by Moderated Macroeconomis » Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:39 am
by Vassenor » Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:39 am
by Moderated Macroeconomis » Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:41 am
Vassenor wrote:The islanders have made their stance very clear. In a rational world that would be the end of it.
by Allyrije » Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:42 am
by Mystic Warriors » Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:43 am
by Clavonian Empire » Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:44 am
by Moderated Macroeconomis » Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:44 am
Allyrije wrote:No. We bled for the islands and will bleed for them again. The islanders recognised the sacrifices we've made for them and have voted time and time again to remain with us. To deny them this is not only undemocratic but tyrannical, taking a people from a nation where their culture is in the majority and putting them into a nation where not only would they be a tiny minority but a despised on.
by Mystic Warriors » Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:45 am
Clavonian Empire wrote:The sun will never set on the British Empire, which includes the Falklands as far as I’m concerned.
by Ifreann » Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:45 am
by Allyrije » Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:46 am
Moderated Macroeconomis wrote:well world war three could happen if we dont have UN peacekeepers protecting the island
by Christmas Pudding » Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:47 am
by Fartsniffage » Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:47 am
by Ifreann » Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:47 am
by Durzan » Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:48 am
by Moderated Macroeconomis » Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:48 am
Allyrije wrote:Moderated Macroeconomis wrote:well world war three could happen if we dont have UN peacekeepers protecting the island
UN Peacekeepers have proven themselves time and time again to be about as useful as a chocolate frying pan and about as competent as a midwife with two hooks for hands. Placing them on British territory would make about as much sense as putting Harvey Weinstein in charge of a Nursery
by Moderated Macroeconomis » Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:49 am
Durzan wrote:Make them independent, but have them join the British Commonwealth.
Then have them form a treaty with Argentina allowing them to establish a small military base on one of the islands (for a fee of course). Also allow the British Navy to do the same.
Both parties win, and the islanders technically self-governing yet still part of the British Empire for all intents and purposes.
by Kul Ibla » Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:50 am
by Agarntrop » Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:53 am
by Moderated Macroeconomis » Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:55 am
Agarntrop wrote:The only problem with Falklands independence is the fact less than 3,000 people live there, they couldn't sustain a nation with such a small and widely spread population.
by The New California Republic » Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:55 am
by Agarntrop » Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:56 am
Moderated Macroeconomis wrote:Agarntrop wrote:The only problem with Falklands independence is the fact less than 3,000 people live there, they couldn't sustain a nation with such a small and widely spread population.
lichtenstein and monaco are smaller but are richest countries every
falklands has oil, so it would be the richest in the planet with GDP per capita
by Evil Lord Bane » Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:57 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Jetan, Singaporen Empire
Advertisement