Petrasylvania wrote:And the military still has ways to go with gender relations.
It's supposed to break shit and fuck up people, not be a Goddamn social experiment, but that's for another thread.
Advertisement

by Oil exporting People » Wed Dec 27, 2017 5:37 pm
Petrasylvania wrote:And the military still has ways to go with gender relations.

by Fartsniffage » Wed Dec 27, 2017 5:40 pm
by Risottia » Wed Dec 27, 2017 5:43 pm
The Parkus Empire wrote:Should men and women be boarded together in prison and the military?Ifreann wrote:Sounds good to me.
I argue no, because forcing cohabitation is not considerate of a lot of religious sensitibilities, and because people who are married or in relationships might not be progressive enough to be comfortable with that.

by Uxupox » Wed Dec 27, 2017 6:13 pm
Risottia wrote:The Parkus Empire wrote:Should men and women be boarded together in prison and the military?
I argue no, because forcing cohabitation is not considerate of a lot of religious sensitibilities, and because people who are married or in relationships might not be progressive enough to be comfortable with that.
In the military? Yes, if the situation makes giving everyone their single room impossible (let's say, a submarine?). If one can't think but with their own genitals, they should search for job other than being a soldier.
In prison? Nay, cells should be single all the time.


by Dazchan » Wed Dec 27, 2017 6:47 pm
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote: The whole "fear of child support bills" is removed, as no one's going to want to hire them when they get out, so they figure they have nothing left to lose by having spawn conceived by criminals and raised in the womb with criminal genes and a prisoner's diet.

by Internationalist Bastard » Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:06 pm

by United Muscovite Nations » Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:07 pm

by The Black Party » Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:09 pm

by Internationalist Bastard » Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:10 pm
United Muscovite Nations wrote:I don't think women should be allowed in the military, and prisons should be sex-segregated, yes, but for different reasons.

by United Muscovite Nations » Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:12 pm

by Internationalist Bastard » Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:14 pm
United Muscovite Nations wrote:Internationalist Bastard wrote:I can shoot a gun and march better then you, ol' boy
The reason I don't think women should be in the military has very little to do with their qualifications. In situations of national emergency, you need to maintain as high a number of reproductive females as possible. The military can reduce that number and be harmful. Demographically, men are expendable, because a population can bounce back with relatively few men, but if you lose a significant number of women, then it can lead to demographic catastrophe. This is why wars in prehistoric times were often fought over women as a breeding population.

by The Black Party » Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:15 pm

by Oil exporting People » Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:16 pm
Internationalist Bastard wrote:I can shoot a gun and march better then you, ol' boy

by Fartsniffage » Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:16 pm
United Muscovite Nations wrote:Internationalist Bastard wrote:I can shoot a gun and march better then you, ol' boy
The reason I don't think women should be in the military has very little to do with their qualifications. In situations of national emergency, you need to maintain as high a number of reproductive females as possible. The military can reduce that number and be harmful. Demographically, men are expendable, because a population can bounce back with relatively few men, but if you lose a significant number of women, then it can lead to demographic catastrophe. This is why wars in prehistoric times were often fought over women as a breeding population.

by Internationalist Bastard » Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:16 pm

by United Muscovite Nations » Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:17 pm
Internationalist Bastard wrote:United Muscovite Nations wrote:The reason I don't think women should be in the military has very little to do with their qualifications. In situations of national emergency, you need to maintain as high a number of reproductive females as possible. The military can reduce that number and be harmful. Demographically, men are expendable, because a population can bounce back with relatively few men, but if you lose a significant number of women, then it can lead to demographic catastrophe. This is why wars in prehistoric times were often fought over women as a breeding population.
Well why not non-reproductive females? Why not in times of minor conflict?

by Oil exporting People » Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:18 pm
United Muscovite Nations wrote:The reason I don't think women should be in the military has very little to do with their qualifications. In situations of national emergency, you need to maintain as high a number of reproductive females as possible. The military can reduce that number and be harmful. Demographically, men are expendable, because a population can bounce back with relatively few men, but if you lose a significant number of women, then it can lead to demographic catastrophe. This is why wars in prehistoric times were often fought over women as a breeding population.

by Internationalist Bastard » Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:18 pm

by United Muscovite Nations » Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:19 pm

by Internationalist Bastard » Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:19 pm
Oil exporting People wrote:United Muscovite Nations wrote:The reason I don't think women should be in the military has very little to do with their qualifications. In situations of national emergency, you need to maintain as high a number of reproductive females as possible. The military can reduce that number and be harmful. Demographically, men are expendable, because a population can bounce back with relatively few men, but if you lose a significant number of women, then it can lead to demographic catastrophe. This is why wars in prehistoric times were often fought over women as a breeding population.
Women make shit soldiers, let's not beat around the bush on that either.

by Oil exporting People » Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:19 pm
Internationalist Bastard wrote:I've been over this. I married a man. I'm sorry love is a crime, but it doesn't change that being a soldier was the one thing I was good at

by United Muscovite Nations » Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:19 pm
Oil exporting People wrote:United Muscovite Nations wrote:The reason I don't think women should be in the military has very little to do with their qualifications. In situations of national emergency, you need to maintain as high a number of reproductive females as possible. The military can reduce that number and be harmful. Demographically, men are expendable, because a population can bounce back with relatively few men, but if you lose a significant number of women, then it can lead to demographic catastrophe. This is why wars in prehistoric times were often fought over women as a breeding population.
Women make shit soldiers, let's not beat around the bush on that either.

by Internationalist Bastard » Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:20 pm

by Oil exporting People » Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:20 pm
Internationalist Bastard wrote:Except I'm a better soldier then you'll ever be, and no several others

by Internationalist Bastard » Wed Dec 27, 2017 8:20 pm
Oil exporting People wrote:Internationalist Bastard wrote:I've been over this. I married a man. I'm sorry love is a crime, but it doesn't change that being a soldier was the one thing I was good at
Which further proves my point; you knew what the regulations and lifestyle of such entailed, and willing didn't follow through on them.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: DutchFormosa, Eahland, Estangzelia and Latang, Fartsniffage, Femboy Republics, Grand Baslandia, Kurgao, Narilamb, New Halo, Nubilis, Omnicidal Onion Organization, Shrillland, Spirit of Hope, The Two Jerseys, Umeria, UNITYUNITYUNITY
Advertisement