to pulpy, not enough cellulose
Advertisement
by Ethel mermania » Sat Jul 22, 2017 5:18 pm
by USS Monitor » Sat Jul 22, 2017 5:19 pm
Hurdergaryp wrote:USS Monitor wrote:I remember it as being OK, but nothing special. But since it was 15 or 20 years ago, there's no telling how accurate that memory is, or even if the food they serve now is the same as the food they served back then.
Great progress has been made in the field of food technology. Did you know that it is totally legitimate in the States to use processed wood pulp as an ingredient in food products? It's true!
by The Holy Therns » Sat Jul 22, 2017 5:21 pm
The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord wrote:I hated this movie. I hated this movie. I hated this movie.
I've endured many bad films, whether they're "so bad it's good" (Such as 2000's Dungeons & Dragons, featuring Academy-Award Winner Jeremy Irons as an overacting archmage.), merely mediocre (Such as 2016's La La Land, featuring Emma Stone as a wannabe actress and Ryan Gosling as a smug piano-playing turnip.), or so fundamentally awful that they make you feel unbridled rage (Such as 2007's Taking Five, featuring two actresses that no one cares about playing utter psychopaths, and a boy band you've never heard of playing a boy band with no charisma that everyone loves for some reason.). This... cinematic thing, on the other hand, defies comprehension.
That thing is, of course, Spider-Man: Homecoming. A film which everyone else seems to like, but that makes me frustrated and angry beyond any reasonable measure.
It should have worked, the key word being should, but the film made me cringe from how terrible the end result was. Or, at least, the parts I saw. You see, I managed to endure the mental anguish of the film's first act. However, I eventually reached my breaking point; I couldn't endure any more of this abomination, and so I quietly walked out of the theater in a state of utter mental disgust. Unlike my normal reviews, where I summarize the film with a rating score, I won't do that. All I can say is... NO.
Verdict: Don't see this film. Don't let your friends or family see it, either.
In other words, how's everyone?
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜
Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.
by Ethel mermania » Sat Jul 22, 2017 5:21 pm
USS Monitor wrote:Hurdergaryp wrote:Great progress has been made in the field of food technology. Did you know that it is totally legitimate in the States to use processed wood pulp as an ingredient in food products? It's true!
I did know that. Stuff like that is probably why over-processed food doesn't keep you full like it should and I feel crappy if I eat it too much.
by The Holy Therns » Sat Jul 22, 2017 5:22 pm
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜
Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.
by Kannap » Sat Jul 22, 2017 5:25 pm
The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord wrote:I hated this movie. I hated this movie. I hated this movie.
I've endured many bad films, whether they're "so bad it's good" (Such as 2000's Dungeons & Dragons, featuring Academy-Award Winner Jeremy Irons as an overacting archmage.), merely mediocre (Such as 2016's La La Land, featuring Emma Stone as a wannabe actress and Ryan Gosling as a smug piano-playing turnip.), or so fundamentally awful that they make you feel unbridled rage (Such as 2007's Taking Five, featuring two actresses that no one cares about playing utter psychopaths, and a boy band you've never heard of playing a boy band with no charisma that everyone loves for some reason.). This... cinematic thing, on the other hand, defies comprehension.
That thing is, of course, Spider-Man: Homecoming. A film which everyone else seems to like, but that makes me frustrated and angry beyond any reasonable measure.
It should have worked, the key word being should, but the film made me cringe from how terrible the end result was. Or, at least, the parts I saw. You see, I managed to endure the mental anguish of the film's first act. However, I eventually reached my breaking point; I couldn't endure any more of this abomination, and so I quietly walked out of the theater in a state of utter mental disgust. Unlike my normal reviews, where I summarize the film with a rating score, I won't do that. All I can say is... NO.
Verdict: Don't see this film. Don't let your friends or family see it, either.
In other news, how's everyone?
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
by Ethel mermania » Sat Jul 22, 2017 5:26 pm
by The Holy Therns » Sat Jul 22, 2017 5:27 pm
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜
Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.
by The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord » Sat Jul 22, 2017 5:28 pm
The Holy Therns wrote:The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord wrote:I hated this movie. I hated this movie. I hated this movie.
