Possible war with Syria?

[Dogmeat]

The Bosna of Zarahosh condemns American aggression and its adamant demand for war in Syria. While the use of chemical weapons may be a debatable reason to attack/invade another country, the pointing of fingers at (and subsequently attacking) one particular faction among many involved in a civil war, without any credible evidence no less, is a blatant attempt to have an excuse to further imperialize the world. At this point in time, the government of Zarahosh believes it more likely that the United States has used chemical weapons against Syrian citizens in an attempt to justify further military aggression against the Assad regime. Zarahosh stands against the bloodthirsty American Empire, and believes that military action against US forts and cities is justified by the US's own logic

Thank you for your contribution. This entire forum is strictly OOC.

This would have been better if the ironclad had posted it.

[The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp]

The Bosna of Zarahosh condemns American aggression and its adamant demand for war in Syria. While the use of chemical weapons may be a debatable reason to attack/invade another country, the pointing of fingers at (and subsequently attacking) one particular faction among many involved in a civil war, without any credible evidence no less, is a blatant attempt to have an excuse to further imperialize the world. At this point in time, the government of Zarahosh believes it more likely that the United States has used chemical weapons against Syrian citizens in an attempt to justify further military aggression against the Assad regime. Zarahosh stands against the bloodthirsty American Empire, and believes that military action against US forts and cities is justified by the US's own logic

You want II m8

This is NSG, this is IRL.

[Zarahosh]

The Bosna of Zarahosh condemns American aggression and its adamant demand for war in Syria. While the use of chemical weapons may be a debatable reason to attack/invade another country, the pointing of fingers at (and subsequently attacking) one particular faction among many involved in a civil war, without any credible evidence no less, is a blatant attempt to have an excuse to further imperialize the world. At this point in time, the government of Zarahosh believes it more likely that the United States has used chemical weapons against Syrian citizens in an attempt to justify further military aggression against the Assad regime. Zarahosh stands against the bloodthirsty American Empire, and believes that military action against US forts and cities is justified by the US's own logic

Thank you for your contribution. This entire forum is strictly OOC.

Yes, I see. My mistake...
I condemn American aggression and our government's adamant demand for war more involvement in Syria. While the use of chemical weapons may be a debatable reason to attack/invade another country, the pointing of fingers at (and subsequently attacking) one particular faction among many involved in a civil war, without any credible evidence no less, is a blatant attempt to have an excuse to further imperialize the world. In fact, I find it much more logical that the United States or a US-backed rebel faction used chemical weapons against Syrian citizens in an attempt to justify further military aggression against the Assad regime. The response then, following the US's own logic, should be the bombing of American military bases and cities. US foreign policy in the Middle East has been and remains pure insanity

[Myfanwyski]

Worrying times, the uncertainty of a situation like this makes me feel nostalgic for ‘the Great Communicator’. If only Reagan could tweet from the grave, I wonder what he would say.

The world’s focus is on the main players in this ‘game’ but there is a loose cannon in the form of the Isises of this world.

[Purpelia]

That's because as bad as they are ISIS and their ilk still do not have the capacity to end industrial civilization in an afternoon.

[Nulla Bellum]

Worrying times, the uncertainty of a situation like this makes me feel nostalgic for ‘the Great Communicator’. If only Reagan could tweet from the grave, I wonder what he would say.

The world’s focus is on the main players in this ‘game’ but there is a loose cannon in the form of the Isises of this world.

I think Reagan would have floated two resolutions at the UN. One condemning the Syrian use of chemical weapons upon its own people, and another praising Syria for gassing its own people, and then challenge Russia to say how they're voting.

[Soviet Lestland]

What about the Jews? What's their role in this?

They’re in the shadows, counting their pennies and stroking their big noses I guess.
Y’know, evil Jew stuff.

"GOYIM KNOWS; SHUT IT DOWN"
How every 4channer sees jewish people

[Durin VII]

It actually does, as conventional warfare between superpowers will, in any way, escalate into nuclear warfare.



Still words, but no action yet.



And so what that Assad killed US soldiers? Are you seriously claiming that it is illegal for a country to defend itself against foreign agression?

