Advertisement
by Militsia » Tue Sep 14, 2010 10:57 am
by The Imperial Navy » Tue Sep 14, 2010 10:57 am
Militsia wrote:I wonder how it would be handled if an american teen had written a hateful e-mail addressed to Gordon Brown?
by Ruthless Slaughter » Tue Sep 14, 2010 10:58 am
by Ochry » Tue Sep 14, 2010 10:59 am
Militsia wrote:I wonder how it would be handled if an american teen had written a hateful e-mail addressed to Gordon Brown?
by Unchecked Expansion » Tue Sep 14, 2010 10:59 am
by Birnadia » Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:00 am
Militsia wrote:I wonder how it would be handled if an american teen had written a hateful e-mail addressed to Gordon Brown?
by Militsia » Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:02 am
by Wilgrove » Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:02 am
Basementees wrote:Wilgrove wrote:
Someone who is sending threats and abuses towards a public figure isn't a boy "being silly" or boys being boys. It's an asshole who broke the law. There's a reason that threats of any kind are illegal, and I suggest you read up on that.
It said he was Pissed and High.
Don't tell me you've never done something idiotic/foolish/illegal when you've had those combinations.
I mean, most of the teenage population have done those things without being Pissed or High.
by Georgism » Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:03 am
Great Nepal wrote:1. Okay.... what is law about private consumption of alcohol? - I thought it was the same...
2. How is it different? He threatened Obama, and saying he was high can be considered as excuse so what cant I "threaten" Westminster and say I was high?
by Wilgrove » Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:04 am
Ochry wrote:I find this stupid. He's a drunken kid, and kids often believe in idiotic things before it's knocked out of them by the twin power of maturity and cynicism. He's no threat to America, and people in the US themselves have said much worse and actually dangerous things about Obama, and get away with it scot free. Where's his freedom of speech?
If you seriously thing that some juvenile muggins has a chance of being anything more than all talk, no trousers, I'm afraid to say that you're pretty mistaken.
by You-Gi-Owe » Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:04 am
by Ochry » Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:06 am
by Nobel Hobos » Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:06 am
by Wilgrove » Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:07 am
Neu Mitanni wrote:One of the plethora of Obamunist idiocies that will be reversed after January 20, 2013, when we get a REAL AMERICAN President and B-HOle's Kenyan ass is shipped back where he came from.
by Ochry » Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:09 am
Wilgrove wrote:Yea....threats and verbal abuse is not covered by the 1st amendment, thanks for playing though.
by The Bleeding Roses » Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:10 am
by Wilgrove » Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:10 am
You-Gi-Owe wrote:From what I've seen, banning the kid is probably the normal legal action.
But I can't shake the feeling that if this had happened during the Bush(43) Administration that there'd be a lot of liberals screaming, "bloody murder!"
by Farnhamia » Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:11 am
by The Written Word » Tue Sep 14, 2010 11:14 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Barinive, Cinnaa, El Lazaro, Eragon Island, Gorutimania, Hekp, Ioszari, Legio LXI, Pasong Tirad, Soviet Haaregrad, The Astral Mandate, The Kaisers Syndicates, Vrbo, Xind
Advertisement