]Two and a half minutes of buffering later she continues, “Our internet is the slowest in Regionless.
Advertisement
by Australian rePublic » Tue Mar 28, 2017 4:45 am
]Two and a half minutes of buffering later she continues, “Our internet is the slowest in Regionless.
by Candlewhisper Archive » Wed Mar 29, 2017 3:34 am
“Our internet is the slowest in @@REGION@@. Our system needs a massive overhaul. We need to crank it up!
by Australian rePublic » Wed Mar 29, 2017 4:20 am
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:I strongly disagree. Look past that sentence:“Our internet is the slowest in @@REGION@@. Our system needs a massive overhaul. We need to crank it up!
That exclamation mark serves for the previously two sentences too, as this is clearly laid out as: "Statement. Statement. Exclamation!"
by Candlewhisper Archive » Wed Mar 29, 2017 5:23 am
by Australian rePublic » Wed Mar 29, 2017 5:33 am
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:A shitty author who has been published 4 times, and is one of the most active and helpful people on this forum, you mean?
Naa, you're good, Aussie, keep doing your thing.
by Australian rePublic » Wed Mar 29, 2017 5:44 am
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:A shitty author who has been published 4 times, and is one of the most active and helpful people on this forum, you mean?
Naa, you're good, Aussie, keep doing your thing.
by Candlewhisper Archive » Wed Mar 29, 2017 7:16 am
Australian Republic wrote:Candlewhisper Archive wrote:A shitty author who has been published 4 times, and is one of the most active and helpful people on this forum, you mean?
Naa, you're good, Aussie, keep doing your thing.
But on the flip side, it's only 4 issues, out of how many I've submitted? This is why I like to work with percentages. It gives you a more realistic figure
by Australian rePublic » Thu Mar 30, 2017 3:57 am
Candlewhisper Archive wrote:Australian Republic wrote:But on the flip side, it's only 4 issues, out of how many I've submitted? This is why I like to work with percentages. It gives you a more realistic figure
Eh, it's not far off my percentage, and it's a pretty high score for a non-editor.
Not wanting you to get too big headed here of course - honestly, you're never going to be the right sort of issue-creator to join the editorial team, but you're a solid ideas-man, which is why you've gotten published multiple times.
Anyway, let's get this thread back on track.
by Candlewhisper Archive » Thu Mar 30, 2017 4:38 am
Australian Republic wrote:Thanks for the compliment. Let's get back on track!
Issue 001"
: Are we allowed to call it "60 minutes"? Does that not violate copyright?
by Australian rePublic » Fri Mar 31, 2017 3:03 am
by Candlewhisper Archive » Fri Mar 31, 2017 4:24 am
Australian Republic wrote:I see...
Though Nike isn't really fair. Max could argue he's refering to Nike, the Greek goddess of victory, who is the name sake of the clothing company
by Marshian nation36 » Fri Mar 31, 2017 5:04 am
Frisbeeteria wrote:Christian Democrats wrote:no one ever addressed this concern:
No one addressed either concern because those names are not in the issues themselves. In both cases, you had an unlucky draw on the @@RANDOMNAME@@ table. It's quite possible no one else in the game ever saw that combination in that place, nor ever will again.
I'm not guessing, by the way - I just looked them both up.
by Candlewhisper Archive » Fri Mar 31, 2017 7:32 am
Marshian nation36 wrote:I have someone lying, because they won't tell me the truth.
by Trotterdam » Sat Apr 01, 2017 4:59 pm
by Eris I Dysnomia » Sun Apr 02, 2017 3:53 pm
“As usual, science has the answer!” claims renowned engineer and futurist, Dr. Leia Cruise. “You’re probably aware that there have been numerous developments in unmanned aerial vehicles over the past several years. Well, my laboratory’s been developing this compact flying courier robot with VTOL and GPS and a bunch of other initialisms
by Luna Amore » Sun Apr 02, 2017 4:06 pm
Eris I Dysnomia wrote:Issue 302:“As usual, science has the answer!” claims renowned engineer and futurist, Dr. Leia Cruise. “You’re probably aware that there have been numerous developments in unmanned aerial vehicles over the past several years. Well, my laboratory’s been developing this compact flying courier robot with VTOL and GPS and a bunch of other initialisms
The appropriate word is "acronyms". And if you're going to make an acronym joke, you might as well shorten "unmanned aerial vehicles" to "UAVs"
by The Free Joy State » Mon Apr 03, 2017 3:59 am
Trotterdam wrote:#707:
New effect lines, "@@DEMONYMNOUNPLURAL@@ are unrivalled in obstacle courses", "citizens buy season tickets on a 20-year payment plan", "unfit police officers collapse while trying to capture unusually athletic criminals", and "walking to the local pizza parlour earns a lovely sports participation ribbon" have a space at the beginning.
