Trump MAGAThread III: Steak, Vodka, Casinos, and America

[Soldati Senza Confini]

That would be more of a torture than a fight, okay, you win.

And no. I mean, I don't have children and I am 27, and I still don't feel ready to have kids, so no thanks.

I would argue that providing high school kids with a realistic experience of parenthood - not just the naming of a child and the cuddling, et cetera, but the experience of not being able to stop baby from crying, fractional sleep, extra costs, schedule management - is a great method of getting kids to at least think for a half second before they have sex.

Take out the "extra costs" part, or at least make it ficticious enough to where they have to manage a fixed amount of fake money, and I agree.

[The Rich Port]

Cite that bullshit.

Never heard of them claiming to be refugees.

http://www.latimes.com/world/europe/la- ... story.html

But there’s a catch: The French rampage did not appear to involve Syrian attackers, but rather Europeans who had gone to Syria and returned radicalized and battle-ready to wreak havoc in their homelands.

“We have changed the paradigm,” said Jean-Charles Brisard, a terrorism expert. “Our own citizens come back to Europe to perpetrate attacks. Europe needs to take that into account.”

Did you even read your own article?

Banning all refugees would NOT stop this.

[Cymrea]

So they'll just come in through a country not banned. One of the countries where dear leader does business.

Nope. Nothing is ever that simple. Not every country has a "revolving door" immigration policy like the EU, not to mention that not every country will let some random foreigner just pass through their country.

Yup. Exactly that simple. Have them come in from Saudi Arabia, or Egypt, or UAE.

Also the ban is both stupid and impractical.

[Gauthier]

http://www.latimes.com/world/europe/la- ... story.html

But there’s a catch: The French rampage did not appear to involve Syrian attackers, but rather Europeans who had gone to Syria and returned radicalized and battle-ready to wreak havoc in their homelands.

“We have changed the paradigm,” said Jean-Charles Brisard, a terrorism expert. “Our own citizens come back to Europe to perpetrate attacks. Europe needs to take that into account.”

Did you even read your own article?

Banning all refugees would NOT stop this.

Alternative Facts.

[Cattle Mutilators]

1. the worst people couldn't afford a boat fare

2. you couldn't naturalise unless you were Caucasian or African

Except in 1900, it was poor Greeks, Poles, Russians, and Italians who were viewed as the menace to America and its predominately Anglo-Saxon culture, just as the hated Irish had been a few decades earlier. And the view that dangerous elements (back then it was "anarchists" rather than "terrorists") were embedded in this immigrant tide was every bit as strong as it is today (if not even more so). See the infamous case of Sacco and Vanzetti, as well as the First Red Scare.

[The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp]

Hey what's going on here?

[Lady Scylla]

Hey what's going on here?

Someone told everyone to shut the hell up and move if they didn't like Trump, Abstinence isn't a very good policy on keeping horny teenagers from doing the THING, voting rights are a quirky thing, and clam chowder is what's for dinner.

[Cattle Mutilators]

Question, if you ban degrees or tax them, would you trust someone who tells you is a doctor without a relevant degree to prove he went to school to learn how to operate on people to perform an open heart surgery on you?

Who needs surgeons when we have faith healers?

Besides, if you're so sick that you need open heart surgery, you're already too much of a burden on society. Best to just die and leave society to carr on, right?

[Soldati Senza Confini]

Hey what's going on here?

Someone told everyone to shut the hell up and move if they didn't like Trump, Abstinence isn't a very good policy on keeping horny teenagers from doing the THING, voting rights are a quirky thing, and clam chowder is what's for dinner.

But I don't like clam chowder! D:

[Flarbinia]

If you don't like Trump, shut the Hell up and wait for the next election or move to fucking Canada.

There is no "memo that instructed the DHS to disobey a federal court order". The Emoluments Clause clearly states that "No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States, which shall have been created, or the Emoluments whereof shall have been increased during such time; and no Person holding any Office under the United States, shall be a Member of either House during his Continuance in Office. It does not say that the President can't fire someone for defying the law and there is nothing in the constitution that says that the President cannot deny refugees entrance to the United States. It is too easy for people to come to this country illegally, stay here, and cause a shit load of trouble when the opportunity strikes. Unlike Obama, who is willing to let every Tom, Dick, and Harry who claims to be a refugee enter our country, Trump is willing to ensure that what happened in Paris and Brussels does not occur on US soil, whether egotistical self-centered self-serving pinko-liberals like you agree with the solution or not. As for people saying that "domestic insurrection will be a problem", they have no clue what they are talking about. SJWs may talk shit on the internet, but they are weak cowards in real life, so they won't be doing anything violent. Black Lives Matter are all talk and no action when it comes to anything other than protests. Hollywood may talk shit about Trump, but at the end of the day, the celebrities who hate Trump ain't gonna do shit if it jeopardizes their opulent lifestyle.

I happen to be a citizen of the United States and I consider it my duty as a citizen to speak up when I disagree with the policies of the government. I will not "shut the Hell up." As an American statesman of the 19th century, himself an immigrant said, "My country, right or wrong: if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right."

I like you, Farnhamia. You are one of the few people I have met on the internet who is calm, reasonable, rational, and civilized when talking about Trump and your arguments are logical and well researched and you know when to stop and that is why I respect your opinion. However, most people on the Internet who do not agree with Trump are not calm, reasonable, rational, or civilized and their arguments tend to be pure opinionated dogma, this thread included. They lost my respect the moment I saw their posts. I respect the Right to Free Speech, but there is some point where people need to shut up and move on with their lives. I am leaving this thread before some SJW tries to spin this as racism, Islamophobia, or misogyny.

[Lady Scylla]

Question, if you ban degrees or tax them, would you trust someone who tells you is a doctor without a relevant degree to prove he went to school to learn how to operate on people to perform an open heart surgery on you?

Who needs surgeons when we have faith healers?

Besides, if you're so sick that you need open heart surgery, you're already too much of a burden on society. Best to just die and leave society to carr on, right?

We could go a step further. Burial plots take up land, and funerals are expensive. Ground them up, can them, and ship them off to the canteen at homeless shelters. We can solve world hunger!

[The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp]

Hey what's going on here?

Someone told everyone to shut the hell up and move if they didn't like Trump, Abstinence isn't a very good policy on keeping horny teenagers from doing the THING, voting rights are a quirky thing, and clam chowder is what's for dinner.

So, trying to shut up 90% of the posters on the thread?
Voting rights = good, have moar of them.
Never had clam.

[Lady Scylla]

I happen to be a citizen of the United States and I consider it my duty as a citizen to speak up when I disagree with the policies of the government. I will not "shut the Hell up." As an American statesman of the 19th century, himself an immigrant said, "My country, right or wrong: if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right."

I like you, Farnhamia. You are one of the few people I have met on the internet who is calm, reasonable, rational, and civilized when talking about Trump and your arguments are logical and well researched and you know when to stop and that is why I respect your opinion. However, most people on the Internet who do not agree with Trump are not calm, reasonable, rational, or civilized and their arguments tend to be pure opinionated dogma, this thread included. They lost my respect the moment I saw their posts. I respect the Right to Free Speech, but there is some point where people need to shut up and move on with their lives. I am leaving this thread before some SJW tries to spin this as racism, Islamophobia, or misogyny.

Bye, bye.

[Flarbinia]

Hey what's going on here?

Someone told everyone to shut the hell up and move if they didn't like Trump, Abstinence isn't a very good policy on keeping horny teenagers from doing the THING, voting rights are a quirky thing, and clam chowder is what's for dinner.

Not everyone, just the people who refuse to be rational, reasonable, logical, or civilized when discussing Donald Trump. Abstinence, voting rights, and clam chowder did not apply to my argument.