Tell me. Let's say Mexico would bomb the shit out of the US, funded extremist organisations within the US and sended over troops to safeguard their interests all without US or UN approval. Now let's imagine the US would strike back and killed a couple of Mexican soldiers. Then Mexico would start firing missiles into the US. Do you really believe that last action would be legal in any way, shape or form?

I do not hide my disagreements with the US, just like you don't hide the fact that you would crawl into its ass if it had one.

Why the fuck are you even defending that genocidal megalomaniac puppet that lives in Putin’s pocket? You must surely hate America; after all, they rarely (never) tolerate chemical attacks on ones own civilian populace.

Why the fuck do you defend a bunch of warcriminals who aspire world domination?
And no, i do not hate America. I just have many disagreements with what they're doing.

Oh, and you're such a joke claiming that the US never tolerates chemical attacks on ones own civilians. The US even supported a country who did just that, or have you already forgotten about Iraq? On top of that, the US maintained its own chemical weapons program for the vast majority of the 20th century and even today it still has chemical weapons stored.

[Albrenia]

Why the fuck are you even defending that genocidal megalomaniac puppet that lives in Putin’s pocket? You must surely hate America; after all, they rarely (never) tolerate chemical attacks on ones own civilian populace.

Why the fuck do you defend a bunch of warcriminals who aspire world domination?
And no, i do not hate America. I just have many disagreements with what they're doing.

Oh, and you're such a joke claiming that the US never tolerates chemical attacks on ones own civilians. The US even supported a country who did just that, or have you already forgotten about Iraq? On top of that, the US maintained its own chemical weapons program for the vast majority of the 20th century and even today it still has chemical weapons stored.

Wait, which warcriminals, are we talking about the spooky globalists again or is this actual people this time?

[Costa Fierro]

Remember everyone, it's not just America.

[Sovaal]

Thank you for your contribution. This entire forum is strictly OOC.

Yes, I see. My mistake...
I condemn American aggression and our government's adamant demand for war more involvement in Syria. While the use of chemical weapons may be a debatable reason to attack/invade another country, the pointing of fingers at (and subsequently attacking) one particular faction among many involved in a civil war, without any credible evidence no less, is a blatant attempt to have an excuse to further imperialize the world. In fact, I find it much more logical that the United States or a US-backed rebel faction used chemical weapons against Syrian citizens in an attempt to justify further military aggression against the Assad regime. The response then, following the US's own logic, should be the bombing of American military bases and cities. US foreign policy in the Middle East has been and remains pure insanity

The entire ME is fucking insane. Honestly we should just least the entire region burn.

[Sovaal]

Remember everyone, it's not just America.

I mean that doesn’t really change most of those guys arguments.

[NeuPolska]

Yes, I see. My mistake...
I condemn American aggression and our government's adamant demand for war more involvement in Syria. While the use of chemical weapons may be a debatable reason to attack/invade another country, the pointing of fingers at (and subsequently attacking) one particular faction among many involved in a civil war, without any credible evidence no less, is a blatant attempt to have an excuse to further imperialize the world. In fact, I find it much more logical that the United States or a US-backed rebel faction used chemical weapons against Syrian citizens in an attempt to justify further military aggression against the Assad regime. The response then, following the US's own logic, should be the bombing of American military bases and cities. US foreign policy in the Middle East has been and remains pure insanity

The entire ME is fucking insane. Honestly we should just least the entire region burn.

If you let a fire burn, it might spread

[Sovaal]

The entire ME is fucking insane. Honestly we should just least the entire region burn.

If you let a fire burn, it might spread

Fire’s already spreading. It’s been spreading for decades, and all anyone does in the region is just make it worse.
Imho the best thing to do is to stay out.

[Unstoppable Empire of Doom]

The thing is if Russia manages to knock a bunch of missiles out of the air then the US will lose prestige and Russia will finally reaffirm their military as a competitive detterent to the US in certain regions. If they fail to then they lose prestige and a bunch of people die. Countries will not take US threats of force as serious and it could cause another israeli-arab war.

[Durin VII]

Why the fuck do you defend a bunch of warcriminals who aspire world domination?
And no, i do not hate America. I just have many disagreements with what they're doing.

Oh, and you're such a joke claiming that the US never tolerates chemical attacks on ones own civilians. The US even supported a country who did just that, or have you already forgotten about Iraq? On top of that, the US maintained its own chemical weapons program for the vast majority of the 20th century and even today it still has chemical weapons stored.

Wait, which warcriminals, are we talking about the spooky globalists again or is this actual people this time?

I don't know, is the US government made up of 'spooky globalists', or actual people?

Remember everyone, it's not just America.

Ofcourse he has. He had proof about it last time as well, turned out to be a whole lot of 'mabye', 'perhaps', 'likely' etc.
Basically he had nothing then, just like he has nothing now.

[Albrenia]

Wait, which warcriminals, are we talking about the spooky globalists again or is this actual people this time?

I don't know, is the US government made up of 'spooky globalists', or actual people?

Remember everyone, it's not just America.

Ofcourse he has. He had proof about it last time as well, turned out to be a whole lot of 'mabye', 'perhaps', 'likely' etc.
Basically he had nothing then, just like he has nothing now.

Trump's never been to war, how can he be a war criminal?

[Democratic Communist Federation]

Ehm... The capitalist system is doing just fine?

Not for long.

[Democratic Communist Federation]

I would venture to say that capitalism has been growing quite swellingly across the globe, as opposed to retracting.

Mexico City has also been growing excessively for several years, and it is not in particularly good shape. Growth is not necessarily a sign of health.

[Democratic Communist Federation]

You're talking to a communist. That's where the two intersect.

Not only a communist, a Luxemburgist, libertarian, far-left communist. I see the situation in Syria from a much different angle than most people (considering that libertarian communists represent an infinitesimal fraction of an infinitesimal fraction of a percentage of the global population).

[Washington Resistance Army]

Ehm... The capitalist system is doing just fine?

Not for long.

Said all the communists in 1917

[Trumptonium1]

Not for long.

Said all the communists in 1917

They yelled it in Faubourg du Temple in 1871 too.

[New Axiom]

Why the fuck are you even defending that genocidal megalomaniac puppet that lives in Putin’s pocket? You must surely hate America; after all, they rarely (never) tolerate chemical attacks on ones own civilian populace.

Why the fuck do you defend a bunch of warcriminals who aspire world domination?
And no, i do not hate America. I just have many disagreements with what they're doing.

Oh, and you're such a joke claiming that the US never tolerates chemical attacks on ones own civilians. The US even supported a country who did just that, or have you already forgotten about Iraq? On top of that, the US maintained its own chemical weapons program for the vast majority of the 20th century and even today it still has chemical weapons stored.

The current POTUS not most of his administration are not war criminals. Far from it; mister Trump probably knows next to nothing about actually fighting a war. Plus, if America really, really wanted this world domination they could easily take over the world. Biggest military budget, most aircraft carriers, nukes, etc.

America tolerates Iraqi usage of chemical weapons? I see. You seem to have forgotten Iraqi chemical attacks on Isreal in ‘91. Oh, and WMDs-chemical weapons included-was the whole reason for the ‘03 invasion. Or did you forget history?

The United States maintains far more than a dinky chemical weapons stockpile. They also maintain a large nuclear arsenal capable of destroying the world a few times over. But when was the last time you read about American missiles dropping VX gas on a civilian neighborhood?

Edit; yes I know the regime didn’t use VX in their supposed attack.

[New Axiom]

But they wouldn’t need to keep the war going for that. I mean, they have no reason to end it, but yeah.

You don't know. In a few years they weasel their way into Turkey, ostensibly to protect Erdogan from evil terrorists. Then, in a dramatic coup de main they seize the Bosphorus. The Russian flag flies over the Topkapi Palace, Orthodox hymns are heard again in Hagia Sophia, the Russian Navy pours into the Eastern Mediterranean while hordes of previously frozen mammoth cavalry crosses the Bering Straits to seize Sarah Palin and carry her off to slavery in the Czar's ... uhm ...

Okay, maybe not but it's a great way to meddle in the Middle (East). The Soviets always tried to do that. Putin is nothing if not a good son of the revolution.

I would actually defect to the Russians simply for that mammoth cavalry. The thought of that is amazing... you could make a gigantic saddle and attach MLRS launchers on the sides, armor plate it’s tusks and strap tank cannons to them, somehow implant a nuclear reactor into the mammoth that by some fear of biology manages to power the creature... oh it’s glorious

[Major-Tom]

Remember everyone, it's not just America.

Macron, Tony Blair II Electric Boogaloo?