Also, you're using the wrong demonym. (Can't you set an automated checker to reject issues with @@DEMONYMADJECTIVEPLURAL@@? It's never correct.)
Meanwhile, in the issue text, "@@NAME@@ @@ANIMALPLURAL@@" (the sports team name) should probably be "@@DEMONYMADJECTIVE@@ @@ANIMALPLURAL@@". Also, make sure you're capitalizing every word in @@ANIMALPLURAL@@ - I don't actually know if you're not, but I thought I'd preempt it
"Cribbage, Monopoly, and Backgammon", "man, woman, and child" need an extra comma.
by Bears Armed » Mon Apr 03, 2017 4:36 am
Luna Amore wrote:It looks like those words have overlapping definitions, but initialisms seems more appropriate as you pronounce those two (VTOL and GPS) each letter at a time. Although I guess it depends on who you ask as to how to pronounce VTOL.
by Big Brain City » Mon Apr 03, 2017 8:59 am
“Replacing the pipes would be so expensive, Dear The Big Brain. Fortunately, we can provide for the water needs of the whole State.” asserts Debra Merkel, Manager of The Glorious Big Brain City Water Bottling Plant, as she pours some of Mother Big Brain City’s slightly-cloudy product into a shot-glass. “With increased funding for advertisements, we will teach that all good Brainishes have a duty to buy our pricey...reasonable product, as sparking as a mountain stream.” Wincing slightly, she takes a sip from her glass.
Brainishes
Brainishpeople
The Big Brain wrote:Freedom? People are fools and unworthy of much freedom. Even I am a fool. Many people have recognized that and want me to suffer for it.
Unfortunately for them, I can glass their planets.
by Tinhampton » Mon Apr 03, 2017 3:44 pm
by Varda I Ilmare » Mon Apr 03, 2017 4:02 pm
by Trotterdam » Mon Apr 03, 2017 4:39 pm
If it's meant to be reminiscent of those examples, wouldn't @@CAPITAL@@ @@ANIMALPLURAL@@ be better?The Free Joy State wrote:- @@NAME@@ @@ANIMALPLURAL@@ is deliberate: in the style of the Miami Dolphins, or the Detroit Lions and similar.
I don't remember the nation name, but I saw it in a nation that had an adjective of "Council" and a noun of "Councillor". The effect line incorrectly used "Councils".The Free Joy State wrote:- The demonym seemed correct in test-runs, but I'll take another look
Revoking the field is just cosmetic, you still count as having unlocked it for the purpose of issues (as also evidenced by the fact that you can reenter a new value at any time, rather than needing to re-unlock it with the original unlocking issue).Tinhampton wrote:But if I've revoked my national faith, then surely I'd be ineligible to recieve an issue that states I have a national faith?
by A Humanist Prognostication » Mon Apr 03, 2017 5:35 pm
Trotterdam wrote:Note that #070 was actually added into the game long before the custom fields existed, so unless it was reworked since then, it probably assumed you had a national religion regardless. Imagine it as an "unofficial official religion" that everyone associates your nation with even though the government never said so (like Christianity in the US...), and the narrative works.
Trotterdam wrote:Also, [violet] was kind of grumpy about implementing this feature in the first place, so maybe we shouldn't nitpick too much
by The Free Joy State » Mon Apr 03, 2017 9:41 pm
I don't remember the nation name, but I saw it in a nation that had an adjective of "Council" and a noun of "Councillor". The effect line incorrectly used "Councils".The Free Joy State wrote:- The demonym seemed correct in test-runs, but I'll take another look
by Aibohphobia » Tue Apr 04, 2017 12:22 am
"sparkling"?sparking as a mountain stream
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: No registered users
Advertisement