The spectre of the ANGLO
Advertisement


by Saiwania » Wed Nov 15, 2017 6:55 pm

by Conserative Morality » Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:03 pm
Saiwania wrote:I've officially joined the Temperance Movement and now consider myself apart of it. I've seen firsthand the evil of alcohol. I used to drink only on holidays but no more- now I banish all alcohol as one of the "filths of the Earth" along with Tobacco and Marijuana, among other potentially harmful substances that don't immediately come to mind.
My father has lived quite a sad and pathetic life too addicted to the damned stuff, he is in the process of dying soon should he continue- and all indications are that he will. No amount of effort can keep him from it.
I know full well that plenty of people can handle alcohol responsibly, but I've still come to the conclusion that the world is better off without it. If allowed a chance at wielding enough power, I will finish what Prohibition started.

by The Parkus Empire » Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:04 pm
Herskerstad wrote:Guys take it to the CDT, or make an ethics thread.

by Salus Maior » Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:04 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Saiwania wrote:I've officially joined the Temperance Movement and now consider myself apart of it. I've seen firsthand the evil of alcohol. I used to drink only on holidays but no more- now I banish all alcohol as one of the "filths of the Earth" along with Tobacco and Marijuana, among other potentially harmful substances that don't immediately come to mind.
My father has lived quite a sad and pathetic life too addicted to the damned stuff, he is in the process of dying soon should he continue- and all indications are that he will. No amount of effort can keep him from it.
I know full well that plenty of people can handle alcohol responsibly, but I've still come to the conclusion that the world is better off without it. If allowed a chance at wielding enough power, I will finish what Prohibition started.
Rampant crime and corruption?


by The Parkus Empire » Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:08 pm


by Northern Davincia » Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:11 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:"Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Hoppe."

by Herskerstad » Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:12 pm

by The Parkus Empire » Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:12 pm

by Herskerstad » Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:13 pm

by Minzerland II » Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:13 pm
War Gears wrote:Recommend me a right-wing book.
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)


by Minzerland II » Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:28 pm
Herskerstad wrote:The Parkus Empire wrote:We all know ethics have no place in the right wing thread. :^)
I would refer to the OP. Generally I don't care too much as long as the topics do not become thread consuming and unrelated to which time it is common to turn to another topic.
This one no doubt will inspire difference of opinion. Was the treaty of Trianon justified?
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)

by Taihei Tengoku » Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:32 pm

by Conserative Morality » Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:32 pm
Minzerland II wrote:Herskerstad wrote:
I would refer to the OP. Generally I don't care too much as long as the topics do not become thread consuming and unrelated to which time it is common to turn to another topic.
This one no doubt will inspire difference of opinion. Was the treaty of Trianon justified?
No. It was too harsh on the Hungarians, tbh. It was punishing Hungary for the actions of Austria. There was no negotiation either, it was simply dictated to them and that caused a great deal of bitterness amongst the Hungarians; no wonder they sided with the Nazis.

by The East Marches II » Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:33 pm
Taihei Tengoku wrote:Hungary voted against World War I so if anybody was blameless it was them

by Herskerstad » Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:37 pm
Minzerland II wrote:Herskerstad wrote:
I would refer to the OP. Generally I don't care too much as long as the topics do not become thread consuming and unrelated to which time it is common to turn to another topic.
This one no doubt will inspire difference of opinion. Was the treaty of Trianon justified?
No. It was too harsh on the Hungarians, tbh. It was punishing Hungary for the actions of Austria. There was no negotiation either, it was simply dictated to them and that caused a great deal of bitterness amongst the Hungarians; no wonder they sided with the Nazis.

by Minzerland II » Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:40 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Minzerland II wrote:No. It was too harsh on the Hungarians, tbh. It was punishing Hungary for the actions of Austria. There was no negotiation either, it was simply dictated to them and that caused a great deal of bitterness amongst the Hungarians; no wonder they sided with the Nazis.
"First time we sided with the Germans we lost everything let's do it again"
Truly proof of the Hungarian genius at work
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)

by The Parkus Empire » Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:45 pm
War Gears wrote:Recommend me a right-wing book.

by Conserative Morality » Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:47 pm
Minzerland II wrote:The Germans had given the Hungarians more reasons, most important of which being territorial concessions, to side with them than the Allies ever did, especially because the Germans had successfully invaded France months beforehand and Poland prior to that..

by Minzerland II » Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:55 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Minzerland II wrote:The Germans had given the Hungarians more reasons, most important of which being territorial concessions, to side with them than the Allies ever did, especially because the Germans had successfully invaded France months beforehand and Poland prior to that..
Apparently we didn't punish them hard enough last time then to teach them their lesson. It is not gold which buys loyalty, but steel. If they can be bribed, they have not been sufficiently cowed. t. Vlad the Impaler
Herskerstad wrote:Minzerland II wrote:No. It was too harsh on the Hungarians, tbh. It was punishing Hungary for the actions of Austria. There was no negotiation either, it was simply dictated to them and that caused a great deal of bitterness amongst the Hungarians; no wonder they sided with the Nazis.
The nations had agreed on a common foreign policy ever since the end of the rebellion and political reconsiliation, and what constituted hungary, even though core territories was lost, still had a remarkable amount of minorities which was less than comfortable with the rule of the nobility there, which while savvy in the 18th century, had been ass-backwards in the 19th and 20th.
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)

by Conserative Morality » Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:56 pm
Minzerland II wrote:That would have made the situation worse, though, I think.

by Minzerland II » Wed Nov 15, 2017 7:59 pm
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Chess Socialism, Look What You Did Its All Your Fault, Lothria, Pasong Tirad, Revived Unclear, The Orson Empire, Yerachmeal
Advertisement