by Benelux Federation » Wed Jun 28, 2017 5:25 am
by Grinning Dragon » Wed Jun 28, 2017 5:35 am
by Internationalist Bastard » Wed Jun 28, 2017 5:37 am
by Ifreann » Wed Jun 28, 2017 5:41 am
by The Blaatschapen » Wed Jun 28, 2017 5:42 am
by Costa Fierro » Wed Jun 28, 2017 5:43 am
Benelux Federation wrote:And that you in 2017 are married
by Dumb Ideologies » Wed Jun 28, 2017 5:44 am
by Internationalist Bastard » Wed Jun 28, 2017 5:45 am
by Costa Fierro » Wed Jun 28, 2017 5:46 am
Dumb Ideologies wrote:This vaguely reminds me vaguely of the plot of a quite weak TV drama we had over here that inexplicably ran for years despite apparently no-one ever watching it.
by Frank Zipper » Wed Jun 28, 2017 5:50 am
Dumb Ideologies wrote:This vaguely reminds me vaguely of the plot of a quite weak TV drama we had over here that inexplicably ran for years despite apparently no-one ever watching it.
by Pasong Tirad » Wed Jun 28, 2017 5:54 am
by Kannadrickenium » Wed Jun 28, 2017 5:57 am
by Goopig » Wed Jun 28, 2017 6:05 am
by Ifreann » Wed Jun 28, 2017 6:07 am
Goopig wrote:I suppose the real question is; if it's a given that it's cheating, who are you cheating on? Your own time stream is out of sync with the rest of the universe, so it's important to consider frame of reference. Your 2017 marriage is in the future relative to 1833, but the past relative to your own timeliness. Consequently, from your own perspective, you are cheating on 2017-wife, but from the global timeliness perspective you're cheating on 1833-wife
by Frank Zipper » Wed Jun 28, 2017 6:12 am
by Purpelia » Wed Jun 28, 2017 6:12 am
by Internationalist Bastard » Wed Jun 28, 2017 6:13 am
Ifreann wrote:Goopig wrote:I suppose the real question is; if it's a given that it's cheating, who are you cheating on? Your own time stream is out of sync with the rest of the universe, so it's important to consider frame of reference. Your 2017 marriage is in the future relative to 1833, but the past relative to your own timeliness. Consequently, from your own perspective, you are cheating on 2017-wife, but from the global timeliness perspective you're cheating on 1833-wife
I don't think that the space-time continuum cares about human romantic drama.
by Internationalist Bastard » Wed Jun 28, 2017 6:14 am
Purpelia wrote:The only thing that matters in regards to judging a persons behavior is the actual physical effects of that behavior. As in the end result. HOWEVER this is not just any behavior but behavior relating to romance and that's judged differently. In case of romance what matters is your personal continuity, as in what happened after what else for you. So yes, it's cheating and you would be a terribly person for doing so.
by Gallade » Wed Jun 28, 2017 6:18 am
by Ifreann » Wed Jun 28, 2017 6:22 am
Gallade wrote:The more pressing concern might be the first generation cholera and/or syphilis, moral quandaries aside maybe aim to go forward in time for some galactic space babes, instead.
by Gallade » Wed Jun 28, 2017 6:25 am
Ifreann wrote:Gallade wrote:The more pressing concern might be the first generation cholera and/or syphilis, moral quandaries aside maybe aim to go forward in time for some galactic space babes, instead.
That'd be cheating too. But on the plus side, future STDs might be digital and thus us fleshy-types would be immune.
by The Blaatschapen » Wed Jun 28, 2017 6:28 am
by Ifreann » Wed Jun 28, 2017 6:29 am
by The Blaatschapen » Wed Jun 28, 2017 6:48 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Dazchan, Ifreann, Likhinia, New Heldervinia, Shearoa
Advertisement