The Christian Discussion thread IX: Pelagius Rising.

[Tarsonis]

Technically if you’re a baptized and confirmed Catholic you need a dispensation from a bishop to routinely attend Protestant worship

Why would dispensation ever be given for that?

I dunno if it would, but they would need it

[Albrenia]

Why would dispensation ever be given for that?

I dunno if it would, but they would need it

Only reason I could think of is if they lived in an isolated area and the only reasonably accessable church nearby was Protestant, maybe.

[Salus Maior]

I know he created billions of planets when I say he only created one world I mean he has only created one world with mortal life on it. Unless you count Heaven then he created two worlds.



Ah okay thanks for correcting me

It was my pleasure.
I have the responsibility to add that the story of Job is a play. It is not fact. Just because it is in the Bible does not make it unalterable truth.

Why would you want to alter it? That wouldn't be a service to anyone.

As a book of the Bible, the book of Job is considered "Divinely Inspired", and therefore important to the pursuit of Divine Truth. One would want to have a full understanding of the book and what it means (whether it's a literal story or a parable) as part of that pursuit, altering it would be destructive and pointless.

[The Glorious Third Reign of Templedom]

When did I ever call myself an anti-christ?

Quoted from here.

[Tarsonis]

When did I ever call myself an anti-christ?

Quoted from here.

That’s not me saying I’m anti-christ, that you not understanding the point.

Did Jesus sin?

[The Glorious Third Reign of Templedom]

....Tars isn't socially engineering anything, nor is Arch.(1)

And he's right in saying not to engage the edgelord atheist. The whole point of his display is to trigger Christians, attacking him on it is what he wants.(2)

(1) Or so you say.

(2)... and refute we must. There's a bible quote about rebuking errors and a secular quote about how evil grows when good men do nothing etc etc so whichever the case...

(3) wait, are you Christian? Should I be engaging you in dialectic, considering your advice and your flag? Irony.

[The Glorious Third Reign of Templedom]

That’s not me saying I’m anti-christ, that you not understanding the point. (1)

Did Jesus sin?(2)

(1) No, I understand very well. You slipped big time and now to continue justifying your presense in CDT you are hoping to catch me on doctrinal deficiencies. No baptized Christian guided by the Holy Spirit will make the blasphemous statement you did.

(2) Jesus Christ was born without sin but He took the sins of the entire world upon Himself to atone for us.

Everything you need to know about the Messiah.

[Tarsonis]

That’s not me saying I’m anti-christ, that you not understanding the point. (1)

Did Jesus sin?(2)

(1) No, I understand very well. You slipped big time and now to continue justifying your presense in CDT you are hoping to catch me on doctrinal deficiencies. No baptized Christian guided by the Holy Spirit will make the blasphemous statement you did.

(2) Jesus Christ was born without sin but He took the sins of the entire world upon Himself to atone for us.

Everything you need to know about the Messiah.

1. I’ve been in the CDT longer than you’ve been on NS. I’m OP of the thread genius.
2. I don’t know what you meant by slipped. It’s not blasphemous if it’s not genuine, especially since everyone here was capable of understanding what I said....except you.

3. But that’s not what the Verse you quoted said. It said all have sinned. Either A. Christ committed sin, or B. That verse isn’t absolute.



You really need to knock off your postering and engage in actual discussion

[Bakery Hill]

what's your point?

Go figure. (Or ask your priest, if you know one.)

No different from you parading around an openly acknowledged christian symbol as you flag etc etc etc.

Considering your flag is really a devils trap, you’re doing us a service.

A satanist and an antichrist (both self-professed) have joined arms, who'd have thunk? Do both of you, like Archregimancy, also work in oil & gas the middle east (edited) by any chance? Just curious.

"I will therefore put you in remembrance, though ye once knew this, how that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that believed not."
(Jude 1:5, KJV)
Epistle of Jude

"It's not responsibility to educate you"

mate are you a christian sjw?

[Tarsonis]

Go figure. (Or ask your priest, if you know one.)





A satanist and an antichrist (both self-professed) have joined arms, who'd have thunk? Do both of you, like Archregimancy, also work in oil & gas the middle east (edited) by any chance? Just curious.

"I will therefore put you in remembrance, though ye once knew this, how that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that believed not."
(Jude 1:5, KJV)
Epistle of Jude

"It's not responsibility to educate you"

mate are you a christian sjw?

Worse. I go to Yale with christian SJW’s. They’re actually engable.

[Bakery Hill]

"It's not responsibility to educate you"

mate are you a christian sjw?

Worse. I go to Yale with christian SJW’s. They’re actually engable.

I meant in methods rather than values. Though that is interesting.

[The Blaatschapen]

So, what interest do you have in the Christian Discussion Thread?

I believe they popped by to applaud a particularly funny bit of Blasphemy by Blaat, and then were drawn into a conversation about blasphemy and mocking God.

EDIT - Ninja'd by the man himself.

Ahem.

The correct term here is Blaatsphemy.

[The Glorious Third Reign of Templedom]

"It's not responsibility to educate you"

mate are you a christian sjw?

