La Navasse wrote:<snip>
Why do you persist?
Advertisement
by Tim-Opolis » Sun Jun 04, 2017 11:57 am
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic
by Wallenburg » Sun Jun 04, 2017 2:39 pm
by Willania Imperium » Mon Jun 05, 2017 9:04 pm
by Tim-Opolis » Mon Jun 05, 2017 9:37 pm
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic
by The Atlae Isles » Mon Jun 05, 2017 9:46 pm
Tim-Opolis wrote:I'd like to thank TNP for the rough start with this
by Altmoras » Mon Jun 05, 2017 10:41 pm
The Atlae Isles wrote:Tim-Opolis wrote:I'd like to thank TNP for the rough start with this
I read their opinion, and it's because you were "crediting" the regions and bringing attention to them, and that the repeal could have been improved and taken a lot more time. "We're in no hurry," they seemed to say.
by Bhang Bhang Duc » Tue Jun 06, 2017 9:56 am
Shemiki wrote:I admit, I do wonder why this resolution is failing. It seems perfectly fine.
Pierconium wrote:I see Funk as an opportunistic manipulator that utilises the means available to him to reach his goals. In other words, a nation after my own heart.
RiderSyl wrote:If an enchantress made it so one raid could bring about world peace, Unibot would ask raiders to just sign a petition instead.
Sedgistan wrote:The SC has just has a spate of really shitty ones recently from Northumbria, his Watermelon fanboy…..
by McMannia Times Six » Tue Jun 06, 2017 10:26 am
Altmoras wrote:The Atlae Isles wrote:I read their opinion, and it's because you were "crediting" the regions and bringing attention to them, and that the repeal could have been improved and taken a lot more time. "We're in no hurry," they seemed to say.
Yeah I don't really agree with that line of thought. Naming Nazi Europa and HYDRA Command in this particular resolution serves to differentiate the fact that while they both are (or were in HYDRA's case) invader regions, they aren't exactly pals. What would you call them without names, "raiders, and other raiders"? "occupying invaders and fascists"?
I certainly agree with the merit of not advertising for invading powers, my resolution SC #210 never names the invading power at all. However for this particular resolution I think it has its uses.
On another note, I've heard some concerns about this resolution concerning the less than positive light in which it portrays La Navasse. Normally I might take exception to calling the author out in such a fashion, but La Navasse names himself multiple times in the original resolution so I see no reason why the repeal shouldn't at least address him.
by Benevolent Thomas » Tue Jun 06, 2017 11:06 am
McMannia Times Six wrote:
I take offence at that "were"
Ballotonia wrote:Personally, I think there's something seriously wrong with a game if it willfully allows the destruction of longtime player communities in favor of kids whose sole purpose is to enjoy ruining the game for others.
by The Normandian Empire » Tue Jun 06, 2017 11:08 am
Daily Interstellar: |The Normandian Military Armed Forces want you to join the military! Fight in the name of the Emperor and the Empire! Service guarantees citizenship! Are you doing your part?
by Consular » Tue Jun 06, 2017 5:03 pm
The Atlae Isles wrote:Tim-Opolis wrote:I'd like to thank TNP for the rough start with this
I read their opinion, and it's because you were "crediting" the regions and bringing attention to them, and that the repeal could have been improved and taken a lot more time. "We're in no hurry," they seemed to say.
by Check-o-slow-vakki-uh » Tue Jun 06, 2017 6:43 pm
by Tim-Opolis » Tue Jun 06, 2017 7:30 pm
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic
by Praetor00 » Tue Jun 06, 2017 8:49 pm
by The Boorah Tribe » Tue Jun 06, 2017 9:40 pm
by Altmoras » Tue Jun 06, 2017 11:18 pm
McMannia Times Six wrote:Altmoras wrote:
Yeah I don't really agree with that line of thought. Naming Nazi Europa and HYDRA Command in this particular resolution serves to differentiate the fact that while they both are (or were in HYDRA's case) invader regions, they aren't exactly pals. What would you call them without names, "raiders, and other raiders"? "occupying invaders and fascists"?
I certainly agree with the merit of not advertising for invading powers, my resolution SC #210 never names the invading power at all. However for this particular resolution I think it has its uses.
On another note, I've heard some concerns about this resolution concerning the less than positive light in which it portrays La Navasse. Normally I might take exception to calling the author out in such a fashion, but La Navasse names himself multiple times in the original resolution so I see no reason why the repeal shouldn't at least address him.
I take offence at that "were"
by Tim-Opolis » Wed Jun 07, 2017 1:40 am
Altmoras wrote:McMannia Times Six wrote:
I take offence at that "were"
A simple glance at the region page is enough to remember that HYDRA Command is a thing of the past.
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic
by Altmoras » Wed Jun 07, 2017 1:42 am
Tim-Opolis wrote:Altmoras wrote:
A simple glance at the region page is enough to remember that HYDRA Command is a thing of the past.
I would request you folks take discussion about a long-dead organization, outside of matters specifically related to its mention in the draft, to the Gameplay forum. Perhaps McMannia can find Hydra's thread somewhere around Page 20.
by McMannia Times Six » Wed Jun 07, 2017 3:15 am
Altmoras wrote:A simple glance at the region page is enough to remember that HYDRA Command is a thing of the past.
Tim-Opolis wrote:I would request you folks take discussion about a long-dead organization, outside of matters specifically related to its mention in the draft, to the Gameplay forum
by La Navasse » Wed Jun 07, 2017 4:26 pm
by Indo-Malaysia » Thu Jun 08, 2017 10:25 am
Check-o-slow-vakki-uh wrote:What I'm most confused about is why no one seems to be bothering to argue against this bill in this thread. Obviously people don't like it, but no one's putting forward arguments to explain why in the place where it would be most relevant.
by Abhichandra » Fri Jun 09, 2017 10:27 pm
"Repeal "Liberate Dank memes"" was defeated 9,265 votes to 5,098.
by Tim-Opolis » Sat Jun 10, 2017 2:36 pm
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement