Vassenor wrote:Kramanica wrote:I have not assumed anything. I stipulated in my post in which I provided the source that data from them should be taken with a grain of salt because they are highly innacurate.
Your entire premise is "the CBO has a history of inaccurate predictions ergo this is an inaccurate prediction". That is, by definition, an assumption.
I said it should be taken with a grain of salt.
What part of that do you not understand?
You're the one citing data from an innacurate body. If I cited you some study from Breitbart would you believe it? The fallacy of yours.





