United Citizens of North America wrote:The Dems aren't even authoritarian.

Advertisement

by Washington Resistance Army » Thu Mar 29, 2018 8:58 pm

by Telconi » Thu Mar 29, 2018 8:58 pm
United Citizens of North America wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Hint: We have horrid authoritarians running both parties, that's reason enough for the citizenry to be armed equivalent to anything an infantryman might have.
Trump is too dumb to be a king. And who would follow Pelosi/Schumer into battle. The Dems aren't even authoritarian. All of that is not realistic at all. I'm talking invasions, people.

by Mujahidah » Thu Mar 29, 2018 8:58 pm
Telconi wrote:Mujahidah wrote:
That's a good measure. Basically the crux of what I want, tbh.
Ok. Would being convicted of a violent felony count? Domestic battery?
What would you mean by this?
In the case of it being tied to a criminal conviction, would appealing the conviction itself be a reasonable avenue?
Felonies and battery would count, basically IMO any violent offense would be disqualifying.
Social programs, the vast majority of gun crime is in fact gang crime or street crime, despite the attention paid mass shootings, they are a minority. Nonetheless, you could address both sorts via social programs designed to intervene and assist individuals who are headed down the path towards criminal activity.
Yeah, a vacated criminal conviction should restore any rights lost as a result.
The Parkus Empire wrote:To paraphrase my hero, Richard Nixon: she's pink right down to her hijab.
The Parkus Empire wrote:I misjudged you, you are much more smarter than I gave you credit for.
Northern Davincia wrote:Can we engrave this in a plaque?
The Parkus Empire wrote:I am not sure I'm entirely comfortable with a woman being this well informed, but I'll try not to judge.
The Parkus Empire wrote:Ah, m'lady, if I were a heathen I'd wed thee four times

by Valgora » Thu Mar 29, 2018 8:59 pm
United Citizens of North America wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Hint: We have horrid authoritarians running both parties, that's reason enough for the citizenry to be armed equivalent to anything an infantryman might have.
Trump is too dumb to be a king. And who would follow Pelosi/Schumer into battle. The Dems aren't even authoritarian. All of that is not realistic at all. I'm talking invasions, people.
MT+FanT+some PMT
Multi-species.
Current gov't:
Founded 2023
Currently 2027

by Telconi » Thu Mar 29, 2018 8:59 pm

by Telconi » Thu Mar 29, 2018 8:59 pm
Mujahidah wrote:Telconi wrote:
Felonies and battery would count, basically IMO any violent offense would be disqualifying.
Social programs, the vast majority of gun crime is in fact gang crime or street crime, despite the attention paid mass shootings, they are a minority. Nonetheless, you could address both sorts via social programs designed to intervene and assist individuals who are headed down the path towards criminal activity.
Yeah, a vacated criminal conviction should restore any rights lost as a result.
Honestly not finding much to disagree with you on here.
One question, though. Would some kind of mandated minimum safety course be appropriate, to you? Assuming that there were financial aid provided to people who couldn't afford it/it was just paid for regardless?

by United Citizens of North America » Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:00 pm

by United Citizens of North America » Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:02 pm
Telconi wrote:United Citizens of North America wrote:
Trump is too dumb to be a king. And who would follow Pelosi/Schumer into battle. The Dems aren't even authoritarian. All of that is not realistic at all. I'm talking invasions, people.
Artificially limiting the arguments makes no sense.
"I don't need insurance because the likelihood of a plane crashing on my car is astronomically low and I'm only going to measure plane crash related auto damage when considering my risks."
There are so many possible threats to my security that range from foreign countries to Joe the crack addict.

by Mujahidah » Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:04 pm
Telconi wrote:Mujahidah wrote:
Honestly not finding much to disagree with you on here.
One question, though. Would some kind of mandated minimum safety course be appropriate, to you? Assuming that there were financial aid provided to people who couldn't afford it/it was just paid for regardless?
If it wasn't overly burdensome and was free of charge, sure.
The Parkus Empire wrote:To paraphrase my hero, Richard Nixon: she's pink right down to her hijab.
The Parkus Empire wrote:I misjudged you, you are much more smarter than I gave you credit for.
Northern Davincia wrote:Can we engrave this in a plaque?
The Parkus Empire wrote:I am not sure I'm entirely comfortable with a woman being this well informed, but I'll try not to judge.
The Parkus Empire wrote:Ah, m'lady, if I were a heathen I'd wed thee four times

by United Citizens of North America » Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:04 pm

by Mujahidah » Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:05 pm
The Parkus Empire wrote:To paraphrase my hero, Richard Nixon: she's pink right down to her hijab.
The Parkus Empire wrote:I misjudged you, you are much more smarter than I gave you credit for.
Northern Davincia wrote:Can we engrave this in a plaque?
The Parkus Empire wrote:I am not sure I'm entirely comfortable with a woman being this well informed, but I'll try not to judge.
The Parkus Empire wrote:Ah, m'lady, if I were a heathen I'd wed thee four times

by Valgora » Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:06 pm
MT+FanT+some PMT
Multi-species.
Current gov't:
Founded 2023
Currently 2027

by Washington Resistance Army » Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:07 pm

by United Citizens of North America » Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:07 pm
His policies aren't far from the GOP, as far as I've seen. But prove me wrong.

