The Olog-Hai wrote:Impaled Nazarene wrote:But now you know that Hyperspace ramming is a good idea and that I was right.
Listen, if hyperspace ramming actually worked like that, the death star would be obsolete. Just send an unmanned fighter through a planet. Lava spews everywhere, massive fuckery, everyone dies, but it's still usable.
That IS how it works. Scientists figured it out about 1.5 years before the movie came out. Hence why it was in my sig.
God for fucks sake do some physics calculations. Mass x Acceleration. A car going 100mph does a lot more damage to a small building than a car going 70mph. Now calculate the dimensions of the other object.
Same car going 100mph hitting a solid reinforced steel pillar or a thick wall of concrete will not do shit beyond a dent or cracks respectively. Assuming the Death Star is denser than a moon of equal due to being made of military grade steel an X-Wing ramming it wouldn't do much unless it lines up perfectly with the exhaust port. An Imperial II star destroyer however hyperspace ramming the death star would cause catastrophic damage and likely would do the same to a planet. Hell it's shape makes it easier. It's somewhat cone/pyramid shaped and would smash into the planet with tremendous force. Think doomsday meteor.
I'm tired of these damn star wars fans complaining about physics.
Genivaria wrote:Still prefer Rogue One though.
Below mediocre for the first two thirds. Last third is amazing. Worst of the new Star Wars Movies and only a chunk better than the prequels.









