NATION

PASSWORD

Gun Control

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Am I right?

Yeah, mostly, seems agreeable.
223
22%
Dunno/Not sure/Not American and I think that matters
68
7%
Nah, you're crazy. Guns should be more restricted.
204
20%
Nah, you're crazy. Guns should be less restricted.
436
44%
JC Christ CM come back when the meds wear off
71
7%
 
Total votes : 1002

User avatar
Valgora
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6621
Founded: Mar 23, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Valgora » Mon Oct 23, 2017 1:49 pm

Calixicanuss wrote:
Valgora wrote:
It's incredibly difficult to make and pass amendments.

Article V of the Constitution:

"The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate."

So you don't have to read all of it because I wouldn't want to either:

"The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments ... ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress ..."


If it gets crazy enough that one amendment can be repealed, there's no doubt in my mind that congress would be crazy enough to repeal others. If the Democrats get the majority, and vote to repeal gun rights, whats to stop them from banning conservative ideologies next? they've already proven they have the numbers to repeal an ammendmant

Prohibition was different " and was justly banned" as it was causing massive problems in the country. Guns and free speech don't cause nearly the same amount of problems. No matter what the propaganda outlets say.


I'm just letting you know that it can be changed. And that it is very difficult to do so.
Having a majority in Congress ain't gonna get an amendment. 2/3 is difficult to get; hell, just 50% can be difficult to get.
Then the states need to ratify it.

You don't have that much to worry about. Plus, if we have guns, we can defend our first amendment rights.
Libertarian Syndicalist
Not state capitalist

MT+FanT+some PMT
Multi-species.
Current gov't:
Founded 2023
Currently 2027

DISREGARD NS STATS
Link to factbooks-Forum Factbook-Q&A-Embassy
The Reverend Tim
Ordained Dudeist Priest
IRL Me
Luxemburgist/Syndicalist, brony, metalhead
Valgora =+/-IRL views
8 Values

Pro - Socialism/communism, Palestine, space exploration, left libertarianism, BLM, Gun Rights, LGBTQ, Industrial Hemp
Anti - Trump, Hillary, capitalism, authoritarianism, Gun Control, Police, UN, electric cars, Automation of the workforce
Sometimes, I like to think of myself as the Commie version of Dale Gribble.

User avatar
United Islamic Commonwealth
Senator
 
Posts: 4657
Founded: Mar 26, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Islamic Commonwealth » Mon Oct 23, 2017 1:50 pm

Republic of Keshiland wrote:
Valgora wrote:
Do you even fucking know what these amendments are?
Do you know what they fuckin' do?

Because I'm pretty sure you have no fuckin' idea.


Do you want prohibition back? Because that's what the 21st Amendment ended.

The 3A violation will never happen again

I've literally never heard someone complain about this amendment before. Why exactly do you want it gone?
The United Islamic Commonwealth | Islamic republic | Factbook
Population: 135,931,000 | Area: 2,663,077 km² | Location: Middle East
Excidium Planetis Index: Tier 6; Level 0; Level 5 | Current year: 2020
Supreme Leader: Abbas Mosuli
President: Haashid al-Abdulla
Former Nizari Ismaili Muslim living in the US.

User avatar
Greater Redosia
Minister
 
Posts: 3427
Founded: Aug 01, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Redosia » Mon Oct 23, 2017 1:52 pm

Republic of Keshiland wrote:
Valgora wrote:
Do you even fucking know what these amendments are?
Do you know what they fuckin' do?

Because I'm pretty sure you have no fuckin' idea.


Do you want prohibition back? Because that's what the 21st Amendment ended.



Yes I want the ban of alcohol gone #IncreaseofOrganizedCrime, #IncreaseofMafia, #putallthepeoplewhoworkforalcoholcompaniesoutofthejobsincethealcoholindustryprovidesalotofjobstopeople


I fixed it. For that is what happened when prohibition came in.

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Mon Oct 23, 2017 1:52 pm

United Islamic Commonwealth wrote:
Republic of Keshiland wrote:The 3A violation will never happen again

I've literally never heard someone complain about this amendment before. Why exactly do you want it gone?


It would prevent him from implementing his dystopian police state.

Don't need a warrant if the gestapo lives in your house!
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
United Islamic Commonwealth
Senator
 
Posts: 4657
Founded: Mar 26, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Islamic Commonwealth » Mon Oct 23, 2017 1:53 pm

Telconi wrote:
United Islamic Commonwealth wrote:I've literally never heard someone complain about this amendment before. Why exactly do you want it gone?


It would prevent him from implementing his dystopian police state.

Don't need a warrant if the gestapo lives in your house!

I mean, if that is his goal, sure. But I'm sitting here honestly trying to think of a reason that matches the conventional American mindset and I just can't.
The United Islamic Commonwealth | Islamic republic | Factbook
Population: 135,931,000 | Area: 2,663,077 km² | Location: Middle East
Excidium Planetis Index: Tier 6; Level 0; Level 5 | Current year: 2020
Supreme Leader: Abbas Mosuli
President: Haashid al-Abdulla
Former Nizari Ismaili Muslim living in the US.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Mon Oct 23, 2017 1:54 pm

United Islamic Commonwealth wrote:
Telconi wrote:
It would prevent him from implementing his dystopian police state.

Don't need a warrant if the gestapo lives in your house!

I mean, if that is his goal, sure. But I'm sitting here honestly trying to think of a reason that matches the conventional American mindset and I just can't.

Keshi is not a conventional American by any stretch. Thank goodness.

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Mon Oct 23, 2017 1:55 pm

United Islamic Commonwealth wrote:
Telconi wrote:
It would prevent him from implementing his dystopian police state.

Don't need a warrant if the gestapo lives in your house!

I mean, if that is his goal, sure. But I'm sitting here honestly trying to think of a reason that matches the conventional American mindset and I just can't.


You've mistakenly presumed Keshiland has aNY thing close to the typical American mindset. He has advocated for literal police states with standing authorization to search any and all property at any time. To search for a massive list of things he would outlaw.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
United Islamic Commonwealth
Senator
 
Posts: 4657
Founded: Mar 26, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Islamic Commonwealth » Mon Oct 23, 2017 1:56 pm

Telconi wrote:
United Islamic Commonwealth wrote:I mean, if that is his goal, sure. But I'm sitting here honestly trying to think of a reason that matches the conventional American mindset and I just can't.


You've mistakenly presumed Keshiland has aNY thing close to the typical American mindset. He has advocated for literal police states with standing authorization to search any and all property at any time. To search for a massive list of things he would outlaw.

So, he's a Stalinist?
The United Islamic Commonwealth | Islamic republic | Factbook
Population: 135,931,000 | Area: 2,663,077 km² | Location: Middle East
Excidium Planetis Index: Tier 6; Level 0; Level 5 | Current year: 2020
Supreme Leader: Abbas Mosuli
President: Haashid al-Abdulla
Former Nizari Ismaili Muslim living in the US.

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Mon Oct 23, 2017 1:56 pm

United Islamic Commonwealth wrote:
Telconi wrote:
You've mistakenly presumed Keshiland has aNY thing close to the typical American mindset. He has advocated for literal police states with standing authorization to search any and all property at any time. To search for a massive list of things he would outlaw.

So, he's a Stalinist?


He makes Stalin look like a mildly strict conservative.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Calixicanuss
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 61
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Calixicanuss » Mon Oct 23, 2017 1:56 pm

Telconi wrote:
United Islamic Commonwealth wrote:I mean, if that is his goal, sure. But I'm sitting here honestly trying to think of a reason that matches the conventional American mindset and I just can't.


You've mistakenly presumed Keshiland has aNY thing close to the typical American mindset. He has advocated for literal police states with standing authorization to search any and all property at any time. To search for a massive list of things he would outlaw.


lol, it sound like a parody nationstate.
Damnation starts with little steps, by arrogantly thinking that you are wiser than our great forbears, by tinkering with truth, by compromising, by departing from the straight and narrow path of the Emperor’s light.

RP's
The Origin and Present Struggle "takes place first chronologically"
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=425293
The Lightning War: Rise of Nations "takes place five years after the Origin and Present Struggle"
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=426145

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 79496
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Thermodolia » Mon Oct 23, 2017 1:56 pm

United Islamic Commonwealth wrote:
Telconi wrote:
You've mistakenly presumed Keshiland has aNY thing close to the typical American mindset. He has advocated for literal police states with standing authorization to search any and all property at any time. To search for a massive list of things he would outlaw.

So, he's a Stalinist?

Pretty much
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Mon Oct 23, 2017 1:57 pm

United Islamic Commonwealth wrote:
Telconi wrote:
You've mistakenly presumed Keshiland has aNY thing close to the typical American mindset. He has advocated for literal police states with standing authorization to search any and all property at any time. To search for a massive list of things he would outlaw.