[Lady Scylla]

Someone told everyone to shut the hell up and move if they didn't like Trump, Abstinence isn't a very good policy on keeping horny teenagers from doing the THING, voting rights are a quirky thing, and clam chowder is what's for dinner.

So, trying to shut up 90% of the posters on the thread?
Voting rights = good, have moar of them.
Never had clam.

It's what I've been eating the last few days until the cheque comes in. ;~;

[Cymrea]

I like you, Farnhamia. You are one of the few people I have met on the internet who is calm, reasonable, rational, and civilized when talking about Trump and your arguments are logical and well researched and you know when to stop and that is why I respect your opinion. However, most people on the Internet who do not agree with Trump are not calm, reasonable, rational, or civilized and their arguments tend to be pure opinionated dogma, this thread included. They lost my respect the moment I saw their posts. I respect the Right to Free Speech, but there is some point where people need to shut up and move on with their lives. I am leaving this thread before some SJW tries to spin this as racism, Islamophobia, or misogyny.

Don't let critical assessment hit you in the ass on your way out.

[Lady Scylla]

Someone told everyone to shut the hell up and move if they didn't like Trump, Abstinence isn't a very good policy on keeping horny teenagers from doing the THING, voting rights are a quirky thing, and clam chowder is what's for dinner.

Not everyone, just the people who refuse to be rational, reasonable, logical, or civilized when discussing Donald Trump. Abstinence, voting rights, and clam chowder did not apply to my argument.

They were never addressed to you to begin with, so of course they didn't.

[Soldati Senza Confini]

Someone told everyone to shut the hell up and move if they didn't like Trump, Abstinence isn't a very good policy on keeping horny teenagers from doing the THING, voting rights are a quirky thing, and clam chowder is what's for dinner.

Not everyone, just the people who refuse to be rational, reasonable, logical, or civilized. Abstinence, voting rights, and clam chowder did not apply to my argument.

Christ, you're the one coming in and not knowing what the whole Federal crisis is about, for one.

We are all aware of what is going on, and the ban is not a problem just because it is a ban, it is the retroactive effects of it that are a problem.

[Cohevinsky]

[b]ok heres a proposition: cats for everyone[/b]

[Tekeristan]

"On Tuesday, Donald Trump met with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., an environmental lawyer and activist, who also happens to be an outspoken vaccine conspiracy theorist. After the meeting, Kennedy told reporters it went “very well,” and said that Trump “asked me to chair a commission on vaccine safety and scientific integrity.”
Was this discussed?
January 10th, but still.

[Cattle Mutilators]

It depends what he did instead. In the past, doctors would apprentice at hospitals. If he had an apprenticeship from a reputable hospital, sure.

19th Century health care is the best health care!

[The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp]

Someone told everyone to shut the hell up and move if they didn't like Trump, Abstinence isn't a very good policy on keeping horny teenagers from doing the THING, voting rights are a quirky thing, and clam chowder is what's for dinner.

Not everyone, just the people who refuse to be rational, reasonable, logical, or civilized when discussing Donald Trump. Abstinence, voting rights, and clam chowder did not apply to my argument.

clam chowder applies to everything.

[Vassenor]

So today on non-existent hate crimes...

[Nimzonia]

You might as well save yourself a trip to the polling station if you're going to do anything but vote for either of the two candidates that stand a chance of winning. Stay at home and cast an automatic ballot for low voter turnout.

It's my civic duty to vote, so I'm gonna do it. Maybe stop taking your rights for granted.

Not voting is also a right, and is effectively what you are doing anyway. Bullshit write-ins help nobody and serve no purpose. If you want to do your civic duty, stay at home and make the queue shorter for real voters who are actually participating in the democratic process instead of just deluding themselves.

[Patridam]

ABC cuts out footage of JFK detainee saying he likes Donald Trump.