by The Emerald Legion » Fri May 19, 2017 2:30 pm
by Thermodolia » Fri May 19, 2017 2:34 pm
by Sanctissima » Fri May 19, 2017 2:36 pm
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Fri May 19, 2017 2:42 pm
by The Emerald Legion » Fri May 19, 2017 2:49 pm
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:No.
If it was, it would be the stupidest plot in history.
After seeing massive damage to the cost, they would all agree drastic action must be taken and vote democrat after seeing irrefutable proof that Global Warming is real.
by Thermodolia » Fri May 19, 2017 2:52 pm
Sanctissima wrote:I... sincerely doubt that.
More than likely, it's because liberals latched onto the idea first, and if there's one thing Republicans love, it's screwing with liberals.
Get rid of all the hippie crap, sell the idea of nuclear and hydro energy being patriotic American industries that liberals would naturally hate, and you'd see the Republican Party suddenly become very amenable to the whole combating global warming thing.
by Galloism » Fri May 19, 2017 2:52 pm
by Paleocacher » Fri May 19, 2017 2:56 pm
by Galloism » Fri May 19, 2017 2:58 pm
Paleocacher wrote:There is no plot. I live in Los Angeles and I do not buy into the anthropogenic global warming hoax.
Not that humans aren't screwing up the planet: deforestation, overfishing, resource exploitation, pollution, acid rain, etc. I just don't think global warming is a manmade problem. There certainly isn't a damn thing we can do about it, unlike the other more pressing matters I mentioned.
by Sovaal » Fri May 19, 2017 3:01 pm
Thermodolia wrote:Sanctissima wrote:I... sincerely doubt that.
More than likely, it's because liberals latched onto the idea first, and if there's one thing Republicans love, it's screwing with liberals.
Get rid of all the hippie crap, sell the idea of nuclear and hydro energy being patriotic American industries that liberals would naturally hate, and you'd see the Republican Party suddenly become very amenable to the whole combating global warming thing.
Except that many liberals, myself included, love Nuclear power. It's only the stupid hippys that hate it
by Sovaal » Fri May 19, 2017 3:02 pm
Galloism wrote:There won't be "apocalyptic floodwaters" like a giant tsunami.
The sea will continue to rise and encroach gradually, which will eventually turn NYC into Venice and gradually eat other coastal cities. Those people won't vanish though - they'll move inland and keep voting.
This "plot" is silly.
by Thermodolia » Fri May 19, 2017 3:02 pm
by Sanctissima » Fri May 19, 2017 3:05 pm
Thermodolia wrote:Sanctissima wrote:I... sincerely doubt that.
More than likely, it's because liberals latched onto the idea first, and if there's one thing Republicans love, it's screwing with liberals.
Get rid of all the hippie crap, sell the idea of nuclear and hydro energy being patriotic American industries that liberals would naturally hate, and you'd see the Republican Party suddenly become very amenable to the whole combating global warming thing.
Except that many liberals, myself included, love Nuclear power. It's only the stupid hippys that hate it
by Sovaal » Fri May 19, 2017 3:06 pm
by Thermodolia » Fri May 19, 2017 3:07 pm
Sanctissima wrote:Thermodolia wrote:Except that many liberals, myself included, love Nuclear power. It's only the stupid hippys that hate it
I realize that, and to be frank am quite happy about it.
That being said, it's fairly clear which liberals, at least in America, are the ones affecting party policy on the matter. The obsession with wind and solar is disheartening.
by Sovaal » Fri May 19, 2017 3:08 pm
Sanctissima wrote:Thermodolia wrote:Except that many liberals, myself included, love Nuclear power. It's only the stupid hippys that hate it
I realize that, and to be frank am quite happy about it.
That being said, it's fairly clear which liberals, at least in America, are the ones affecting party policy on the matter. The obsession with wind and solar is disheartening.
by Sanctissima » Fri May 19, 2017 3:11 pm
Thermodolia wrote:Sanctissima wrote:
I realize that, and to be frank am quite happy about it.
That being said, it's fairly clear which liberals, at least in America, are the ones affecting party policy on the matter. The obsession with wind and solar is disheartening.
Wind and solar can work. It's just that they can't be the base power. Nuclear can be the base power and the wind and solar can make up the rest if we need more power. As those types of power are more flexible unlike nuclear
by Multiversal Venn-Copard » Fri May 19, 2017 3:11 pm
by Grand Britannia » Fri May 19, 2017 3:13 pm
by Longweather » Fri May 19, 2017 3:27 pm
Sovaal wrote:Galloism wrote:There won't be "apocalyptic floodwaters" like a giant tsunami.
The sea will continue to rise and encroach gradually, which will eventually turn NYC into Venice and gradually eat other coastal cities. Those people won't vanish though - they'll move inland and keep voting.
This "plot" is silly.
We'll just build a wall around the coastal cities, and make them pay for it
by Sovaal » Fri May 19, 2017 3:29 pm
by Donut section » Fri May 19, 2017 3:30 pm
by Pope Joan » Fri May 19, 2017 6:19 pm
by Bassoe » Fri May 19, 2017 6:49 pm
by Jamzmania » Fri May 19, 2017 7:19 pm
The Alexanderians wrote:"Fear no man or woman,
No matter what their size.
Call upon me,
And I will equalize."
-Engraved on the side of my M1911 .45
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ethel mermania, Google [Bot], Hidrandia, Kannap, Kreushia, Plan Neonie, Ravemath, Sarolandia, Tungstan
Advertisement