So, he's a Stalinist?

Well...Totalitarian.

User avatar
Republic of Keshiland
Minister
 
Posts: 2164
Founded: Oct 21, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Republic of Keshiland » Mon Oct 23, 2017 1:58 pm

Sounds like grid lock and worse waiting to happen.


That is the strategy. To do everything possible to make it implode even to the point where we are presidentless for over a year so that people will get to the point where they will ask for the ducking popular vote to end the ducking election and remove the EC.

Why? Very democratic.


Because it removes gerrymandering.

Didn't work the first time, won't work the second. Also, aren't you in favor of legalizing most drugs?


I am in favour of legalising weed, sending users of all other illegal drugs to therapy to make them better and criminalising tobacco and alcohol, since the users of the last 2 are far more violent and dangerous then the rest
I am pro-life, anti-gun, pro-immigration, pro UHC, pro-free college, pro universal income, anti-war, anti-death penalty, pro-financial ade, pro anything that makes children's lives better.

I finally realised how messed up English was when I read a sign in French and could comprehend half of it despite never learning any French

User avatar
Valgora
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6621
Founded: Mar 23, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Valgora » Mon Oct 23, 2017 1:58 pm

United Islamic Commonwealth wrote:
Telconi wrote:
You've mistakenly presumed Keshiland has aNY thing close to the typical American mindset. He has advocated for literal police states with standing authorization to search any and all property at any time. To search for a massive list of things he would outlaw.

So, he's a Stalinist?


Not even American Stalinists are against guns.

The American Party of Labor, which is Hoxhaist, is against gun control.
Libertarian Syndicalist
Not state capitalist

MT+FanT+some PMT
Multi-species.
Current gov't:
Founded 2023
Currently 2027

DISREGARD NS STATS
Link to factbooks-Forum Factbook-Q&A-Embassy
The Reverend Tim
Ordained Dudeist Priest
IRL Me
Luxemburgist/Syndicalist, brony, metalhead
Valgora =+/-IRL views
8 Values

Pro - Socialism/communism, Palestine, space exploration, left libertarianism, BLM, Gun Rights, LGBTQ, Industrial Hemp
Anti - Trump, Hillary, capitalism, authoritarianism, Gun Control, Police, UN, electric cars, Automation of the workforce
Sometimes, I like to think of myself as the Commie version of Dale Gribble.

User avatar
Calixicanuss
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 61
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Calixicanuss » Mon Oct 23, 2017 2:00 pm

Republic of Keshiland wrote:
Sounds like grid lock and worse waiting to happen.


That is the strategy. To do everything possible to make it implode even to the point where we are presidentless for over a year so that people will get to the point where they will ask for the ducking popular vote to end the ducking election and remove the EC.

Why? Very democratic.


Because it removes gerrymandering.

Didn't work the first time, won't work the second. Also, aren't you in favor of legalizing most drugs?


I am in favour of legalising weed, sending users of all other illegal drugs to therapy to make them better and criminalising tobacco and alcohol, since the users of the last 2 are far more violent and dangerous then the rest


"Tobacco more violent than heroin"

Your joking right? heroin addicts will commit mass murder if it means getting their fix.

Most a tobacco addict will do is be really grouchy.
Damnation starts with little steps, by arrogantly thinking that you are wiser than our great forbears, by tinkering with truth, by compromising, by departing from the straight and narrow path of the Emperor’s light.

RP's
The Origin and Present Struggle "takes place first chronologically"
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=425293
The Lightning War: Rise of Nations "takes place five years after the Origin and Present Struggle"
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=426145

User avatar
Greater Redosia
Minister
 
Posts: 3427
Founded: Aug 01, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Redosia » Mon Oct 23, 2017 2:01 pm

Republic of Keshiland wrote:
Sounds like grid lock and worse waiting to happen.


That is the strategy. To do everything possible to make it implode even to the point where we are presidentless for over a year so that people will get to the point where they will ask for the ducking popular vote to end the ducking election and remove the EC.

Why? Very democratic.


Because it removes gerrymandering.

Didn't work the first time, won't work the second. Also, aren't you in favor of legalizing most drugs?


I am in favour of legalising weed, sending users of all other illegal drugs to therapy to make them better and criminalising tobacco and alcohol, since the users of the last 2 are far more violent and dangerous then the rest



Keshiland ever heard of the economy, it's shouting your name. it's saying "The Economy would literally implode due to lack of tobacco and alcohol since they make up a pretty nice amount of employed people and amount of money being brought in.

User avatar
Republic of Keshiland
Minister
 
Posts: 2164
Founded: Oct 21, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Republic of Keshiland » Mon Oct 23, 2017 2:02 pm

Greater Redosia wrote:
Republic of Keshiland wrote:
That is the strategy. To do everything possible to make it implode even to the point where we are presidentless for over a year so that people will get to the point where they will ask for the ducking popular vote to end the ducking election and remove the EC.



Because it removes gerrymandering.



I am in favour of legalising weed, sending users of all other illegal drugs to therapy to make them better and criminalising tobacco and alcohol, since the users of the last 2 are far more violent and dangerous then the rest



Keshiland ever heard of the economy, it's shouting your name. it's saying "The Economy would literally implode due to lack of tobacco and alcohol since they make up a pretty nice amount of employed people and amount of money being brought in.


Weed is more profitable then tobacco and alcohol its been proven in states where its legal
I am pro-life, anti-gun, pro-immigration, pro UHC, pro-free college, pro universal income, anti-war, anti-death penalty, pro-financial ade, pro anything that makes children's lives better.

I finally realised how messed up English was when I read a sign in French and could comprehend half of it despite never learning any French

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 79496
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Thermodolia » Mon Oct 23, 2017 2:02 pm

Republic of Keshiland wrote:
Sounds like grid lock and worse waiting to happen.


That is the strategy. To do everything possible to make it implode even to the point where we are presidentless for over a year so that people will get to the point where they will ask for the ducking popular vote to end the ducking election and remove the EC.

Why? Very democratic.


Because it removes gerrymandering.

You do know that the senate can't be gerrymandered as there are no senate districts. Also by removing the 17th you have just effectively made the senate gerrymanderable because the state legislatures elect them.
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Republic of Keshiland
Minister
 
Posts: 2164
Founded: Oct 21, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Republic of Keshiland » Mon Oct 23, 2017 2:03 pm

Thermodolia wrote:
Republic of Keshiland wrote:
That is the strategy. To do everything possible to make it implode even to the point where we are presidentless for over a year so that people will get to the point where they will ask for the ducking popular vote to end the ducking election and remove the EC.



Because it removes gerrymandering.

You do know that the senate can't be gerrymandered as there are no senate districts. Also by removing the 17th you have just effectively made the senate gerrymanderable because the state legislatures elect them.


I know I meant to have a pre 17th amendment situation for the representatives but with the governor, not the legislature appointing them.
I am pro-life, anti-gun, pro-immigration, pro UHC, pro-free college, pro universal income, anti-war, anti-death penalty, pro-financial ade, pro anything that makes children's lives better.

I finally realised how messed up English was when I read a sign in French and could comprehend half of it despite never learning any French

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 178103
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Mon Oct 23, 2017 2:03 pm

Valgora wrote:
Ifreann wrote:No amount of knowing about guns will stop someone from using a gun to kill themselves. Not having a gun, however, can stop someone from using a gun to kill themselves. And since being suicidal is not a permanent, inescapable condition, someone not being able to kill themselves immediately might never kill themselves at all.


Knowing how to use a gun lessens the chance for one to shoot themself. I said nothing about suicide.

How do you imagine that people usually use a gun to commit suicide? Self-inflicted blunt force trauma?

Besides you can kill yourself by:
- drinking bleach
- hanging yourself
- running in front of a fast moving vehicle
- jumping off a very tall object
- seppuku

You get the point?

Do you? All of those are either more likely to fail or more difficult to do than shooting oneself. And, as I said, if someone cannot kill themselves right away when they are feeling suicidal then they may not kill themselves at all.


Calixicanuss wrote:
Valgora wrote:
Actually, you do have grounds to do it.
However, the requires the process of creating a new amendment to repeal an old one. Which, if we're talking about guns, ain't gonna happen.


It sets a bad precedent, if one bill can be repealed, others will surely follow.

Democracy is flip flop-pity, one bad year and you can have drastic changes "look at the differences between U.S when Obama was president, and now the differences that we have trump"

One bad year can bring back all sorts of nasty things, as long as the person proposing them has enough charisma and memes.

The constitution protects us from shit like that, you start changing it, there is no shield.

The Constitution has provisions for amendments, which have been used several times. When, exactly, should we expect the whole thing to be repealed?


Telconi wrote:
Ifreann wrote:No amount of knowing about guns will stop someone from using a gun to kill themselves. Not having a gun, however, can stop someone from using a gun to kill themselves. And since being suicidal is not a permanent, inescapable condition, someone not being able to kill themselves immediately might never kill themselves at all.


But what about when having a gun stops a person from killing themselves?

I have no idea how that could happen.
He/Him
From damnation, immolation
He descends bringing our salvation
With heart of nuclear thunder
Iron will made of steel

Saoirse don Phalaistín

User avatar
Valgora
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6621
Founded: Mar 23, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Valgora » Mon Oct 23, 2017 2:04 pm

Republic of Keshiland wrote:
Greater Redosia wrote:

Keshiland ever heard of the economy, it's shouting your name. it's saying "The Economy would literally implode due to lack of tobacco and alcohol since they make up a pretty nice amount of employed people and amount of money being brought in.


Weed is more profitable then tobacco and alcohol its been proven in states where its legal


Well... you're not wrong.

But we shouldn't ban alcohol or tobacco.
Although, we could ban the usage of chemicals that are added to cigarettes.
Libertarian Syndicalist
Not state capitalist

MT+FanT+some PMT
Multi-species.
Current gov't:
Founded 2023
Currently 2027

DISREGARD NS STATS
Link to factbooks-Forum Factbook-Q&A-Embassy
The Reverend Tim
Ordained Dudeist Priest
IRL Me
Luxemburgist/Syndicalist, brony, metalhead
Valgora =+/-IRL views
8 Values

Pro - Socialism/communism, Palestine, space exploration, left libertarianism, BLM, Gun Rights, LGBTQ, Industrial Hemp
Anti - Trump, Hillary, capitalism, authoritarianism, Gun Control, Police, UN, electric cars, Automation of the workforce
Sometimes, I like to think of myself as the Commie version of Dale Gribble.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 178103
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Mon Oct 23, 2017 2:04 pm

Republic of Keshiland wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:You do know that the senate can't be gerrymandered as there are no senate districts. Also by removing the 17th you have just effectively made the senate gerrymanderable because the state legislatures elect them.


I know I meant to have a pre 17th amendment situation for the representatives but with the governor, not the legislature appointing them.

As entertaining as I'm sure your ideas on reforming American democracy are, they have nothing to do with gun control.
He/Him
From damnation, immolation
He descends bringing our salvation
With heart of nuclear thunder
Iron will made of steel

Saoirse don Phalaistín

User avatar
Sovaal
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13695
Founded: Mar 17, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Sovaal » Mon Oct 23, 2017 2:04 pm

Republic of Keshiland wrote:
Greater Redosia wrote:

Keshiland ever heard of the economy, it's shouting your name. it's saying "The Economy would literally implode due to lack of tobacco and alcohol since they make up a pretty nice amount of employed people and amount of money being brought in.


Weed is more profitable then tobacco and alcohol its been proven in states where its legal

So drunk drivers are bad, and alcohol needs to be banned, but weed is good, and high drivers are fine?
Most of the time I have no idea what the hell I'm doing or talking about.

”Many forms of government have been tried and will be tried in this world of sin and woe.
No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is
the worst form of government, except for all the others that have been tried from time to time." -
Winston Churchill, 1947.

"Rifles, muskets, long-bows and hand-grenades are inherently democratic weapons. A complex weapon makes the strong stronger, while a simple weapon – so long as there is no answer to it – gives claws to the weak.” - George Orwell

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 79496
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Thermodolia » Mon Oct 23, 2017 2:04 pm

Republic of Keshiland wrote:
Greater Redosia wrote:

Keshiland ever heard of the economy, it's shouting your name. it's saying "The Economy would literally implode due to lack of tobacco and alcohol since they make up a pretty nice amount of employed people and amount of money being brought in.


Weed is more profitable then tobacco and alcohol its been proven in states where its legal

And Philip Morris is just going to love you
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43682
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
New York Times Democracy

Postby Fartsniffage » Mon Oct 23, 2017 2:05 pm

Ifreann wrote:I have no idea how that could happen.


They run towards the police and the police do it for them. Same result but not a suicide. :)

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Camtropia, Dutch Socialist States, DutchFormosa, Eahland, Elejamie, Ireleand, KauviSzav Forever, Kurgao, Lollipop Torture Force, Maplegoyite, Narilamb, New Ziedrich, Pethia Eirenes, Sanana, Saorysa, Ulania

Advertisement

Remove ads