Advertisement
by Menassa » Thu Jun 22, 2017 10:57 pm
by Anere » Thu Jun 22, 2017 10:59 pm
by Luminesa » Thu Jun 22, 2017 11:04 pm
Menassa wrote:Does this mean that when Christians adopt Jewish practices they are violating international law?
by Khalisako » Thu Jun 22, 2017 11:21 pm
Menassa wrote:Does this mean that when Christians adopt Jewish practices they are violating international law?
Hurdergaryp wrote:Oh, Khalisako... my dear, precious little Khalisako...
sometimes I just want to grab you by the throat and choke you for a while,
but that would not be proper behaviour. It just wouldn't do.
by Menassa » Thu Jun 22, 2017 11:23 pm
by Khalisako » Thu Jun 22, 2017 11:24 pm
Hurdergaryp wrote:Oh, Khalisako... my dear, precious little Khalisako...
sometimes I just want to grab you by the throat and choke you for a while,
but that would not be proper behaviour. It just wouldn't do.
by Menassa » Thu Jun 22, 2017 11:35 pm
by Khalisako » Thu Jun 22, 2017 11:44 pm
Hurdergaryp wrote:Oh, Khalisako... my dear, precious little Khalisako...
sometimes I just want to grab you by the throat and choke you for a while,
but that would not be proper behaviour. It just wouldn't do.
by Greater United American Republics » Fri Jun 23, 2017 12:34 am
by Grenartia » Fri Jun 23, 2017 5:50 pm
by Auze » Fri Jun 23, 2017 5:59 pm
by Auze » Fri Jun 23, 2017 6:02 pm
by Sovaal » Fri Jun 23, 2017 6:06 pm
by Grenartia » Fri Jun 23, 2017 6:32 pm
Auze wrote:Grenartia wrote:
po·lit·i·cal cor·rect·ness
[pəˈlidəkəl kəˈrek(t)nəs]
NOUN
political correctitude (noun)
the avoidance, often considered as taken to extremes, of forms of expression or action that are perceived to exclude, marginalize, or insult groups of people who are socially disadvantaged or discriminated against.
Not really bad, unless it is extreme
by Sareva » Fri Jun 23, 2017 9:26 pm
Luminesa wrote:Salandriagado wrote:
To be specific: the Human Rights Council appointments are regional, and rotated among nations in that region. Saudi Arabia got the middle east one because... fuck, there aren't a whole lot of good options there to rotate between.
> Jordan raises its hand in the background.
Zanera wrote:Asteroids are terrorists. They support a Anarchist Rock agenda, and will attack any large rock bodies such as planets in order to scare the rest of the solar system, and will sometimes just threaten planets by going close to them as a sign saying," Anarchism rulez."
by Australian rePublic » Fri Jun 23, 2017 11:19 pm
by Harzberg » Fri Jun 23, 2017 11:53 pm
by The UCOA » Fri Jun 23, 2017 11:57 pm
Proctopeo wrote:You read the title right, folks: the UN is considering making "cultural appropriation" of indigenous cultural things illegal.. And an article with opposite slant for balance.
What do you think, NSG? Is this reasonable? Is it too authoritarian? Or is it just absurd?
In my personal opinion, this is 1) authoritarian and tyrannical, 2) absurd, and 3) dangerous. I do, however, think at least their heart is in their right place and this doesn't appear to be out of malice, but out of stupidity (t. Hanlon's Razor); essentially, their intentions are well, but their actions aren't.
Hope I did it right yall
by Zarnazia » Mon Jun 26, 2017 12:21 am
Menassa wrote:Does this mean that when Christians adopt Jewish practices they are violating international law?
by Zarnazia » Mon Jun 26, 2017 12:23 am
The UCOA wrote:Proctopeo wrote:You read the title right, folks: the UN is considering making "cultural appropriation" of indigenous cultural things illegal.. And an article with opposite slant for balance.
What do you think, NSG? Is this reasonable? Is it too authoritarian? Or is it just absurd?
In my personal opinion, this is 1) authoritarian and tyrannical, 2) absurd, and 3) dangerous. I do, however, think at least their heart is in their right place and this doesn't appear to be out of malice, but out of stupidity (t. Hanlon's Razor); essentially, their intentions are well, but their actions aren't.
Hope I did it right yall
defund them and remove the UN HQ from the USA
by Auze » Mon Jun 26, 2017 3:52 am
The UCOA wrote:Proctopeo wrote:You read the title right, folks: the UN is considering making "cultural appropriation" of indigenous cultural things illegal.. And an article with opposite slant for balance.
What do you think, NSG? Is this reasonable? Is it too authoritarian? Or is it just absurd?
In my personal opinion, this is 1) authoritarian and tyrannical, 2) absurd, and 3) dangerous. I do, however, think at least their heart is in their right place and this doesn't appear to be out of malice, but out of stupidity (t. Hanlon's Razor); essentially, their intentions are well, but their actions aren't.
Hope I did it right yall
defund them and remove the UN HQ from the USA
by Brokpastan » Tue Jun 27, 2017 2:06 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, ARIsyan-, Bienenhalde, Cerata, Dresderstan, Europa Undivided, Forsher, Hidrandia, Kerwa, Majestic-12 [Bot], New Temecula, New-Minneapolis, Ors Might, Pasong Tirad, Philjia, Port Carverton, Simonia, Statesburg, Stratonesia, Tarsonis, The Canadian Commonwelth, The Grand World Order, The Jamesian Republic, Uiiop
Advertisement