indicate who has the most money to waste.
It's not a waste to help fund our community, just like it's not a waste to help fund our government.
Also...
Justice For The Parkus Empire!
by USS Monitor » Thu Jul 12, 2018 9:30 am
by Xerographica » Thu Jul 12, 2018 11:55 am
USS Monitor wrote:Warned Xero and yelled at the thread generally to discourage others from posting more responses.
USS Monitor wrote:Parkus is not the subject of this thread. The continued use of this thread as a platform to litigate his deletion will result in the thread being locked and further punishments being handed out to whoever continues the threadjack.
Forsher wrote:You, I and everyone we know, knows Xero's threads are about one thing and one thing only.
by USS Monitor » Thu Jul 12, 2018 12:21 pm
Xerographica wrote:USS Monitor wrote:Warned Xero and yelled at the thread generally to discourage others from posting more responses.
Thanks for warning me instead of simply locking the thread. You wrote...USS Monitor wrote:Parkus is not the subject of this thread. The continued use of this thread as a platform to litigate his deletion will result in the thread being locked and further punishments being handed out to whoever continues the threadjack.
This seems to imply that the problem isn't that we were litigating his deletion, it was that we were doing so in the wrong place. Is my interpretation incorrect? As far as I know, it isn't against the rules to discuss/debate a member's deletion. Admittedly it's been a while since I've read the rules.
If it isn't illegal to discuss/debate the deletion of Parkus, where would be the most appropriate place to do so?
Users browsing this forum: Sirian