Ransium wrote:21st Century Egyptians wrote:Just because regions are old doesn't mean that they should be recognized by the security council. They should be adding things that create more substance for the game and move avenues of involvement for users that join.
You mean like having a 10+ year history of defending that is still ongoing, maintaining a very useful historical record database, having a weekly chat, and constant discussion about WA resolutions? I'd like to believe this is really not about gameplay, but I just don't see why this is the first or even the 50th resolution to be repealed.
Pointing out that BT was warned two weeks ago for what I believe the first time in his, what 12+ years playing the game also seems really unfair to me. We all have bad days.
The honest question that needs to be looked at is the activity over the ten years. I don't know most of it but I haven't even heard of them or had a clue who they were in the past year. Also I personally wouldn't define active as 3 times in the course of one month. So if someone could speak fairly on the actual activity of them it would be beneficial to help. Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't several of the stuff in the historical record database lost? I think I may have heard that somewhere it was. Also most regions have weekly chats and discussion about WA resolutions. In all honesty the discussion about Condemn Koth only the founder posting their thoughts and a big statement about how they viewed it with only around 2-3 (or a very small number) other people from that region discussing it. It could be discussed on discord or another off site chat i don't know. But in all honesty it didn't seem like much chat on the RMB now that you bring that up. In all honesty with today's standards I don't think it would have passed to be polite as possible. It's just most of the things on there were one nation that did so shouldn't be whole region getting it should have been that nation. Then the rest of the stuff on that list are average mundane things most regions have that aren't commended for. In all honesty an official warning and what looked like an unofficial warning since there was more after what they initially came for (correct me if I'm wrong the second) on the same day really shouldn't happen. There probably are users that have gone the whole game without getting warned so accepting the practice of getting warned is something that should be avoided especially when it involves taking time to type out a message and proof it and then deciding to hit submit. His post might be included in it but that is not the main focus of why this resolution is here. It is for the other things I mentioned above here.