by Mujahidah » Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:08 pm
The Parkus Empire wrote:To paraphrase my hero, Richard Nixon: she's pink right down to her hijab.
The Parkus Empire wrote:I misjudged you, you are much more smarter than I gave you credit for.
Northern Davincia wrote:Can we engrave this in a plaque?
The Parkus Empire wrote:I am not sure I'm entirely comfortable with a woman being this well informed, but I'll try not to judge.
The Parkus Empire wrote:Ah, m'lady, if I were a heathen I'd wed thee four times

by United Citizens of North America » Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:09 pm
Valgora wrote:United Citizens of North America wrote:
What integral human rights? Like the GOP not supporting the ability for every taxpayer to live a long and healthy life?
The right to bear arms.
Both parties are authoritarian.
If you fail to see that the Democratic party is authoritarian, then you are too partisan to a fault. It would be comparable to me not realizing that Stalin was authoritarian (no, I'm not saying the Democratic party similar to Stalin).

by The Two Jerseys » Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:10 pm


by Washington Resistance Army » Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:10 pm
United Citizens of North America wrote:Valgora wrote:
The right to bear arms.
Both parties are authoritarian.
If you fail to see that the Democratic party is authoritarian, then you are too partisan to a fault. It would be comparable to me not realizing that Stalin was authoritarian (no, I'm not saying the Democratic party similar to Stalin).
I can see where that "authoritarian streak" comes from (corporocratic Dems, Obama's drone spying), but Democrats weren't the party passing the Patriot Act. We haven't supported the repeal of Net Neutrality.

by Valgora » Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:11 pm
United Citizens of North America wrote:Valgora wrote:
The right to bear arms.
Both parties are authoritarian.
If you fail to see that the Democratic party is authoritarian, then you are too partisan to a fault. It would be comparable to me not realizing that Stalin was authoritarian (no, I'm not saying the Democratic party similar to Stalin).
I can see where that "authoritarian streak" comes from (corporocratic Dems, Obama's drone spying), but Democrats weren't the party passing the Patriot Act. We haven't supported the repeal of Net Neutrality.
MT+FanT+some PMT
Multi-species.
Current gov't:
Founded 2023
Currently 2027

by United Citizens of North America » Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:11 pm

by Valgora » Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:12 pm
United Citizens of North America wrote:Mujahidah wrote:
Dude I'm a registered Democrat. I'm not going to go support the GOP. I'm just saying maybe know who you're talking about before trying to call them a hypocrite.
That's what I was saying. His gun policies are as far right as they go, but I don't know what he thinks on healthcare, immigration, etc.
MT+FanT+some PMT
Multi-species.
Current gov't:
Founded 2023
Currently 2027

by Telconi » Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:12 pm
United Citizens of North America wrote:Telconi wrote:
Artificially limiting the arguments makes no sense.
"I don't need insurance because the likelihood of a plane crashing on my car is astronomically low and I'm only going to measure plane crash related auto damage when considering my risks."
There are so many possible threats to my security that range from foreign countries to Joe the crack addict.
And these threats can best be solved by shooting Joe the crackpot with an AR-15? We live in America, people. It is not like we are in a war zone.

by Mujahidah » Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:12 pm
United Citizens of North America wrote:Mujahidah wrote:
Dude I'm a registered Democrat. I'm not going to go support the GOP. I'm just saying maybe know who you're talking about before trying to call them a hypocrite.
That's what I was saying. His gun policies are as far right as they go, but I don't know what he thinks on healthcare, immigration, etc.
The Parkus Empire wrote:To paraphrase my hero, Richard Nixon: she's pink right down to her hijab.
The Parkus Empire wrote:I misjudged you, you are much more smarter than I gave you credit for.
Northern Davincia wrote:Can we engrave this in a plaque?
The Parkus Empire wrote:I am not sure I'm entirely comfortable with a woman being this well informed, but I'll try not to judge.
The Parkus Empire wrote:Ah, m'lady, if I were a heathen I'd wed thee four times

by Washington Resistance Army » Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:12 pm
United Citizens of North America wrote:Mujahidah wrote:
Dude I'm a registered Democrat. I'm not going to go support the GOP. I'm just saying maybe know who you're talking about before trying to call them a hypocrite.
That's what I was saying. His gun policies are as far right as they go, but I don't know what he thinks on healthcare, immigration, etc.

by United Citizens of North America » Thu Mar 29, 2018 9:13 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:United Citizens of North America wrote:
I can see where that "authoritarian streak" comes from (corporocratic Dems, Obama's drone spying), but Democrats weren't the party passing the Patriot Act. We haven't supported the repeal of Net Neutrality.
You sure as shit helped.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Commonwealth Of Cursedland, Eahland, Great Britain-and Northern Ireland, Neder Islands, NewAlbion, Nilokeras, Ostroeuropa, Outer Armatonisdaristan, Port Carverton, Ruaun, Rusozak, Saarland-Westpalia, Southwest Horizonia, The Two Jerseys, Valrifell, Valyxias, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement