He was oddly one of the more preferable Republicans, but we don't need more Bush' in office.
Advertisement

by The Black Forrest » Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:11 pm
The Union of Crown Kingdoms wrote:
Well, in a state like California, which does not need voter ID and is a "sanctuary state", it's a fair assumption to assume some of the hundreds of thousands of illegals walked up to the voter booth, said "I'm Juan Martinez and I am a US citizen", signed that paper saying he solemnly swears that he is one (even though he aint and they have no way of proving it that very moment), and ticked off the Clinton/Kaine boxes on the ballot.
Not enough to flip the state of California, definitely (CA be liberal af), but perhaps a county.

by Corrian » Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:13 pm
Bombadil wrote:Arlenton wrote:Vote for a pedophile who happens to more represent your views. Or vote for a guy who does not represent you at all but happens to not be a pedophile.
If I were them I'd write in.
Yes I’m sure the nuanced policy points of both candidates has been the key discussion of this election over ‘us and them’. ‘Not represent you at all’, he’s white, he’s American, he appears to believe in the Constitution and rule of law and abide by it’ - I mean what’s really the result in effect, Alabama won’t turn into a godless hippie wonderland..
..but you can’t complain about being stereotyped if you actually vote in a stereotype.

by Washington Resistance Army » Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:14 pm
Bombadil wrote:Arlenton wrote:Vote for a pedophile who happens to more represent your views. Or vote for a guy who does not represent you at all but happens to not be a pedophile.
If I were them I'd write in.
Yes I’m sure the nuanced policy points of both candidates has been the key discussion of this election over ‘us and them’. ‘Not represent you at all’, he’s white, he’s American, he appears to believe in the Constitution and rule of law and abide by it’ - I mean what’s really the result in effect, Alabama won’t turn into a godless hippie wonderland..
..but you can’t complain about being stereotyped if you actually vote in a stereotype.

by The Black Forrest » Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:14 pm

by Arlenton » Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:14 pm

by Cekoviu » Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:16 pm

by The Black Forrest » Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:16 pm
Arlenton wrote:Corrian wrote:He was oddly one of the more preferable Republicans, but we don't need more Bush' in office.
What's even more odd is that he has this "moderate hero" image for some reason. If elected, he'd of been on of the most conservative presidents, if not the most conservative president, we've ever had.

by Corrian » Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:16 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:It's not even multiple policy points, it's abortion. If the Dems ran a pro-life candidate they'd be cruising to an easy win.

Arlenton wrote:Corrian wrote:He was oddly one of the more preferable Republicans, but we don't need more Bush' in office.
What's even more odd is that he has this "moderate hero" image for some reason. If elected, he'd of been on of the most conservative presidents, if not the most conservative president, we've ever had.

by Telconi » Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:16 pm
Arlenton wrote:Corrian wrote:He was oddly one of the more preferable Republicans, but we don't need more Bush' in office.
What's even more odd is that he has this "moderate hero" image for some reason. If elected, he'd of been on of the most conservative presidents, if not the most conservative president, we've ever had.

by Telconi » Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:17 pm
Corrian wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:It's not even multiple policy points, it's abortion. If the Dems ran a pro-life candidate they'd be cruising to an easy win.
But you don't get funding if you're pro-lifeArlenton wrote:What's even more odd is that he has this "moderate hero" image for some reason. If elected, he'd of been on of the most conservative presidents, if not the most conservative president, we've ever had.
Eeeww, even more reason for no Bush'.
Just imagine if this had happened:
Bush, then Clinton, then Bush, then Clinton, and then a Bush.
Like...That would have just been a sad state of affairs to be honest.

by The Black Forrest » Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:18 pm

by Arlenton » Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:18 pm
Corrian wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:It's not even multiple policy points, it's abortion. If the Dems ran a pro-life candidate they'd be cruising to an easy win.
But you don't get funding if you're pro-lifeArlenton wrote:What's even more odd is that he has this "moderate hero" image for some reason. If elected, he'd of been on of the most conservative presidents, if not the most conservative president, we've ever had.
Eeeww, even more reason for no Bush'.
Just imagine if this had happened:
Bush, then Clinton, then Bush, then Clinton, and then a Bush.
Like...That would have just been a sad state of affairs to be honest.

by Cekoviu » Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:19 pm
Arlenton wrote:Corrian wrote:He was oddly one of the more preferable Republicans, but we don't need more Bush' in office.
What's even more odd is that he has this "moderate hero" image for some reason. If elected, he'd of been on of the most conservative presidents, if not the most conservative president, we've ever had.

by Bombadil » Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:19 pm
Corrian wrote:Bombadil wrote:
Yes I’m sure the nuanced policy points of both candidates has been the key discussion of this election over ‘us and them’. ‘Not represent you at all’, he’s white, he’s American, he appears to believe in the Constitution and rule of law and abide by it’ - I mean what’s really the result in effect, Alabama won’t turn into a godless hippie wonderland..
..but you can’t complain about being stereotyped if you actually vote in a stereotype.
The fact the election is even close shows that there are a lot breaking away from "That stereotype" and if it really is close, generalizing, say, 48% or 49% of people into the rest of the stereotype is bad.

by Arlenton » Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:20 pm

by The Black Forrest » Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:20 pm
Arlenton wrote:Corrian wrote:But you don't get funding if you're pro-life
Eeeww, even more reason for no Bush'.
Just imagine if this had happened:
Bush, then Clinton, then Bush, then Clinton, and then a Bush.
Like...That would have just been a sad state of affairs to be honest.
I'd personally think only the Clinton terms were the sad ones.

by Cekoviu » Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:21 pm
Bombadil wrote:Corrian wrote:The fact the election is even close shows that there are a lot breaking away from "That stereotype" and if it really is close, generalizing, say, 48% or 49% of people into the rest of the stereotype is bad.
Well, we don’t know if it’s close and, to be fair, we don’t know whether Jones will romp to victory. Yet I find it just as condescending to say ‘oh leave them alone, they’re good decent people at heart and calling them racist will just antagonise them’ when the result is they keep voting in racists.

by Arlenton » Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:22 pm
Cekoviu wrote:Arlenton wrote:What's even more odd is that he has this "moderate hero" image for some reason. If elected, he'd of been on of the most conservative presidents, if not the most conservative president, we've ever had.
He was moderate in comparison to most of the other Republican candidates except John Kasich.

by Telconi » Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:23 pm
Bombadil wrote:Corrian wrote:The fact the election is even close shows that there are a lot breaking away from "That stereotype" and if it really is close, generalizing, say, 48% or 49% of people into the rest of the stereotype is bad.
Well, we don’t know if it’s close and, to be fair, we don’t know whether Jones will romp to victory. Yet I find it just as condescending to say ‘oh leave them alone, they’re good decent people at heart and calling them racist will just antagonise them’ when the result is they keep voting in racists.

by Imperializt Russia » Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:23 pm
The Union of Crown Kingdoms wrote:The allegations against Moore have been debunked,
The Union of Crown Kingdoms wrote:Telconi wrote:
Sauce?
https://imgur.com/DMd1iOw
It's obvious she added everything past "Roy" on the signature...and she did a piss poor job at it, using a different color pen...

by Corrian » Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:23 pm
Cekoviu wrote:Bombadil wrote:
Well, we don’t know if it’s close and, to be fair, we don’t know whether Jones will romp to victory. Yet I find it just as condescending to say ‘oh leave them alone, they’re good decent people at heart and calling them racist will just antagonise them’ when the result is they keep voting in racists.
The problem is that when you stereotype people from Alabama as racist when not everyone actually votes for a racist, you're hurting the reputation of the ones who aren't.

by Arlenton » Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:24 pm
Telconi wrote:Bombadil wrote:
Well, we don’t know if it’s close and, to be fair, we don’t know whether Jones will romp to victory. Yet I find it just as condescending to say ‘oh leave them alone, they’re good decent people at heart and calling them racist will just antagonise them’ when the result is they keep voting in racists.
Pro tip: People don't push back against perceived attacks on their values when they don't perceive an attack on their values...

by Bombadil » Tue Dec 12, 2017 1:24 pm
Cekoviu wrote:Bombadil wrote:
Well, we don’t know if it’s close and, to be fair, we don’t know whether Jones will romp to victory. Yet I find it just as condescending to say ‘oh leave them alone, they’re good decent people at heart and calling them racist will just antagonise them’ when the result is they keep voting in racists.
The problem is that when you stereotype people from Alabama as racist when not everyone actually votes for a racist, you're hurting the reputation of the ones who aren't.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cole Whyte-Gurney, Dacarbatia, Duvniask, Google [Bot], Gotland and Oland, Kewelsburg, Marenmia-Ocasia, North Seldom, Satreburg 2, Slembana, Vrindi
Advertisement