I've endured many bad films, whether they're "so bad it's good" (Such as 2000's Dungeons & Dragons, featuring Academy-Award Winner Jeremy Irons as an overacting archmage.), merely mediocre (Such as 2016's La La Land, featuring Emma Stone as a wannabe actress and Ryan Gosling as a smug piano-playing turnip.), or so fundamentally awful that they make you feel unbridled rage (Such as 2007's Taking Five, featuring two actresses that no one cares about playing utter psychopaths, and a boy band you've never heard of playing a boy band with no charisma that everyone loves for some reason.). This... cinematic thing, on the other hand, defies comprehension.
That thing is, of course, Spider-Man: Homecoming. A film which everyone else seems to like, but that makes me frustrated and angry beyond any reasonable measure.
It should have worked, the key word being should, but the film made me cringe from how terrible the end result was. Or, at least, the parts I saw. You see, I managed to endure the mental anguish of the film's first act. However, I eventually reached my breaking point; I couldn't endure any more of this abomination, and so I quietly walked out of the theater in a state of utter mental disgust. Unlike my normal reviews, where I summarize the film with a rating score, I won't do that. All I can say is... NO.
Verdict: Don't see this film. Don't let your friends or family see it, either.
In other words, how's everyone?
Why?
by Hurdergaryp » Sat Jul 22, 2017 5:29 pm
USS Monitor wrote:Hurdergaryp wrote:Great progress has been made in the field of food technology. Did you know that it is totally legitimate in the States to use processed wood pulp as an ingredient in food products? It's true!
I did know that. Stuff like that is probably why over-processed food doesn't keep you full like it should and I feel crappy if I eat it too much.
by Ethel mermania » Sat Jul 22, 2017 5:29 pm
by Farnhamia » Sat Jul 22, 2017 5:30 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:USS Monitor wrote:
I did know that. Stuff like that is probably why over-processed food doesn't keep you full like it should and I feel crappy if I eat it too much.
a quick google turned up this gem
https://www.thestreet.com/story/1101291 ... -good.html
by Ethel mermania » Sat Jul 22, 2017 5:34 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:a quick google turned up this gem
https://www.thestreet.com/story/1101291 ... -good.html
Uhm, cellulose is a major component in all green plants.
by The Holy Therns » Sat Jul 22, 2017 5:36 pm
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜
Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.
by Ethel mermania » Sat Jul 22, 2017 5:37 pm
by USS Monitor » Sat Jul 22, 2017 5:40 pm
by Ethel mermania » Sat Jul 22, 2017 5:41 pm
by USS Monitor » Sat Jul 22, 2017 5:44 pm
by Ethel mermania » Sat Jul 22, 2017 5:46 pm
by USS Monitor » Sat Jul 22, 2017 5:50 pm
by Chrinthanium » Sat Jul 22, 2017 5:52 pm
by Kannap » Sat Jul 22, 2017 5:56 pm
The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord wrote:The Holy Therns wrote:
Why?
The pacing was off, the acting was cringe inducing, the writing wasn't good, the cinematography was... okay, I guess, the editing needed major improvements, the opening was somewhat confusing, about half of the characters were insufferable, the "humor" if you can call it that, wasn't funny, and the film was somehow worse than The Amazing Spider-Man 2.
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
by Hurdergaryp » Sat Jul 22, 2017 5:57 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:a quick google turned up this gem
https://www.thestreet.com/story/1101291 ... -good.html
Uhm, cellulose is a major component in all green plants.
by Kannap » Sat Jul 22, 2017 6:00 pm
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
by Hurdergaryp » Sat Jul 22, 2017 6:02 pm
Kannap wrote:The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord wrote:
The pacing was off, the acting was cringe inducing, the writing wasn't good, the cinematography was... okay, I guess, the editing needed major improvements, the opening was somewhat confusing, about half of the characters were insufferable, the "humor" if you can call it that, wasn't funny, and the film was somehow worse than The Amazing Spider-Man 2.
It was an amazing movie. Literally the best spiderman we've seen in film so far. Toby Mcguire's character trashed the spiderman concept and Andrew Garfield's character was a decent attempt to erase that.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhirisian Puppet Nation, Almighty Biden, Eahland, Google [Bot], Hidrandia, Jibjibistan, Neo-Hermitius, Pasong Tirad, Rusozak, Warzone Artevenia
Advertisement