Trump MAGAthread VII

[Greater Cesnica]

Nixon was at least intelligent. And tried to do some good things.

Nixon, at least, had a dog.

Boom. All the problems in the world vanished briefly, until Nixon resigned.

[Zanera]

The man he was insulting/threatening is the public relations professional, not Kasowitz.

Ah...that makes more sense.

I'm guessing PR guy might have been trying to give Kasowitz good advice, but was maybe too blunt. Or it was just a hater email.

[Galloism]

Ah...that makes more sense.

I'm guessing PR guy might have been trying to give Kasowitz good advice, but was maybe too blunt. Or it was just a hater email.

Or maybe he used his extensive skills for evil.

That's what the alt right will be saying by morning.

[Zanera]

I'm guessing PR guy might have been trying to give Kasowitz good advice, but was maybe too blunt. Or it was just a hater email.

Or maybe he used his extensive skills for evil.

That's what the alt right will be saying by morning.

...
I think I get what you mean.
I think it even makes sense.
I need to get my tinfoil hat and then go outside and demand stuff.
After I post on my Alt-Right blog about Queen Elizabeth being a part of the Illuminati.
She's too old to just know royal etiquette.

[Cannot think of a name]

meanwhile,privatized colonialism

[Corrian]

meanwhile,privatized colonialism

What the fuck?

[Washington Resistance Army]

meanwhile,privatized colonialism

I sense a business opportunity.

[The East Marches II]

meanwhile,privatized colonialism

If we should be so lucky as to be able to loot that God forsaken country. Far apart from actually moving the resources out of country. Instead we are there as the "good guys". It's sunk cost fallacy. Not worth our time.

[The East Marches II]

Trump lawyer: "Watch your back, bitch."

Marc Kasowitz, President Trump’s personal attorney on the Russia case, threatened a stranger in a string of profanity-laden emails Wednesday night.

The man, a retired public relations professional in the western United States who asked not to be identified, read ProPublica’s story this week on Kasowitz and sent the lawyer an email with the subject line: “Resign Now.’’

Kasowitz replied with series of angry messages sent between 9:30 p.m. and 10 p.m. Eastern time. One read: “I’m on you now. You are fucking with me now Let’s see who you are Watch your back , bitch.”

In another email, Kasowitz wrote: “Call me. Don’t be afraid, you piece of shit. Stand up. If you don’t call, you’re just afraid.” And later: “I already know where you live, I’m on you. You might as well call me. You will see me. I promise. Bro.”

I thought you were just kidding. As somebody else said, it's fps tier shit talk from a 12 year old.

[Camicon]

meanwhile,privatized colonialism

If we should be so lucky as to be able to loot that God forsaken country. Far apart from actually moving the resources out of country. Instead we are there as the "good guys". It's sunk cost fallacy. Not worth our time.

Because stealing the natural resources of the people you've been bombing for the better part of the last two decades is such an upstanding thing to do. And totally legal. Such a great idea. The best idea. Nobody knew it could be such a good idea.

[Corrian]

Trump Wants Border Wall “Transparency” So Drug Traffickers Don’t Hit Anyone Throwing Bags of Drugs Over

[Washington Resistance Army]

If we should be so lucky as to be able to loot that God forsaken country. Far apart from actually moving the resources out of country. Instead we are there as the "good guys". It's sunk cost fallacy. Not worth our time.

Because stealing the natural resources of the people you've been bombing for the better part of the last two decades is such an upstanding thing to do. And totally legal. Such a great idea. The best idea. Nobody knew it could be such a good idea.

>implying Uncle Sam cares about legalities

[Camicon]

Because stealing the natural resources of the people you've been bombing for the better part of the last two decades is such an upstanding thing to do. And totally legal. Such a great idea. The best idea. Nobody knew it could be such a good idea.

>implying Uncle Sam cares about legalities

>Implying the United States can run around flaunting international law like a streaker at a football game.

[The East Marches II]

If we should be so lucky as to be able to loot that God forsaken country. Far apart from actually moving the resources out of country. Instead we are there as the "good guys". It's sunk cost fallacy. Not worth our time.

Because stealing the natural resources of the people you've been bombing for the better part of the last two decades is such an upstanding thing to do. And totally legal. Such a great idea. The best idea. Nobody knew it could be such a good idea.

