NATION

PASSWORD

"Men Must Approve Abortion, Women Are Hosts"

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
New Larthinia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 637
Founded: Oct 06, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby New Larthinia » Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:34 am

Alvecia wrote:
New Larthinia wrote:Ok, now that I did actually read the law the entire debate is centered around, I don't really see anything wrong with it. That's some weird wording, but that doesn't change the intent of the law.

In law, wording is key.


Except this isn't a law, this is a statement regarding a possible law.
New Larthinia - spacial superpower, futuristic dictatorship, leaders of The Larthinian Phalanx. As our influence reaches for you across the Omniverse, you will have to make a choice everyone makes: join us or face us

We use factbooks, not NS stats
Proud member of The Anti Democracy League

User avatar
Harkback Union
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17499
Founded: Sep 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Harkback Union » Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:35 am

Alvecia wrote:
Harkback Union wrote:
I'm sure its a no-brainer. Just put the baby in a warm, cosy tank and link his blood network with that of his father through a glass tube. The father can carry the tank on his back. The only reason it wasn't done yet is lack of demand.

I'm no biologist, or engineer, but I suspect it is far more complicated than that or we'll have done it already.


I'm surprised we haven't done it already.

We can already keep people alive with artificial organs. Fetus are just little people.

User avatar
The of Japan
Minister
 
Posts: 2781
Founded: Jul 30, 2016
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The of Japan » Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:35 am

The fetus is inside a woman's body, not her body
Last edited by The of Japan on Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:39 am, edited 2 times in total.
Pony, Texan, & Internationalist

User avatar
Alvecia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20487
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:36 am

Harkback Union wrote:
Alvecia wrote:I'm no biologist, or engineer, but I suspect it is far more complicated than that or we'll have done it already.


I'm surprised we haven't done it already.

We can already keep people alive with artificial organs. Fetus are just little people.

Little growing people. I'm not saying it's impossible with what we have now. Just that it's probably faaaar more complicated than you're making it out to be.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:41 am

The of Japan wrote:The fetus is inside a woman's body, not her body

aye

but her body is still HER body and she still has the right to control it.
whatever

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 177268
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Ifreann » Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:42 am

Harkback Union wrote:
Ifreann wrote:We might need to invent artificial wombs and develop a transplant procedure first.


I'm sure its a no-brainer. Just put the baby in a warm, cosy tank and link his blood network with that of his father through a glass tube. The father can carry the tank on his back. The only reason it wasn't done yet is lack of demand.

That definitely sounds like something that no one has ever demanded.


The of Japan wrote:The fetus is inside a woman's body, not her body

And given that it is inside her body, she can remove it from her body if she doesn't want it there.
He/Him
We are born of the salt, we are children of the sea
We don't bend our knee to no king or country
So we hoist the Jolly Roger, the colours of the free
And if we hit the gallows that's the way that it must be

Saoirse don Phalaistín

User avatar
Alvecia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20487
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:43 am

New Larthinia wrote:
Alvecia wrote:In law, wording is key.


Except this isn't a law, this is a statement regarding a possible law.

Speaking of, I think I managed to find the actual proposed law.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA:
SECTION
1. NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified
in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 1
-
732.1 of Title 63, unless there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:

A. No abortion shall be performed in this state without the
written informed consent of the father of the baby.

B. A pregnant woman seeking to abort her pregnancy shall be
required, at her expense, to provide in writing the identity of the
father of the baby to the physician who is to perform or induce the
abortion. If the person identified as the father of the baby
challenges the fact that he is the father, such individual, at his
expense, may demand that a paternity test be performed.

C. This section shall not apply if the father of the baby is
deceased and the woman upon whom the abortion is to be performed or
induced signs a notarized affidavit attesting to that fact.

D. This section shall not apply in cases in which a woman upon
whom the abortion is to be performed or induced was the victim of
rape or incest, and the pregnancy resulted from the rape or incest,
or in cases where the physician determines that the carrying of the
baby places the woman's life in danger.

SECTION
2. This act shall become effective November 1, 2017


Edit: Wonder what should happen if the identity of the father is not know?
Last edited by Alvecia on Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:45 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Gravlen
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18356
Founded: Jul 01, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Gravlen » Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:44 am

Dylar wrote:
Gravlen wrote:Ice cream is for cooling down, not for happiness. Anything other than cooling down is perverse, and an abomination. Also, you chose to have ice cream, you pay the consequences - no treatment for diabetus unless Wilford Brimley consents!

Come on...don't be a dick just because I have a completely different opinion than you. In fact I'm gonna apologize to you for sharing my opinion with you:
I'm sorry for offending you because I said what came to mind and didn't think before I acted.
There. Happy now?

Why do you think it's about you?
EnragedMaldivians wrote:That's preposterous. Gravlens's not a white nationalist; Gravlen's a penguin.

Unio de Sovetaj Socialismaj Respublikoj wrote:There is no use arguing the definition of murder with someone who has a picture of a penguin with a chainsaw as their nations flag.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:48 am

Alvecia wrote:
New Larthinia wrote:
Except this isn't a law, this is a statement regarding a possible law.

Speaking of, I think I managed to find the actual proposed law.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA:
SECTION
1. NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified
in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 1
-
732.1 of Title 63, unless there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:

A. No abortion shall be performed in this state without the
written informed consent of the father of the baby.

B. A pregnant woman seeking to abort her pregnancy shall be
required, at her expense, to provide in writing the identity of the
father of the baby to the physician who is to perform or induce the
abortion. If the person identified as the father of the baby
challenges the fact that he is the father, such individual, at his
expense, may demand that a paternity test be performed.

C. This section shall not apply if the father of the baby is
deceased and the woman upon whom the abortion is to be performed or
induced signs a notarized affidavit attesting to that fact.

D. This section shall not apply in cases in which a woman upon
whom the abortion is to be performed or induced was the victim of
rape or incest, and the pregnancy resulted from the rape or incest,
or in cases where the physician determines that the carrying of the
baby places the woman's life in danger.

SECTION
2. This act shall become effective November 1, 2017


Edit: Wonder what should happen if the identity of the father is not know?


oh so all you have to do is get your best friend joey to come with you and say he is the father and that he is OK with it. it doesn't matter that joey is gay and has never had sex with a woman let alone with YOU because there is no check involved to make sure of the identity of the father.

what could possibly go wrong?
whatever

User avatar
New Larthinia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 637
Founded: Oct 06, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby New Larthinia » Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:50 am

Ifreann wrote:
Harkback Union wrote:
I'm sure its a no-brainer. Just put the baby in a warm, cosy tank and link his blood network with that of his father through a glass tube. The father can carry the tank on his back. The only reason it wasn't done yet is lack of demand.

That definitely sounds like something that no one has ever demanded.


The of Japan wrote:The fetus is inside a woman's body, not her body

And given that it is inside her body, she can remove it from her body if she doesn't want it there.


It's not that simple. The fetus is not a random parasitic being, it's a human in the very early stages of development.
New Larthinia - spacial superpower, futuristic dictatorship, leaders of The Larthinian Phalanx. As our influence reaches for you across the Omniverse, you will have to make a choice everyone makes: join us or face us

We use factbooks, not NS stats
Proud member of The Anti Democracy League

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 177268
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Ifreann » Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:50 am

Alvecia wrote:
New Larthinia wrote:
Except this isn't a law, this is a statement regarding a possible law.

Speaking of, I think I managed to find the actual proposed law.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA:
SECTION
1. NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified
in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 1
-
732.1 of Title 63, unless there is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:

A. No abortion shall be performed in this state without the
written informed consent of the father of the baby.

B. A pregnant woman seeking to abort her pregnancy shall be
required, at her expense, to provide in writing the identity of the
father of the baby to the physician who is to perform or induce the
abortion. If the person identified as the father of the baby
challenges the fact that he is the father, such individual, at his
expense, may demand that a paternity test be performed.

C. This section shall not apply if the father of the baby is
deceased and the woman upon whom the abortion is to be performed or
induced signs a notarized affidavit attesting to that fact.

D. This section shall not apply in cases in which a woman upon
whom the abortion is to be performed or induced was the victim of
rape or incest, and the pregnancy resulted from the rape or incest,
or in cases where the physician determines that the carrying of the
baby places the woman's life in danger.

SECTION
2. This act shall become effective November 1, 2017


Edit: Wonder what should happen if the identity of the father is not know?

Since there doesn't seem to be any provision for confirming paternity unless the named father disputes it, a woman seeking an abortion could ask any guy friend to pretend to be the father.

Hey, and if the named father disputes paternity, he has to shell out for the paternity test. Maybe women who don't really want an abortion should go try and get one in Oklahoma and name Donald Trump as the father. For the lulz.
He/Him
We are born of the salt, we are children of the sea
We don't bend our knee to no king or country
So we hoist the Jolly Roger, the colours of the free
And if we hit the gallows that's the way that it must be

Saoirse don Phalaistín

User avatar
Harkback Union
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17499
Founded: Sep 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Harkback Union » Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:51 am

Ifreann wrote:
Harkback Union wrote:
I'm sure its a no-brainer. Just put the baby in a warm, cosy tank and link his blood network with that of his father through a glass tube. The father can carry the tank on his back. The only reason it wasn't done yet is lack of demand.

That definitely sounds like something that no one has ever demanded.


The of Japan wrote:The fetus is inside a woman's body, not her body

And given that it is inside her body, she can remove it from her body if she doesn't want it there.



The Fetus is a parasite man infect woman with for pleasure. It leeches off the host's Oxygen and nutrients for months before finally hatching, causing the host insufferable amounts of pain in the process. Once born, it continues its parasitic behavior for many years to come. Who wouldn't want them removed?

User avatar
Alvecia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20487
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:51 am

Ashmoria wrote:
Alvecia wrote:Speaking of, I think I managed to find the actual proposed law.


Edit: Wonder what should happen if the identity of the father is not know?


oh so all you have to do is get your best friend joey to come with you and say he is the father and that he is OK with it. it doesn't matter that joey is gay and has never had sex with a woman let alone with YOU because there is no check involved to make sure of the identity of the father.

what could possibly go wrong?

I smell a business opportunity.
"For only $5 I will write and sign a note declaring I am the father of your child and consent to an abortion"

User avatar
New Larthinia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 637
Founded: Oct 06, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby New Larthinia » Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:52 am

Dragonthigh wrote:EVERYBODY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What if a woman is kidnapped and raped and eventually escaped, but she needed the person who kidnapped her's permission to get an abortion after getting pregnant! That is sick and disgusting! Because it says the FATHER has to approve! Not husband, but FATHER A.K.A. the RAPIST!
She didn't choose to have sex and carry a baby, but if that law gets passed, she will have to give birth to the child of a kidnapper and rapist!


It is stated that the law doesn't apply to rape and incest
New Larthinia - spacial superpower, futuristic dictatorship, leaders of The Larthinian Phalanx. As our influence reaches for you across the Omniverse, you will have to make a choice everyone makes: join us or face us

We use factbooks, not NS stats
Proud member of The Anti Democracy League

User avatar
New Larthinia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 637
Founded: Oct 06, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby New Larthinia » Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:52 am

Harkback Union wrote:
Ifreann wrote:That definitely sounds like something that no one has ever demanded.



And given that it is inside her body, she can remove it from her body if she doesn't want it there.



The Fetus is a parasite man infect woman with for pleasure. It leeches off the host's Oxygen and nutrients for months before finally hatching, causing the host insufferable amounts of pain in the process. Once born, it continues its parasitic behavior for many years to come. Who wouldn't want them removed?


Except you failed to mention that the fetus is the same species as the mother
New Larthinia - spacial superpower, futuristic dictatorship, leaders of The Larthinian Phalanx. As our influence reaches for you across the Omniverse, you will have to make a choice everyone makes: join us or face us

We use factbooks, not NS stats
Proud member of The Anti Democracy League

User avatar
Sotral
Envoy
 
Posts: 201
Founded: Dec 13, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Sotral » Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:53 am

New Larthinia wrote:
It's not that simple. The fetus is not a random parasitic being, it's a human in the very early stages of development.

A human in later stages of development has no right to use anyone's body, and so fetuses don't either.

If we could jam adults into uteri as the only way to save their lives, the uterus bearer would still have the right to refuse to let anyone do it.
Fantasy Tech (effective tech level adjustable from Past Tech to Modern Tech powered by magic), Magocracy. Does not necessarily reflect my IRL opinions. Not interested in warfare roleplays.

My NS stats are a mess, you should probably ignore them.

Economic Left/Right: -4.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.92
Trans agender and bi. If you think there's something wrong with that and would like to have an honest discussion about it, TG me.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:53 am

Alvecia wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:
oh so all you have to do is get your best friend joey to come with you and say he is the father and that he is OK with it. it doesn't matter that joey is gay and has never had sex with a woman let alone with YOU because there is no check involved to make sure of the identity of the father.

what could possibly go wrong?

I smell a business opportunity.
"For only $5 I will write and sign a note declaring I am the father of your child and consent to an abortion"


so as you are the declared father of dozens of aborted embryo/fetuses are you "the man" "the hound dog" "the modern day don juan" or are you the pathetic creep who can only date sluts?

in any case its a whole new career path.
whatever

User avatar
Harkback Union
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17499
Founded: Sep 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Harkback Union » Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:55 am

New Larthinia wrote:
Harkback Union wrote:

The Fetus is a parasite man infect woman with for pleasure. It leeches off the host's Oxygen and nutrients for months before finally hatching, causing the host insufferable amounts of pain in the process. Once born, it continues its parasitic behavior for many years to come. Who wouldn't want them removed?


Except you failed to mention that the fetus is the same species as the mother


And so? It is still a parasite. Just because the parasite is feeding off from another parasite doesn't really make a difference.

User avatar
Alvecia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20487
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:56 am

Ashmoria wrote:
Alvecia wrote:I smell a business opportunity.
"For only $5 I will write and sign a note declaring I am the father of your child and consent to an abortion"


so as you are the declared father of dozens of aborted embryo/fetuses are you "the man" "the hound dog" "the modern day don juan" or are you the pathetic creep who can only date sluts?

in any case its a whole new career path.

Thinking about it, could the women themselves not just write notes declaring they are the father, and just sign it like Joseph instead of Josephine
Last edited by Alvecia on Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:56 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
New Larthinia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 637
Founded: Oct 06, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby New Larthinia » Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:57 am

Harkback Union wrote:
New Larthinia wrote:
Except you failed to mention that the fetus is the same species as the mother


And so? It is still a parasite. Just because the parasite is feeding off from another parasite doesn't really make a difference.


You're a parasite too
New Larthinia - spacial superpower, futuristic dictatorship, leaders of The Larthinian Phalanx. As our influence reaches for you across the Omniverse, you will have to make a choice everyone makes: join us or face us

We use factbooks, not NS stats
Proud member of The Anti Democracy League

User avatar
Alvecia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20487
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:58 am

New Larthinia wrote:
Harkback Union wrote:
And so? It is still a parasite. Just because the parasite is feeding off from another parasite doesn't really make a difference.


You're a parasite too

They live in another organism? How do they internet?

User avatar
New Larthinia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 637
Founded: Oct 06, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby New Larthinia » Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:58 am

Alvecia wrote:
New Larthinia wrote:
You're a parasite too

They live in another organism? How do they internet?


I mean, he did refer to the human species as parasites.
New Larthinia - spacial superpower, futuristic dictatorship, leaders of The Larthinian Phalanx. As our influence reaches for you across the Omniverse, you will have to make a choice everyone makes: join us or face us

We use factbooks, not NS stats
Proud member of The Anti Democracy League

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 177268
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Ifreann » Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:59 am

New Larthinia wrote:
Ifreann wrote:That definitely sounds like something that no one has ever demanded.



And given that it is inside her body, she can remove it from her body if she doesn't want it there.


It's not that simple. The fetus is not a random parasitic being, it's a human in the very early stages of development.

It is exactly that simple. No human at any other stage of development gets to inhabit another person's body without their permission. If the unborn have equal rights to everyone else, then the same is true for them. They can no more live inside a woman without her permission than you or I could, if that were physically possible.

Or are you proposing that foetuses should have special rights beyond those of any born human, superordinate to the rights of women?
He/Him
We are born of the salt, we are children of the sea
We don't bend our knee to no king or country
So we hoist the Jolly Roger, the colours of the free
And if we hit the gallows that's the way that it must be

Saoirse don Phalaistín

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 177268
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Ifreann » Wed Feb 15, 2017 8:00 am

Alvecia wrote:
New Larthinia wrote:
You're a parasite too

They live in another organism? How do they internet?

Wifi.
He/Him
We are born of the salt, we are children of the sea
We don't bend our knee to no king or country
So we hoist the Jolly Roger, the colours of the free
And if we hit the gallows that's the way that it must be

Saoirse don Phalaistín

User avatar
New Larthinia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 637
Founded: Oct 06, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby New Larthinia » Wed Feb 15, 2017 8:00 am

Ifreann wrote:
New Larthinia wrote:
It's not that simple. The fetus is not a random parasitic being, it's a human in the very early stages of development.

It is exactly that simple. No human at any other stage of development gets to inhabit another person's body without their permission. If the unborn have equal rights to everyone else, then the same is true for them. They can no more live inside a woman without her permission than you or I could, if that were physically possible.

Or are you proposing that foetuses should have special rights beyond those of any born human, superordinate to the rights of women?


But the fetus was procreated by a man too, and he should have a say in whether the fetus gets to live or not
New Larthinia - spacial superpower, futuristic dictatorship, leaders of The Larthinian Phalanx. As our influence reaches for you across the Omniverse, you will have to make a choice everyone makes: join us or face us

We use factbooks, not NS stats
Proud member of The Anti Democracy League

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: -Saiwania-, Atrito, Camtropia, Elejamie, Forsher, Hurdergaryp, Kurgao, Lankeshmati, Orlavia, Port Carverton, Slembana, Valrifell, Zinar-Fir-E-Fort 2, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads