This is America. The judge might need to run for re-election.
Advertisement

by Ifreann » Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:06 pm

by Novus America » Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:06 pm
Genivaria wrote:According to the laws of the state the death penalty is warranted.
That said I personally would rather we have an actual rehabilitation program and get rid of the death penalty altogether.

by Mer Salcia » Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:06 pm

by Ethel mermania » Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:06 pm

by Ifreann » Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:07 pm

by The Althing Confederacy » Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:07 pm
The idea that racial politics in the US aren't politics is simply idiotic. The guy wanted to start a race war.

by The Princes of the Universe » Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:07 pm

by Fartsniffage » Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:08 pm

by Salandriagado » Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:22 pm
Major-Tom wrote:The Realm of Lordaeron wrote:
It's not. It's actually more expensive, more risky and you run the potential of accidentally killing the wrong person. Plus, killing doesn't bring back the dead, it just satiates our perverted human desire for social vengeance.
Ehhh...I always hear people say a lethal shot is more expensive than life in prison. How does that work?
True, thats why you rarely use it. And sometimes vengeance is good.
Thermodolia wrote:The Realm of Lordaeron wrote:
It's not. It's actually more expensive, more risky and you run the potential of accidentally killing the wrong person. Plus, killing doesn't bring back the dead, it just satiates our perverted human desire for social vengeance.
I don't care about the risk, they should have thought of that when they committed the crime. The expense comes from them sitting on death row for decades on end. If we execute them immediately afterwards it wouldn't be very expensive, especially if we don't go though all the hoops to minimize their pain.
Thermodolia wrote:The Realm of Lordaeron wrote:
Ever heard of the innocence project?
the death penalty leaves no room for mistakes -- if you fucking execute the wrong person and found out later, there are no do overs or compensation that can be given. The potential of executing an innocent man should be reason enough to abolish the death penalty.
Sometimes bad things happen to good people.
Though I'd like a statistics on how offensive it is we are executing innocent people, because I don't think it's that high. If one innocent has to die for every 100 assholes than it's worth the cost to me
Novus America wrote:Ifreann wrote:Life sentences are a thing.
So are prisoners escaping and killing people in prison. I do think there should be a higher standard for the death penalty. Beyond a shadow of a doubt rather than beyond a reasonable doubt. While rare, this case is such a case. A mistake here is not possible.
Then the test should be wil he be a threat to other inmates or guards? Is he an escape risk?
If he is then hang him (not advocating death, just stating what I think the test for the death penalty should be, I am not sure how a judge would rule on the last part in this case).
Novus America wrote:Neutraligon wrote:What game? The consequence of shortening the process to 5 years is that the innocent will die, and that one of your relatives, or even you might be that innocent.
Well the solution is the legal standard for the orginal conviction. Beyond a reasonable doubt still leaves a possibility of mistake. For death penalty it should be beyond a shadow of a doubt. Which is really hard to prove.
This case meets the standard. If there is any possible doubt the death penalty should not be available.
Thermodolia wrote:The Realm of Lordaeron wrote:
The thing about Government policy is that it has to be applied broadly and equally.
Killing this cocksucker won't end terrorism or racism. He's a scumbag, but the cost of the death penalty transcends this one crime.
I never claimed that it would. Damn the cost