International law is a meme and not as if we paid it much attention under Obama anyway. They hate our guts for the most part in that country. What difference does it make if we loot it? That being said, it's not practical and the word of Erik Prince is not worth the paper it's written on. We should just walk away or put the worst warlord we can find in charge if stability is a concern.

[Washington Resistance Army]

>implying Uncle Sam cares about legalities

>Implying the United States can run around flaunting international law like a streaker at a football game.

Wouldn't be the first time we've done it, tbh.

[The East Marches II]

>implying Uncle Sam cares about legalities

>Implying the United States can run around flaunting international law like a streaker at a football game.

>implying we've not done that for the last 80 years

It's for weak countries to follow that nonsense.

[AiliailiA]

meanwhile,privatized colonialism

"Mattis 'listened politely' " then said no. Though I'd rather hear he laughed at them and threw them out.

[Kvatchdom]

I find it odd how modern Republicans and even Democrats make you miss right-wingers like Bush senior and Nixon.

[Camicon]

Because stealing the natural resources of the people you've been bombing for the better part of the last two decades is such an upstanding thing to do. And totally legal. Such a great idea. The best idea. Nobody knew it could be such a good idea.

International law is a meme and not as if we paid it much attention under Obama anyway. They hate our guts for the most part in that country. What difference does it make if we loot it? That being said, it's not practical and the word of Erik Prince is not worth the paper it's written on. We should just walk away or put the worst warlord we can find in charge if stability is a concern.

You realize that the US benefits greatly from following international law, yes? Refusing to recognize any authority or convention save for those they want to in the moment would hurt US interest at home and abroad.

If it was actually beneficial for the US to say "fuck it and this international law shit, we do what we want, when we want, and fuck anyone who tries to stop us", then they would be doing it.

>Implying the United States can run around flaunting international law like a streaker at a football game.

Wouldn't be the first time we've done it, tbh.

The US has bombed and plundered nations of their natural resources before? Why is this the first I'm hearing of this!?

>Implying the United States can run around flaunting international law like a streaker at a football game.

>implying we've not done that for the last 80 years

It's for weak countries to follow that nonsense.

It's for states that benefit from the status quo, and the USA is foremost among those states.

[The East Marches II]

International law is a meme and not as if we paid it much attention under Obama anyway. They hate our guts for the most part in that country. What difference does it make if we loot it? That being said, it's not practical and the word of Erik Prince is not worth the paper it's written on. We should just walk away or put the worst warlord we can find in charge if stability is a concern.

You realize that the US benefits greatly from following international law, yes? Refusing to recognize any authority or convention save for those they want to in the moment would hurt US interest at home and abroad.

If it was actually beneficial for the US to say "fuck it and this international law shit, we do what we want, when we want, and fuck anyone who tries to stop us", then they would be doing it.

We've already said and done that though. : /

Constitution is the highest law of the land anyway apart from our disregard of international law.

[The East Marches II]

Not to mention Camicon, weren't you trying to convince us earlier about what a just war Afghanistan was? What is this stuff about "bombing" as if we were the bad guys.

[Ism]

meanwhile,privatized colonialism

Yeah, colonizing Afghanistan, that'll end well. Hell, I don't even want to think about the positive affect on terrorist recruitment this sort of thing would cause.

[Minzerland II]

meanwhile,privatized colonialism

>Salon

[The East Marches II]

meanwhile,privatized colonialism

>Salon

It has a better link to the NYT embedded in it. Salon might be trash but there are other sources reporting it.

[Camicon]

You realize that the US benefits greatly from following international law, yes? Refusing to recognize any authority or convention save for those they want to in the moment would hurt US interest at home and abroad.

If it was actually beneficial for the US to say "fuck it and this international law shit, we do what we want, when we want, and fuck anyone who tries to stop us", then they would be doing it.

We've already said and done that though. : /

Constitution is the highest law of the land anyway apart from our disregard of international law.

The US doesn't disregard international law as it pertains to international relations, which is sort of the whole point of international law. It's creep into domestic policy is a more recent evolution, and quite secondary to it's primary function of regulating behaviour between states.

Not to mention Camicon, weren't you trying to convince us earlier about what a just war Afghanistan was? What is this stuff about "bombing" as if we were the bad guys.

Blowing up civilians with airstrikes certainly doesn't make you the good guys, regardless of whether or not the conflict on the whole is just.