Advertisement
by Marilyn Manson Freaks » Fri Apr 20, 2018 6:43 am
by Wrapper » Fri Apr 20, 2018 6:46 am
by Routcher » Fri Apr 20, 2018 10:05 am
by Greater Gilead » Fri Apr 20, 2018 10:48 am
Routcher wrote:Update- I've got a lot on my plate in real life and I'm not gonna be able to keep up with NS enough to put in a proper effort towards this. If someone else wants to pick this up, you have my blessing. Sorry for any disappointment.
Deropia wrote:Jason can't help but laugh as the scotch bottle, followed soon after by the pie, fly through the air of the chamber. "Ah, this place may be a mad-house...but its the best damn posting I've ever had...".
The Bible Baptist Republic wrote:Ambassador Conklin reads the proposal, blinks twice, and mutters "There ain't enough whiskey to deal with this crap."
by Lord Dominator » Fri Apr 20, 2018 3:13 pm
Greater Gilead wrote:Routcher wrote:Update- I've got a lot on my plate in real life and I'm not gonna be able to keep up with NS enough to put in a proper effort towards this. If someone else wants to pick this up, you have my blessing. Sorry for any disappointment.
I'd pick it up, but I'm worried my name on it could negatively affect it.
by Fahran » Mon Apr 23, 2018 4:57 am
Lord Dominator wrote:Not anymore than unwillingness to Condemn Navasse already does
by Kaboomlandia » Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:26 am
by Arkhall » Mon Apr 23, 2018 8:57 am
Last Plains wrote:I've been given limitless power and I'm in a bad mood.
The New California Republic wrote:Nietzsche is just laughable, it reads like tabloid trash.
by Fahran » Mon Apr 23, 2018 9:07 am
Arkhall wrote:
It's almost like he knows he's defamed his own name with these absolute jokes of proposals, and is pretending to step away so that he can bring a puppet nation and author the proposals again anyways.
by Benevolent Thomas » Thu Apr 26, 2018 11:24 am
Ballotonia wrote:Personally, I think there's something seriously wrong with a game if it willfully allows the destruction of longtime player communities in favor of kids whose sole purpose is to enjoy ruining the game for others.
by Big Bad Badger » Thu Apr 26, 2018 12:47 pm
Benevolent Thomas wrote:He deserves to be forgotten. AGAINST.
by Cute Puppies » Thu Apr 26, 2018 1:11 pm
Benevolent Thomas wrote:He deserves to be forgotten. AGAINST.
by Kurnugia » Thu Apr 26, 2018 2:09 pm
Arkhall wrote:
It's almost like he knows he's defamed his own name with these absolute jokes of proposals, and is pretending to step away so that he can bring a puppet nation and author the proposals again anyways.
by Indo-Malaysia » Thu Apr 26, 2018 2:19 pm
by Fauxia » Thu Apr 26, 2018 4:36 pm
by Fahran » Fri Apr 27, 2018 5:55 am
by Naginii » Fri Apr 27, 2018 10:50 am
Routcher wrote:...Concerned by the precedent these aggressive liberation resolutions against natives have set, which create a culture within the Security Council more focused on war than on global peace, and ultimately leads to increased destabilization around the world...
by Prydania » Fri Apr 27, 2018 9:48 pm
Naginii wrote:Routcher wrote:...Concerned by the precedent these aggressive liberation resolutions against natives have set, which create a culture within the Security Council more focused on war than on global peace, and ultimately leads to increased destabilization around the world...
Interesting. I seem to recall a debate wherein I was repeatedly, and rather ludicrously, scolded that there was no "slippery slope" in weaponizing the Liberation, that there was no risk in causing disruption to the wider gamemap, and that of course it wouldn't be used widely against non-fascist regions or anyone else that might cross this group — "because it was only intended ever to be used against Nazis."
LOL. QED.
by Kaboomlandia » Fri Apr 27, 2018 10:00 pm
Prydania wrote:Naginii wrote:
Interesting. I seem to recall a debate wherein I was repeatedly, and rather ludicrously, scolded that there was no "slippery slope" in weaponizing the Liberation, that there was no risk in causing disruption to the wider gamemap, and that of course it wouldn't be used widely against non-fascist regions or anyone else that might cross this group — "because it was only intended ever to be used against Nazis."
LOL. QED.
Who else have "weaponized liberations" been used against?
I count KREICH and Nazi Europa. Am I missing something?
by Prydania » Fri Apr 27, 2018 10:05 pm
by Indo-Malaysia » Sat Apr 28, 2018 1:58 am
Prydania wrote:Kaboomlandia wrote:Femdom. Then we repealed it because it blew up in our face. And that’s not counting the unsuccessful attempts against other regions.
Femdom was rife with Nazi influences so *shrug*
And those unsuccessful attempts to apply offensive liberations to non-Nazi/fascist regions proves my point. The community as a whole rejected them because it remains committed to only using this new weapon against Nazis and fascists.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: IdontCare
Advertisement