Advertisement
by Puzikas » Mon Mar 20, 2017 8:25 am
Sevvania wrote:I don't post much, but I am always here.
Usually waiting for Puz ;-;
by Laritaia » Mon Mar 20, 2017 8:26 am
Theodosiya wrote:SO, for foreseeable future, we'll use M16s, AK-12s, HK 416s?
by Purpelia » Mon Mar 20, 2017 8:41 am
Kazarogkai wrote:Depends on what you mean by "man-portable". I can see some type of Bazooka sized shoulder fired laser cannon for AT purposes in maybe a couple decades.
by Gallan Systems » Mon Mar 20, 2017 8:50 am
by Austrasien » Mon Mar 20, 2017 8:51 am
Kazarogkai wrote:Helps logistics not having to make and then drag in cartfuls of material from a far away place to another far away place now you can resupply on the battlefield itself.
by Theodosiya » Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:02 am
by Theodosiya » Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:06 am
by The Archangel Conglomerate » Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:19 am
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:For want of lances, the heavy equipment never reached the field.
For want of heavy equipment the platoons FOs could direct no HMGs.
For want of HMGs, the Archians had to rely on shitty fucking microcalibers.
For want of real weapons, they lost the war.
by The Archangel Conglomerate » Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:53 am
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:For want of lances, the heavy equipment never reached the field.
For want of heavy equipment the platoons FOs could direct no HMGs.
For want of HMGs, the Archians had to rely on shitty fucking microcalibers.
For want of real weapons, they lost the war.
by Taihei Tengoku » Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:00 am
Puzikas wrote:M4A1s, AK-74M2s, H&K 416A5s, QBZ-95, AKMs, and various special purpose rifles
AK-12 is a meme that will never happen and is already dead
Much to Gallas Chagrin the M4 steady marches on in the only Western state that matters anymore
He&K will shill it's rifle until it can no longer draw breath
China rifle will stay where it is
And AKMs will be in use until the end of ends
E: however if Russia chooses to adopt the A545 I will be rather pleased as it represents and advantage in basically every way over the existing Kalashnikov systems and will be one of the few major advances (an actual recoil mitigation system built into the weapon) in small arms since 1967
by The Archangel Conglomerate » Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:01 am
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:For want of lances, the heavy equipment never reached the field.
For want of heavy equipment the platoons FOs could direct no HMGs.
For want of HMGs, the Archians had to rely on shitty fucking microcalibers.
For want of real weapons, they lost the war.
by Kazarogkai » Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:26 am
by Federated Kingdom of Prussia » Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:30 am
by Puzikas » Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:36 am
Taihei Tengoku wrote:Puzikas wrote:M4A1s, AK-74M2s, H&K 416A5s, QBZ-95, AKMs, and various special purpose rifles
AK-12 is a meme that will never happen and is already dead
Much to Gallas Chagrin the M4 steady marches on in the only Western state that matters anymore
He&K will shill it's rifle until it can no longer draw breath
China rifle will stay where it is
And AKMs will be in use until the end of ends
E: however if Russia chooses to adopt the A545 I will be rather pleased as it represents and advantage in basically every way over the existing Kalashnikov systems and will be one of the few major advances (an actual recoil mitigation system built into the weapon) in small arms since 1967
Latest rumors are that the Russians are doing both AK-12 and A545?
The Archangel Conglomerate wrote:potential terminal effectiveness
Kazarogkai wrote:It seems that the standards were just a bit too high honestly
Sevvania wrote:I don't post much, but I am always here.
Usually waiting for Puz ;-;
by Gallan Systems » Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:37 am
Kazarogkai wrote:"Although the Steyr design proved effective, as did most of the weapons submitted, the entire ACR program ended with none of the entrants achieving performance 100% better than the M16A2, the baseline for a successful ACR weapon."
It seems that the standards were just a bit too high honestly. Not exactly fair nor reasonable but whatever. Also from what I remember, weren't the guns that used these things rifled not smooth bored?
by Purpelia » Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:39 am
Federated Kingdom of Prussia wrote:In the Napoleonic Wars and Seven Years' War, how many volleys between regular infantry formations were exchanged before one or both sides charged? From my readings, massed bayonet fights between two large infantry formations almost never happened, although small-scale bayonet fights were relatively common. I've also heard that infantry in the US Civil War suffered higher casualty rates than European observers were used to, because both sides often stood off and kept shooting, without ever resorting to the bayonet.
by The Archangel Conglomerate » Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:50 am
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:For want of lances, the heavy equipment never reached the field.
For want of heavy equipment the platoons FOs could direct no HMGs.
For want of HMGs, the Archians had to rely on shitty fucking microcalibers.
For want of real weapons, they lost the war.
by Theodosiya » Mon Mar 20, 2017 10:51 am
by Puzikas » Mon Mar 20, 2017 11:02 am
The Archangel Conglomerate wrote:u r just mad that fishhook kills harder than spinny 545 trash
Gallan Systems wrote:It's the difference between 3/10 and 6/10 hits on a target range.
Sevvania wrote:I don't post much, but I am always here.
Usually waiting for Puz ;-;
by Theodosiya » Mon Mar 20, 2017 11:08 am
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: HarYan
Advertisement