by Meryuma » Sat Sep 18, 2010 3:34 pm
Niur wrote: my soul has no soul.
Saint Clair Island wrote:The English language sucks. From now on, I will refer to the second definition of sexual as "fucktacular."
Trotskylvania wrote:Alternatively, we could go on an epic quest to Plato's Cave to find the legendary artifact, Ockham's Razor.
Norstal wrote:Gunpowder Plot: America.
Meryuma: "Well, I just hope these hyperboles don't...
*puts on sunglasses*
blow out of proportions."
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
by MisanthropicPopulism » Sat Sep 18, 2010 3:37 pm
by Wamitoria » Sat Sep 18, 2010 3:38 pm
Meryuma wrote:Do we need government for free health care?
by Wa no Kuni » Sat Sep 18, 2010 3:47 pm
by Chrobalta » Sat Sep 18, 2010 3:47 pm
by South Lorenya » Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:03 pm
by Londim » Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:15 pm
by Wolffbaden » Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:17 pm
by Fartsniffage » Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:18 pm
Londim wrote:This is why I like the nhs. For all it's flaws, at least it's not paying at the point of access. Taxes take care of that problem
by Londim » Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:19 pm
by Fartsniffage » Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:22 pm
Londim wrote:Well, apart from the teeth. We'll let have the private sector have them. Y'know, throw them a bone to keep them happy.
by Nazi Flower Power » Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:24 pm
South Lorenya wrote:Free health care means that someone else is paying for all the costs involved; in normal times it's possible that charitable contributions will cover the entire expenses, but if something major comes up -- such as, say, a major earthquake leveling a caribbean capital or a worldwide pandemic that's more than just hype-- charitable contributions will not be enough to handle the influx of needed medical care.
by Wolffbaden » Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:29 pm
Nazi Flower Power wrote:South Lorenya wrote:Free health care means that someone else is paying for all the costs involved; in normal times it's possible that charitable contributions will cover the entire expenses, but if something major comes up -- such as, say, a major earthquake leveling a caribbean capital or a worldwide pandemic that's more than just hype-- charitable contributions will not be enough to handle the influx of needed medical care.
Even in normal times, charitable contributions won't pay for the quality of care most people want.
by Helertia » Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:32 pm
Nazi Flower Power wrote:South Lorenya wrote:Free health care means that someone else is paying for all the costs involved; in normal times it's possible that charitable contributions will cover the entire expenses, but if something major comes up -- such as, say, a major earthquake leveling a caribbean capital or a worldwide pandemic that's more than just hype-- charitable contributions will not be enough to handle the influx of needed medical care.
Even in normal times, charitable contributions won't pay for the quality of care most people want.
by Nom Nom Germany » Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:34 pm
by Wolffbaden » Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:37 pm
by Sibirsky » Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:50 pm
by Sibirsky » Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:55 pm
Wolffbaden wrote:Why is it a business today? Because very few people in history ever took the initiative (in the United States, anyway) to prevent it from falling into the hands of people who were just in the industry to make money and nothing else. A better question would be why is this still an issue today in 2010? Why is it that the United States is still having this much controversy over universal health care when almost every other country in the West- including Germany (which was the country that first created the concept universal health care under Chancellor Otto von Bismarck during his social and welfare reforms of the 1880s), France, the Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, Canada, the United Kingdom, Spain, and Portugal, among others-- has adopted the system already? Even Cuba has universal health care FFS.
by Sibirsky » Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:56 pm
Nazi Flower Power wrote:South Lorenya wrote:Free health care means that someone else is paying for all the costs involved; in normal times it's possible that charitable contributions will cover the entire expenses, but if something major comes up -- such as, say, a major earthquake leveling a caribbean capital or a worldwide pandemic that's more than just hype-- charitable contributions will not be enough to handle the influx of needed medical care.
Even in normal times, charitable contributions won't pay for the quality of care most people want.
by Wamitoria » Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:56 pm
Sibirsky wrote:You know who else has universal healthcare? North Korea.
by Sibirsky » Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:59 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Singaporen Empire, The Holy Therns
Advertisement