Pierconium wrote:At what point did Lazarus become a signatory region of the Accords?
Because it seems that some people are claiming that since those regions within the Accords aren't actively enforcing the Accords in regards to a non-signatory region then the treaty is invalid.
What kind of screwy maths are you working at there?
No one is saying the Accords signatories should have acted, as the South Pacific did, to defend Lazarus against The Black Hawks. I would argue that it doesn't require a treaty for a Feeder or Sinker to defend one of its sister regions, but that is beside the point.
The point is, simply, this: If the signatories of the GCR Sovereignty Accords will not, at minimum, disavow military forces that have just perpetrated a hostile invasion against one of their sister regions now, what basis of trust can possibly exist for any other Feeders or Sinkers to join a defense pact with you later? This "single-update prank," as The Black Hawks are calling it, was an unintentional test of whether the GCR Sovereignty Accords signatories could be trusted to uphold the sovereignty of their fellow Feeders and Sinkers. Thus far, the Queen of Balder has abysmally flunked the test, and the clock is ticking on how the rest of you will handle it, and whether the government of Balder will do anything to correct their monarch's misstep.