It really isn't. I am not trained in catechism, so I only share what I know, that I am confident of, with those who seem genuinely interested.

[ ... ]
You really need to knock off your postering and engage in actual discussion

Yes you are very invested in this social engineering account of yours. Lol, go read a book. (If you've read it already, read it again - it's a big book.)

Edit: social engineering defense: edited in 2nd link

[Albrenia]

I believe they popped by to applaud a particularly funny bit of Blasphemy by Blaat, and then were drawn into a conversation about blasphemy and mocking God.

EDIT - Ninja'd by the man himself.

Ahem.

The correct term here is Blaatsphemy.

Damnit, you made me laugh -again-. Stop making me laugh out loud when I'm sitting in a room alone.

On the topic at hand, what do you mean Temple when you say 'social engineering'? Usually I hear that term to apply more to organisations than individuals.

[Tarsonis]

"It's not responsibility to educate you"

mate are you a christian sjw?

It really isn't. I am not trained in catechism, so I only share what I know, that I am confident of, with those who seem genuinely interested.

[ ... ]
You really need to knock off your postering and engage in actual discussion

Yes you are very invested in this social engineering account of yours. Lol, go read a book. (If you've read it already, read it again - it's a big book.)

Edit: social engineering defense: edited in 2nd link

What on earth are you even talking about?

[The Glorious Third Reign of Templedom]

... On the topic at hand, what do you mean Temple[dom] when you say 'social engineering'? Usually I hear that term to apply more to organisations than individuals.

It is the insidious nature of such tactics to always carry the shield of plausible deniability. Same with micro-aggression tactics commonplace online AND offline. So I won't delve into details. Suffice to say that once you've known one you've known them all.

"If any man have ears to hear, let him hear." (Mark 4:23, KJV)

[Tarsonis]

... On the topic at hand, what do you mean Temple[dom] when you say 'social engineering'? Usually I hear that term to apply more to organisations than individuals.

It is the insidious nature of such tactics to always carry the shield of plausible deniability. Same with micro-aggression tactics commonplace online AND offline. So I won't delve into details. Suffice to say that once you've known one you've known them all.

"If any man have ears to hear, let him hear." (Mark 4:23, KJV)

So in otherwords is something you made up to avoid responding to challenges and criticisms.

[Albrenia]

... On the topic at hand, what do you mean Temple[dom] when you say 'social engineering'? Usually I hear that term to apply more to organisations than individuals.

It is the insidious nature of such tactics to always carry the shield of plausible deniability. Same with micro-aggression tactics commonplace online AND offline. So I won't delve into details. Suffice to say that once you've known one you've known them all.

"If any man have ears to hear, let him hear." (Mark 4:23, KJV)

Ah, ok. Thanks.

[The Glorious Third Reign of Templedom]

Psst... another favourite tactic of these "social engineers" is making the pages fly
-> -> ->

[Old Tyrannia]

A satanist and an antichrist (both self-professed) have joined arms, who'd have thunk? Do both of you, like Archregimancy, also work in oil & gas the middle east (edited) by any chance? Just curious.

I initially thought I would let this go as a provocative but valid theological viewpoint, but given your insistence that Tarsonis is a "self-professed antichrist" when they have clearly admitted to no such thing, and the baity nature of the rest of the comment, The Glorious Third Reign of Templedom: *** warned for flamebait. ***

[The Glorious Third Reign of Templedom]

A satanist and an antichrist (both self-professed) have joined arms, who'd have thunk? Do both of you, like Archregimancy, also work in oil & gas the middle east (edited) by any chance? Just curious.

I initially thought I would let this go as a provocative but valid theological viewpoint, but given your insistence that Tarsonis is a "self-professed antichrist" when they have clearly admitted to no such thing, and the baity nature of the rest of the comment, The Glorious Third Reign of Templedom: *** warned for flamebait. ***

Badge of honour. For how long does this warning remain valid?

Edit: just dawned on me what a flimsy reason that was.

Truther: are you a liar?
Liar: of course not

Wow!

[Bakery Hill]

"It's not responsibility to educate you"

mate are you a christian sjw?

It really isn't. I am not trained in catechism, so I only share what I know, that I am confident of, with those who seem genuinely interested.

[ ... ]
You really need to knock off your postering and engage in actual discussion

Yes you are very invested in this social engineering account of yours. Lol, go read a book. (If you've read it already, read it again - it's a big book.)

Edit: social engineering defense: edited in 2nd link

So you're either being ignorant or acting conceited here. Fair enough.

[Bakery Hill]

I mean how do you expect someone to engage with your religion if this is how you behave? Thankfully there are more Christlike Christians in this thread.

[Benuty]

I mean how do you expect someone to engage with your religion if this is how you behave? Thankfully there are more Christlike Christians in this thread.

I would like to think this is bait to blowback all of those except those who would listen for the hell of it only to fall into a trap.

[Tarsonis]

I mean how do you expect someone to engage with your religion if this is how you behave? Thankfully there are more Christlike Christians in this thread.

I would like to think this is bait to blowback all of those except those who would listen for the hell of it only to fall into a trap.