by The Realm of Lordaeron » Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:26 pm
Salandriagado wrote:Major-Tom wrote:
Ehhh...I always hear people say a lethal shot is more expensive than life in prison. How does that work?
True, thats why you rarely use it. And sometimes vengeance is good.
Appeals. Appeals are expensive, and the appeals process for the death penalty is (necessarily) very stringent.Thermodolia wrote:I don't care about the risk, they should have thought of that when they committed the crime. The expense comes from them sitting on death row for decades on end. If we execute them immediately afterwards it wouldn't be very expensive, especially if we don't go though all the hoops to minimize their pain.
The risk is that the person never committed the crime in the first place.Thermodolia wrote:Sometimes bad things happen to good people.
That doesn't mean that we should make them happen more often to more good people. "The world isn't perfect" is not a reason to make it worse.Though I'd like a statistics on how offensive it is we are executing innocent people, because I don't think it's that high. If one innocent has to die for every 100 assholes than it's worth the cost to me
What is the actual benefit gained by executing quite so many innocent people?Novus America wrote:
So are prisoners escaping and killing people in prison. I do think there should be a higher standard for the death penalty. Beyond a shadow of a doubt rather than beyond a reasonable doubt. While rare, this case is such a case. A mistake here is not possible.
Then the test should be wil he be a threat to other inmates or guards? Is he an escape risk?
If he is then hang him (not advocating death, just stating what I think the test for the death penalty should be, I am not sure how a judge would rule on the last part in this case).
In a supermax facility, nobody is a threat to anybody, or a realistic escape risk. Fucking hard to be a threat to people when you're locked alone in a tiny room all day.Novus America wrote:
Well the solution is the legal standard for the orginal conviction. Beyond a reasonable doubt still leaves a possibility of mistake. For death penalty it should be beyond a shadow of a doubt. Which is really hard to prove.
This case meets the standard. If there is any possible doubt the death penalty should not be available.
"Beyond a shadow of doubt" still leaves a non-zero probability of making a mistake. Because literally every decision making process that involves, at any point in it, a human or something made by humans has such a failure probability.Thermodolia wrote:I never claimed that it would. Damn the cost
What, exactly, is the material benefit that you expect to gain from this cost?Thermodolia wrote:Dropped from a helicopter is another choice
People have, by freak accident, survived some utterly ridiculous drops. Killing people in the name of justice is moronic, but if you really must do it, at least do it by a method that doesn't carry the risk of accidentally letting them escape.

by Fartsniffage » Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:34 pm

by Great Minarchistan » Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:37 pm

by Salandriagado » Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:43 pm
Great Minarchistan wrote:A sadistic alternative would be to sentence him by 15 years for every accusation (33 in this case), so he would need to take 33 paroles to get out of prison. Behave like a saint to get freed would take... 30 years?
I am not a perpetual prison fan though. It is better for us and for him to take the death penalty. After all, get locked in a prison for 30+ years doesn't seem any better (nor it is for prison's budget).

by Great Minarchistan » Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:56 pm
Salandriagado wrote:Great Minarchistan wrote:A sadistic alternative would be to sentence him by 15 years for every accusation (33 in this case), so he would need to take 33 paroles to get out of prison. Behave like a saint to get freed would take... 30 years?
I am not a perpetual prison fan though. It is better for us and for him to take the death penalty. After all, get locked in a prison for 30+ years doesn't seem any better (nor it is for prison's budget).
You realise that this is more expensive than life imprisonment, right?

by Farnhamia » Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:58 pm

by Kaboomlandia » Tue Jan 10, 2017 9:07 pm
The Serbian Empire wrote:The only thing bad about him being sentenced to death is that he'll be in solitary confinement and able to cost millions in appeals. Life would be cheaper.

by Oldenfranck » Tue Jan 10, 2017 9:07 pm

by Kaboomlandia » Tue Jan 10, 2017 9:09 pm
Oldenfranck wrote:It is a step in the right direction of ridding the world of this evil man ASAP, but in reality when the judge sentences him tommorow, he is going to be rotting on death row for the next twenty years now...

by Oldenfranck » Tue Jan 10, 2017 9:10 pm
Kaboomlandia wrote:Oldenfranck wrote:It is a step in the right direction of ridding the world of this evil man ASAP, but in reality when the judge sentences him tommorow, he is going to be rotting on death row for the next twenty years now...
Speaking of which...how long have we been stuck with Tsarnaev's appeals for?

by Kaboomlandia » Tue Jan 10, 2017 9:16 pm

by Mount-Kilimanjaro » Tue Jan 10, 2017 9:23 pm
Kaboomlandia wrote:I think we all saw this coming when Roof wanted to represent himself. Not sure what he thought was going to happen.

by Dayton » Tue Jan 10, 2017 9:31 pm
Kaboomlandia wrote:I think we all saw this coming when Roof wanted to represent himself. Not sure what he thought was going to happen.

by Brkelgarozed » Tue Jan 10, 2017 9:38 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ariddia, Dannemarksnagore, Democratic Kingdom of South India, Elejamie, Fartsniffage, Knights of LUSITANIA, Las Costas, Liberty Martyred, Namante, Outer Armatonisdaristan, Puchialand, Trumpanomics, UN Galactic Authority, Ween Weed Nation
Advertisement