Advertisement
by Redsection » Sun Apr 02, 2017 7:01 pm
by NeuPolska » Sun Apr 02, 2017 7:04 pm
Kar-Esseria wrote:Who is that and are they female because if not then they can go make love to their hand.
Impaled Nazarene wrote:Go home Polska wins NS.
United Mongol Hordes wrote:Polska isn't exactly the nicest guy in the world
Impaled Nazarene wrote:Hurd you miss the point more than Polska misses Poland.
Rhodesialund wrote:when you have Charlie ten feet away or something operating operationally.
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:Gayla is living in 1985 but these guys are already in 1916
by Soyouso » Sun Apr 02, 2017 7:06 pm
NeuPolska wrote:Soyouso wrote:I am a fascist, and because I prefer authoritarian leadership I wouldn't mind a monarch, as it is one of the leader types that could fit fascist criteria. Granted they and any heirs are trained thoroughly and are competent enough. So I support it, but I am not strictly a monarchist per say.
Yes, to answer the OP. If a movement of monarchists got big enough, you could make Europe monarchist again, But you guys have many enemies, many people who want to fight you guys. So if you want monarchy in Europe again, all types of monarchists would have to put their differences aside and start a movement. Before you fight each other you should at least get a foundation, mm? And there is my advice.
An alliance between us monarchists and you fascists would be temporary, I can assure you of that.
But if it can bring our monarchs back, it's a necessary evil.
by NeuPolska » Sun Apr 02, 2017 7:17 pm
Soyouso wrote:Indeed. Listen, us fascists seek to bring back the glory of our nation, give our people a reason to be proud, and enforce a stable system worth being nationalist over. It is possible for a monarch to be fascist if the choosing of the heirs is based on their merit.
I'd personally prefer a flat out dictator, but an absolute or at the very least authoritarian monarch is also fine by me. But we can all agree, no matter what type we want, that modern day leadership is not stable enough, and needs a better system, hm? I do believe it'd be better for Europe. I am (US) American, but the Europeans deserve better than the shite they have to deal with nowadays.
Kar-Esseria wrote:Who is that and are they female because if not then they can go make love to their hand.
Impaled Nazarene wrote:Go home Polska wins NS.
United Mongol Hordes wrote:Polska isn't exactly the nicest guy in the world
Impaled Nazarene wrote:Hurd you miss the point more than Polska misses Poland.
Rhodesialund wrote:when you have Charlie ten feet away or something operating operationally.
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:Gayla is living in 1985 but these guys are already in 1916
by Soyouso » Sun Apr 02, 2017 7:30 pm
NeuPolska wrote:Soyouso wrote:Indeed. Listen, us fascists seek to bring back the glory of our nation, give our people a reason to be proud, and enforce a stable system worth being nationalist over. It is possible for a monarch to be fascist if the choosing of the heirs is based on their merit.
I'd personally prefer a flat out dictator, but an absolute or at the very least authoritarian monarch is also fine by me. But we can all agree, no matter what type we want, that modern day leadership is not stable enough, and needs a better system, hm? I do believe it'd be better for Europe. I am (US) American, but the Europeans deserve better than the shite they have to deal with nowadays.
That's all great, but fascism typically accomplishes that through militarism and authoritarianism. Monarchs, even absolute ones, don't necessarily have the same level of control as dictators. Dictators, at least first-generation ones, screw with a fundamental part of monarchy as well: he who doesn't seek power should rule. Dictators not only want power, but seek to keep it through their strong military and propaganda, as well as control over the media.
But yes, we can agree that modern leadership is not stable. Europe is run by corrupt kurwas that don't understand their people. They are not being accurately represented. I myself am a European expat (take a wild guess where I'm from), and most probable heir of two sizable properties.
by Secundus Imperium Romanum » Tue Apr 04, 2017 4:09 pm
by The Princes of the Universe » Fri Apr 07, 2017 12:48 pm
NeuPolska wrote:An alliance between us monarchists and you fascists would be temporary, I can assure you of that.
But if it can bring our monarchs back, it's a necessary evil.
by Escocaria » Fri Apr 07, 2017 12:54 pm
Pro-Union Anglo-ScotSultana Annette II Al Yusuf - Escocarian Political Parties - NS Stats are to be ignored
by The Princes of the Universe » Fri Apr 07, 2017 1:08 pm
by Old Tyrannia » Fri Apr 07, 2017 1:18 pm
Escocaria wrote:I'm a UK-Style Constitutional monarchy...if the monarch had more power and was actively involved in politics. The aristocracy also still exists but is mostly uninvolved in politics aside from doing their duty as citizens of the Empire. The government itself is also slightly more militaristic due to cultural differences but is still mostly similar to the UK model.
by Escocaria » Fri Apr 07, 2017 1:23 pm
Old Tyrannia wrote:Escocaria wrote:I'm a UK-Style Constitutional monarchy...if the monarch had more power and was actively involved in politics. The aristocracy also still exists but is mostly uninvolved in politics aside from doing their duty as citizens of the Empire. The government itself is also slightly more militaristic due to cultural differences but is still mostly similar to the UK model.
General is an OOC forum.
Pro-Union Anglo-ScotSultana Annette II Al Yusuf - Escocarian Political Parties - NS Stats are to be ignored
by Salus Maior » Fri Apr 07, 2017 3:21 pm
NeuPolska wrote: I myself am a European expat (take a wild guess where I'm from), and most probable heir of two sizable properties.
by Salus Maior » Fri Apr 07, 2017 3:22 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Alvecia, Atrito, Eahland, East Leaf Republic, Emotional Support Crocodile, Ifreann, Oronatia, Pasong Tirad, Sublime Ottoman State 1800 RP, The Xenopolis Confederation
Advertisement