Vaculatestar64 wrote:I assume you failed to see the joint statement made by multiple regions, including KoGB.
Just to note Vac, your statement came out 2 days after Ikania posted that
Advertisement
by Drop Your Pants » Thu Apr 13, 2017 12:01 pm
Vaculatestar64 wrote:I assume you failed to see the joint statement made by multiple regions, including KoGB.
by Ikania » Fri Apr 14, 2017 12:01 pm
Vaculatestar64 wrote:Ikania wrote:HAHAHAHAHA you forget the fact that Yuno switching would make defending awesome in its own right and take away the only thing that made raiding worthwhile <3
And it is about raiding in general, it's on every organization that cooperates with and tolerates the Invaders instead of shutting them out like they deserve. A reflection upon your own standards and ethics. Which is also why I like TBH c:
I assume you failed to see the joint statement made by multiple regions, including KoGB. Raiders who will work with TI are now in the extreme minority. So no it isn't on raiderdom. The minority do not represent the values of the majority. So please get somewhere with your generalizations, or if not, I assume a few could be made about defenders based off of some of its membership, both present and past. A certain Chief of the Band comes to mind.
by Ever-Wandering Souls » Sun Apr 16, 2017 10:05 am
The Alicorns (Equestria) wrote:Let them stay, no need to badmouth them...From our view a bunch of nations just came in, seized the delegate position, and changed a few superficial things...we play NationStates differently...there's really no reason for us to be butthurt.
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8944227
http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=8951258
Reploid Productions wrote:Raiders are endlessly creative
by Kitzerland » Sun Apr 16, 2017 10:54 am
Ever-Wandering Souls wrote:TBH has made every effort to continue to respect you as we do every other raiding region on the battlefield
by Ikania » Sun Apr 16, 2017 12:10 pm
by Consular » Sun Apr 16, 2017 10:36 pm
by RiderSyl » Mon Apr 17, 2017 5:34 am
Consular wrote:They're tags. Why does it matter if you get tagged over.
by Big Bad Badger » Mon Apr 17, 2017 8:35 am
by General Knot » Mon Apr 17, 2017 8:35 am
by Consular » Mon Apr 17, 2017 9:16 am
Ridersyl wrote:Kitzerland wrote:Why?Consular wrote:They're tags. Why does it matter if you get tagged over.
Gonna answer both of these in one go.
Raiders are to respect other raiders' operations, from tags to occupations. That was the original meaning behind 'Raider Unity', before it got turned into a nonsense phrase.
The proponents of actual Raider Unity are mostly gone now, but I'm not surprised to see TBH still upholding it, nor am I surprised to see TI not giving a shit about it.
The Highlander 1 wrote:Quote me: There is no Raider Unity!
by Roavin » Mon Apr 17, 2017 10:51 am
General Knot wrote:Ridersyl wrote:Raiders are to respect other raiders' operations, from tags to occupations. That was the original meaning behind 'Raider Unity', before it got turned into a nonsense phrase.
People acting like they know what they're talking about when they don't is a pet peeve of mine.
by Kitzerland » Mon Apr 17, 2017 10:56 am
by General Knot » Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:21 am
by Roavin » Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:51 am
General Knot wrote:There is no "Raider Unity".
T E Lawrence wrote:There is no Raider Unity, dear little offender.
General Knot wrote:There is no "Raider Unity." Perhaps there once was when its original concept was well-known, but the phrase has since been assimilated by all "raiders" to justify their every motive and action. Ultimately, all regions and organizations have their own conflicting interests and only care about such.
by Gibraltarica » Mon Apr 17, 2017 12:16 pm
by The Highlander 1 » Mon Apr 17, 2017 3:19 pm
by The Highlander 1 » Mon Apr 17, 2017 3:21 pm
by RiderSyl » Mon Apr 17, 2017 4:24 pm
General Knot wrote:Ridersyl wrote:Raiders are to respect other raiders' operations, from tags to occupations. That was the original meaning behind 'Raider Unity', before it got turned into a nonsense phrase.
People acting like they know what they're talking about when they don't is a pet peeve of mine.
by General Knot » Mon Apr 17, 2017 6:29 pm
Roavin wrote:General Knot wrote:A few clicks on your part will give way to countless posts by H and I on the subject.
Well, let's take a look.General Knot wrote:There is no "Raider Unity".T E Lawrence wrote:There is no Raider Unity, dear little offender.General Knot wrote:There is no "Raider Unity." Perhaps there once was when its original concept was well-known, but the phrase has since been assimilated by all "raiders" to justify their every motive and action. Ultimately, all regions and organizations have their own conflicting interests and only care about such.
Wow I'm so enlightened.
"Respecting other raiders", however, is a misconstrued application of the now-defunct "Raider Unity". Nowhere does it ever state that all raiders, in fear of interregional backlash, should respect all raiders' "turf". Furthermore, "Raider Unity" was never an exclusive club that you could join by following a set of rules. It was a fluid concept that varied between every individual and every organization, because each and every individual and organization had their own practices and agendas. Just because you won't touch Raider A's occupation doesn't mean I won't, because I may not regard Raider A as a part of my "Raider Unity". Such a misunderstanding can only be compared to the defender response to the invasion of California: "the late founder of the region was associated with invaders, so why are you disrespecting Raider Unity by invading the region!"
by Cormactopia Prime » Mon Apr 17, 2017 6:43 pm
The Highlander 1 wrote:Rather than complain about we Ancients stating that there is no Raider Unity, I challenge anyone to show any extended period of time over the past 13 years where Raider Unity prevailed.
Enlighten me, please.
by Tinhampton » Sat May 06, 2017 5:53 pm
by Tim-Opolis » Sat May 06, 2017 10:38 pm
Tinhampton wrote:Are these people still around?
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement